What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Okta due to Microsoft's competitive threat, with ASML and Enbridge also facing significant geopolitical and regulatory risks respectively. The long-term 'set-and-forget' thesis is challenged by these companies' high-beta nature and structural risks.
Risk: Okta's platform displacement by Microsoft's EntraID and Enbridge's debt-fueled growth in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment.
Opportunity: ASML's durable backlog and Enbridge's regulated, fee-based cash flows.
Key Points
Okta reported impressive 2025 earnings per share that grew more than 200%.
ASML is the only company that makes extreme ultraviolet lithography machines.
Midstream energy operator Enbridge boasts 31 consecutive years of dividend increases.
- 10 stocks we like better than Okta ›
Investing with a 20-year horizon requires looking past quarterly volatility and focusing on structural shifts in the global economy.
Okta (NASDAQ: OKTA), ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML), and Enbridge (NYSE: ENB) are all set to benefit from long-term trends in technology and industry. Okta's shares are down more than 12% this year, while Enbridge and ASML are up more than 11% and 36%, respectively.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Yet, all three companies enjoy competitive moats that will drive revenue growth for decades. Here's why I like each stock for the next 20 years.
Okta is the guard dog of cybersecurity
In the past, cybersecurity focused on protecting a physical office or a closed private network, but as permanent hybrid work and cloud-based operations become the norm, the network perimeter has evaporated.
In this new environment, identity is the constant. Whether an employee is logging in from a coffee shop or an automated bot is accessing a server, verifying who is requesting access is the most critical security layer. Okta's position as a cloud-native, independent provider of workforce identity (employees) and customer identity (users) makes it a utility platform for the modern internet.
Unlike tech competitors such as Microsoft and its EntraID, a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) service, Okta does not care which ecosystem a company uses. If a company uses Amazon Web Services (AWS) from Amazon for cloud, Gmail from Alphabet for email, and Slack from Salesforce for communication, Okta integrates seamlessly across all of them.
As companies increasingly adopt best-of-class software stacks rather than sticking to a single vendor, Okta serves as a connector that ties disparate systems together. Over 20 years, as new tech giants emerge and old ones fade, Okta's ability to remain the universal translator for login credentials provides it with a durable moat.
It has an outstanding growth profile
In 2025, Okta showed strong results, reporting yearly revenue of $2.92 billion, an increase of 12%, with subscription revenue climbing 12% to $2.86 billion. Earnings per share (EPS) were $1.31, up 208%. In 2026, the company anticipates revenue of $3.17 billion to $3.19 billion, up 9% at the midpoint, and non-GAAP EPS of $3.74 to $3.82, up 8% at the midpoint.
By consolidating its various services into a single platform, the San Francisco company increases its stickiness. Once a company has integrated its entire employee lifecycle and customer login portal into Okta, the switching costs become incredibly high, creating a reliable stream of recurring revenue that can compound over decades.
ASML has a huge moat
ASML, based in the Netherlands, is the only company in the world that manufactures EUV (extreme ultraviolet) lithography machines. These machines, used to print the microscopic patterns onto silicon wafers that become the world's most advanced semiconductor chips, are roughly the size of a bus, cost more than $200 million (or upwards of $350 million for the new "High-NA" models), and have been called the most sophisticated machines ever built.
The barrier to entry for a competitor is huge. It took ASML nearly three decades of research and development and billions in investment to perfect EUV. For a rival to catch up now would require decades of trial and error and a supply chain of thousands of specialized partners that simply doesn't exist elsewhere.
High-yield exposure to every megatrend
While specific tech companies (such as those in AI, cloud computing, or EV manufacturing) may rise and fall over 20 years, they all share one common requirement: more powerful, more efficient chips. ASML acts as a toll booth for the entire semiconductor industry.
Whether the next two decades are dominated by artificial general intelligence, the Internet of Things (IOT), autonomous transportation, or quantum computing, none of it can happen without the lithography steps that ASML controls. By holding ASML, you aren't trying to guess which software or hardware company wins.
Impressive margins, steady growth
In the first quarter of fiscal 2026, ASML reported revenue of €8.8 billion ($10.3 billion), up 13.3%, and EPS of €7.15 ($8.4 billion), up 19.2%. It also provided 2026 guidance for annual revenue between €36 billion ($42.2 billion) and €40 billion ($46.9 billion), up 30% at the midpoint, and for annual gross margin between 51% and 53%.
