By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on the stocks Realty Income (O), Comcast (CMCSA), and Verizon (VZ) discussed in the article, citing risks such as interest rate sensitivity, lack of genuine pricing power, and potential capital appreciation decline.
Risk: Duration risk and potential financing issues for Realty Income's data-center push in a high-rate world.
Opportunity: None explicitly stated.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Most of us would do well to invest in healthy and growing dividend-paying stocks to some degree. They're likely not only to appreciate in value over time but also to pay out cash along the way, often increasing their payouts. What's not to like? Here are three dividend-paying stocks to consider now.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Meet Realty Income (NYSE: O). You may not have heard of it, but it's a real estate investment trust (REIT) -- a company that owns lots of real estate, leasing it to tenants -- with a recent dividend yield of 5.1%. The company's dividend is rather dependable, as it's been paid for 673 consecutive months and has increased for more than 30 years in a row.
Realty Income uses "triple-net leases" in its business, requiring tenants to cover real estate taxes, property insurance, and operating expenses. The company recently boasted a portfolio of over 15,500 properties in all 50 U.S. states and parts of Europe. It's well diversified, with about 1,800 clients in more than 90 different industries. It's diversifying into data centers, too.
This stock offers an easy way to invest in real estate.
Comcast (NASDAQ: CMCSA) is a multifaceted business, offering internet, TV, and phone services (with brands such as Xfinity), as well as media and streaming platforms (such as NBC, Telemundo, and Peacock) -- and theme parks and film studios (such as Universal Studios and DreamWorks Animation).
Comcast recently sported a sizable dividend yield of 5.6%, and if you factor in the effect of share buybacks, which reduce the total share count and leave each remaining share more valuable, the total yield for shareholders is around 13%.
The stock is reasonably priced, too, with a recent forward-looking price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 7, below the five-year average of 9.7, with a recent price-to-sales ratio of just 0.7. Those low numbers reflect rather low expectations from investors. Why?
Well, the company has struggled recently, averaging annual losses of 12% over the past five years (as of July 7). It has a lot of debt, its TV business is fighting against streaming services, and it has a poor customer service reputation, among other issues.
There's reason to hope, though. Comcast plans to spin off NBCUniversal to focus mainly on its cable TV and broadband businesses, which deliver robust cash flow. Those believing in Comcast's turnaround prospects can be paid well to wait.
Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) sports a fat dividend yield of 6.6%. Better still, it has been increasing its dividend for 20 years in a row (though generally modestly).
Verizon isn't likely to be a fast grower. But it's another cash cow, generating revenue from close to 150 million wireless customers and more than 16 million broadband connections. It's expanding internationally, too, planning to spin off its international enterprise-focused business into a joint venture with London-based BT Group.
Another plus is its low volatility, which may be welcome should the market pullback in the near future. And its stock is appealingly valued, with a recent forward P/E of 8.6, a bit below its five-year average of 8.7.
Take a closer look at any of these stocks that interest you, as each could provide significant returns via dividends.
Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $407,004! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,244,599!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 924% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 210% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of July 10, 2026. *
Selena Maranjian has positions in Realty Income and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income. The Motley Fool recommends Comcast and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"These dividend yields are not 'safe' income but rather compensation for structural secular decline and interest-rate-sensitive balance sheet risks that the article fails to quantify."
While the article highlights dividend safety, it ignores the interest rate sensitivity inherent in these picks. Realty Income (O) faces a 'higher for longer' cost of capital environment that pressures FFO (Funds From Operations) growth, as its expansion into data centers requires massive, expensive leverage. Comcast (CMCSA) and Verizon (VZ) are essentially 'yield traps' masquerading as value plays. Their low forward P/E ratios are not discounts; they are market signals of terminal decline in their core legacy segments—cable and wireline—which are being cannibalized by fiber and 5G fixed-wireless competition. Investors chasing these 5-6% yields are likely trading capital appreciation for a declining asset base that lacks genuine pricing power.
If the Federal Reserve initiates a aggressive rate-cutting cycle, the valuation compression on REITs like Realty Income would reverse sharply, and the high debt loads of telecom giants would suddenly become a leverage-driven tailwind for earnings.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"High yields on these stocks reflect investor pessimism about growth and rising rates, not safety—buyers are paying for current income while accepting capital risk if macro conditions don't improve."
This article conflates yield with total return—a dangerous move in a rising-rate environment. All three stocks trade at depressed valuations (O at 5.1%, CMCSA at 7x forward P/E, VZ at 8.6x), but that reflects real headwinds: REIT cap rates may compress further if rates fall, but rise sharply if they don't; CMCSA's spinoff is binary and unpriced; VZ's 20-year dividend growth masks stagnant revenue and margin compression. The article ignores duration risk: a 5%+ yielder is a bond proxy, and if rates stay elevated, capital appreciation won't offset yield. Buybacks at CMCSA are funded by debt, not organic cash flow.
If the Fed cuts rates materially in 2025, these depressed valuations could re-rate upward while yields remain attractive—total returns could exceed the article's modest framing. CMCSA's spinoff could unlock $20–30B in value if executed well.
"High advertised yields may attract, but macro-rate risk and spin-off/JV execution risk threaten total returns as much as dividends do."
The article touts O, CMCSA, and VZ with yields above 5% as safe-income plays, but it glosses over key risks. Realty Income is rate-sensitive as a REIT, and triple-net leases won't shield it from rental slowdowns in a recession. Comcast’s NBCUniversal spin-off could unlock value, but execution risk and near-term cash-flow visibility remain uncertain. Verizon's 6.6% yield relies on continued 5G monetization and the international JV, both uncertain; plus, high yields invite multiple compression if rates stay elevated. Overall, the income angle looks attractive only if macro conditions stay favorable and the operational catalysts hit; otherwise, total returns could disappoint.
The '13% total yield' claim for Comcast is misleading; buybacks don't create cash yield, and the real outcomes depend on operating cash flow and the success/ timing of the spin-off and JV, which could disappoint.
"Realty Income's triple-net lease model provides a structural inflation hedge that mitigates interest rate sensitivity more effectively than Gemini suggests."
Gemini, your dismissal of Realty Income as a 'yield trap' ignores its unique triple-net lease structure, which shifts property-level inflation risk to tenants. While you correctly flag cost-of-capital pressures, you overlook that O's scale allows it to access capital markets more efficiently than smaller REITs. The real risk isn't just interest rates; it's the potential for tenant defaults in the retail sector if consumer spending hits a wall, not the REIT's internal leverage profile.
[Unavailable]
"O's triple-net leases don't offset the duration risk of holding a 5%+ yielder in a 'higher for longer' rate environment."
Gemini's tenant-inflation hedge is real, but Claude nails the duration trap: a 5%+ yielder IS a bond proxy, and if rates stay elevated through 2025, O's cap-rate compression never materializes. The triple-net structure doesn't solve that. More pressing: O's data-center pivot requires massive capex at higher borrowing costs—Gemini flagged this but didn't quantify it. If FFO growth stalls while the yield stays sticky, you're locked into a declining real return. That's the actual trap.
"Financing costs for Realty Income’s data-center expansion in a persistently high-rate environment threaten FFO growth and could turn a 5%+ yield into a compromised income base."
Claude, duration risk matters, but the real overlooked risk is financing for O’s data-center push in a high-rate world. If debt costs stay elevated, capex-heavy growth could undercut FFO growth, making the 5%+ yield a compromised base rather than a true income anchor. In a downturn, retail tenant defaults and CMCSA/VZ capex needs could compress payout credibility more than the article implies.
The panel consensus is bearish on the stocks Realty Income (O), Comcast (CMCSA), and Verizon (VZ) discussed in the article, citing risks such as interest rate sensitivity, lack of genuine pricing power, and potential capital appreciation decline.
None explicitly stated.
Duration risk and potential financing issues for Realty Income's data-center push in a high-rate world.