The most promising metric for long-term investors is its reported €46.5 billion ($54.5 billion) in customer commitments for systems and services over the next five years. Roughly 83% of the 2026 revenue target is already covered by existing orders, providing significant protection against a sudden economic downturn.
Enbridge can easily adapt to a lower-carbon future
Midstream operator Enbridge is seen as an oil and gas pipeline company, but its current strategy focuses on becoming a diversified energy delivery utility that can survive the transition to a lower-carbon economy.
The company is seeing significant growth in demand for its natural gas services as data centers require a steady stream of power and Enbridge, after purchasing three gas utilities from Dominion Energy in 2023 for $14 billion, is now the largest natural gas utility provider in North America. The company is also ramping up its renewable power offerings, with solar and wind power projects in Europe and the U.S.
The company's miles of pipelines are a type of moat
The Canadian energy company, through its 18,085 miles of pipelines, transports approximately 30% of all crude oil produced in North America and nearly 20% of the natural gas consumed in the U.S. These are mission-critical assets that are nearly impossible to replicate today due to regulatory and environmental hurdles, giving existing pipelines immense scarcity value over the next two decades.
Those pipelines are essentially toll booths that pay off regardless of oil or natural gas prices. In 2025, the company reported EPS of CAD $3.23 ($2.36), up 38%, and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, deprecation, and amortization (EBITDA) of CAD $19.9 billion ($14.6 billion), up 7%.
Different reasons to stay the course
Okta and ASML are both expected to ride the growth of artificial intelligence and data center needs over the next 20 years, making them revenue growth machines. Enbridge's yearly revenue has only grown 78% over the past 10 years, lower that Okta's or ASML's, but it makes up for that with a dividend that it has increased for 31 consecutive years, including a 3% bump this year, delivering a yield at its current share price of around 5.15%, another great reason to hold onto the stock for 20 years.
Should you buy stock in Okta right now?
Before you buy stock in Okta, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Okta wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $492,752! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,327,935!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 991% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 201% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 28, 2026. *
James Halley has positions in ASML, Alphabet, Enbridge, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Alphabet, Amazon, Enbridge, Microsoft, Okta, and Salesforce. The Motley Fool recommends Dominion Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article conflates market dominance with long-term investment safety, ignoring the existential threats posed by platform bundling, geopolitical trade barriers, and capital-intensive debt cycles."
This article leans on a 'set-and-forget' 20-year thesis that ignores significant structural risks. ASML is undeniably the backbone of the semiconductor industry, but it faces extreme geopolitical risk regarding China export restrictions and the massive capital expenditure volatility inherent in the chip cycle. Okta’s 'neutral' platform positioning is increasingly threatened by Microsoft’s aggressive bundling of EntraID, which creates a 'good enough' security alternative that erodes Okta’s pricing power. Meanwhile, Enbridge’s dividend growth is impressive, but its reliance on debt-fueled acquisitions to offset stagnant organic growth is a red flag in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment. These aren't just 'monster' stocks; they are high-beta assets requiring active management, not passive holding.
If these companies truly possess the 'indispensable' moats described, their ability to pass costs to customers could allow them to outpace inflation and regulatory headwinds over a two-decade horizon regardless of short-term cycles.
"Okta faces decelerating growth and intensifying competition from bundled Microsoft Entra ID, making its 45x forward P/E unsustainable for a 20-year hold."
Okta's identity moat is real but eroding against Microsoft's Entra ID, which is bundled 'free' with Microsoft 365 for 80% of enterprises, pressuring pricing power—revenue growth slowed to 12% in FY25 from 20%+ prior years, with FY26 guide at just 9%. Forward P/E ~45x on decelerating EPS growth (non-GAAP +~185% YoY but normalizing) screams valuation risk if multi-cloud fragmentation fails to offset. ASML's EUV monopoly endures geopolitical headwinds (China bans), but semi cycles could halve bookings; ENB's 5% yield and 31-year dividend streak shine, yet low-carbon shift caps upside (revenue +78% past decade). Long-term holds? ASML yes, others stretch.
If AI-driven data centers explode identity management demand across hybrid clouds, Okta's vendor-agnostic platform could capture outsized share despite competition.
"The article presents a 20-year thesis without disclosing current valuations, making it impossible to assess whether these are generational buys or overpriced momentum plays."
This article conflates three fundamentally different investment theses under a 20-year umbrella, obscuring real risks. ASML's moat is genuine but faces geopolitical headwinds (China restrictions, export controls) that could crater demand. Okta's 208% EPS growth is misleading—likely driven by operating leverage and one-time items, not sustainable 8% guidance. Enbridge's 31-year dividend streak masks energy transition risk: natural gas demand faces structural headwinds, and 5.15% yield suggests the market prices in limited upside. The article ignores valuation entirely—no P/E multiples, no comparison to historical ranges. A 20-year hold requires knowing if you're buying at fair value or peak euphoria.
If ASML maintains pricing power and geopolitical risk doesn't materialize, and if Okta's platform stickiness justifies 15x+ forward multiples, and if Enbridge's utility-like cash flows support the dividend indefinitely, this could be a genuinely boring, compounding portfolio.
"The long-duration bull case hinges on continued capex and favorable regulation; a sudden downturn or policy shock could derail even these entrenched moats."
Opening take: The piece frames OKTA, ASML, ENB as enduring 20-year winners on AI, semiconductors, and energy infrastructure. But the long horizon hides fragilities: Okta's moat may be overstated as Microsoft EntraID pressure grows and enterprise budgets shift; ASML's EUV monopoly could be strained by export-controls to China and a cyclical drop in chip capex that hits backlog retention; Enbridge's dividend looks solid but is vulnerable to higher rates, energy-transition policy, and pipeline/regulatory risk that could curb growth. Still, a durable backlog (ASML) and a toll-booth asset base (Enbridge) offer resilience if capex stays robust. Investors must monitor orders, policy, and financing costs.
Okta's moat may be thinner than implied, as Microsoft EntraID could erode share if enterprise budgets consolidate. ASML's EUV monopoly could face export-control shocks amid geopolitical risk, and Enbridge's dividend is vulnerable to energy policy shifts and higher financing costs.
"Enbridge's regulatory barriers to entry provide a more durable defensive moat than the tech-centric competition faced by Okta."
Claude, you correctly identified the valuation gap, but we’re ignoring the 'toll-booth' leverage Enbridge actually holds. While you flag energy transition risk, you’re missing that Enbridge is pivoting to natural gas exports and renewables, effectively hedging against stranded asset risk. Unlike Okta, which faces existential platform displacement by Microsoft, Enbridge’s infrastructure is physically irreplaceable. The real risk isn't the energy transition; it's the regulatory hurdle for new pipeline capacity, which actually protects their existing, legacy moat.
"Enbridge's renewables contribute just 1% of EBITDA, amplifying debt-fueled risks in a higher-rate world despite infrastructure moat."
Gemini, Enbridge's renewables pivot is negligible—$109M EBITDA in 2023 vs $10.3B total (1%)—while debt/EBITDA at 5.1x heightens vulnerability to sustained 5%+ rates, crimping FCF for that 31-year dividend streak. Regulatory protection doesn't fix stagnant organic growth (2-3% CAGR), making it less 'toll-booth' resilient than you claim amid nat gas demand uncertainty.
"ENB's regulatory moat is real but fragile if LNG demand contracts while debt remains elevated."
Grok's debt math on ENB is solid, but Gemini's regulatory moat deserves more weight. Pipeline capacity is genuinely constrained by permitting, not competition—that's different from Okta's tech displacement risk. However, neither addresses the real vulnerability: if LNG export demand softens (geopolitical, recession), ENB's leverage becomes dangerous fast. The dividend isn't at risk from rates alone; it's at risk from volume cliff. That's the second-order effect being missed.
"ENB’s dividend safety hinges on LNG export volume and regulatory approvals; with higher rates, a capex cycle, and potential LNG demand softness, the debt load becomes the binding risk more than the current valuation suggests."
Grok is right on the debt appraisal, but ENB’s core asset is regulated, fee-based cash flows that historically buoy FCF even in cycles. The bigger, underappreciated risk is LNG-export volume and permitting, which could squeeze growth and accelerate refinancing needs if rates stay high. So the threat isn’t simply higher rates; it's a shift in volume and policy that could pressure the 31-year dividend longer than multiple expansion.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel consensus is bearish on Okta due to Microsoft's competitive threat, with ASML and Enbridge also facing significant geopolitical and regulatory risks respectively. The long-term 'set-and-forget' thesis is challenged by these companies' high-beta nature and structural risks.
ASML's durable backlog and Enbridge's regulated, fee-based cash flows.
Okta's platform displacement by Microsoft's EntraID and Enbridge's debt-fueled growth in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment.