By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
Panelists agree that while fintech growth is real, both Sezzle and SoFi face significant headwinds, including macroeconomic pressures and competitive challenges. The consensus is that current valuations may not be sustainable.
Risk: Increased unemployment leading to higher credit provisions and delinquencies, particularly for SoFi's personal loan book and Sezzle's BNPL model.
Opportunity: Diversification into different fintech segments, as suggested by Grok, to mitigate risks.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Investing in fintech has helped some shareholders outperform the S&P 500, and that trend can continue.
Sezzle delivered solid Q1 results that showcased active member growth, higher sales, and rising margins.
SoFi's prolonged correction makes little sense given its record-breaking earnings, which have strengthened the long-term thesis.
Fintech stocks combine fast-growing tech platforms with financial products and have produced compelling opportunities that have outperformed the S&P 500.
Mordor Intelligence projects a 15.3% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) through 2030 for the entire fintech industry, but with some companies gaining market share faster than others, it's worth digging for some winning stocks. These two fintech stocks look suited for long-term investors at current levels.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Sezzle (NASDAQ: SEZL) offers a Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) platform for people who want to break everyday purchases into installment plans. Customers can turn a $100 purchase into four monthly $25 payments, which increases their purchasing power. That type of leverage helps Sezzle set a payment processing fee of 6.1% of every purchase, plus $0.30 per transaction for merchants.
High merchant fees reduce how much people pay when making purchases with Sezzle. While late fees apply, anyone who makes all four payments on time will not accrue any interest. Small service fees apply to some orders, but a monthly subscription plan nixes them as well.
Sezzle saw a 48.4% year-over-year improvement in its subscriber base in the first quarter, which is part of a prolonged uptrend. A growing subscriber base acted as the foundation for Sezzle's 29.2% year-over-year revenue growth. Net income grew faster, resulting in a 37.9% net profit margin.
The fintech company is gaining market share in a red-hot industry while attracting more subscribers and boosting engagement from its core audience. That winning formula has translated into rising sales and sustainable scale.
SoFi (NASDAQ: SOFI) didn't have the same reception after announcing its Q1 results as Sezzle did. While Sezzle surged by more than 10% on strong earnings, SoFi dipped by more than 15%. Long-term SoFi investors have watched their stakes drop by more than 40% year to date.
Although the recent stock performance doesn't look like it, SoFi actually delivered solid results. Revenue, members, and product growth all hit new records. SoFi now has 14.7 million members, and its crypto business went from nonexistent in 2025 to producing $239.5 million in Q1. It only represents a little more than 1% of total financial services products, but the ongoing Bitcoin rally can reinvigorate the crypto industry.
Investors were primarily upset that SoFi maintained its guidance rather than raising it. SoFi typically raises its guidance after delivering results, so the lack of a raise stood out.
SoFi CEO Anthony Noto said the company did not raise its guidance because it anticipated two Fed rate cuts when setting guidance. Now, the firm expects zero Fed rate cuts this year, which has led to guidance remaining unchanged.
In the meantime, SoFi's other product segments produced exceptional growth, with SoFi Money up by 34% year over year. That was the smallest growth rate across SoFi's seven product categories. Overall revenue increased by 43% year over year, while net income more than doubled.
SoFi is growing faster than traditional banks while expanding its profit margins. Its lack of physical banks can eventually result in higher margins than the banking giants', since its digital banking model has less overhead. SoFi's Q1 results strengthened its long-term investment thesis, with the current dip presenting a buying opportunity.
Before you buy stock in Sezzle, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Sezzle wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 11, 2026. *
Marc Guberti has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin and Sezzle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"SoFi’s refusal to raise guidance is a prudent admission that higher-for-longer interest rates are compressing the net interest margins essential for their lending-heavy business model."
The article presents a classic 'growth at any price' narrative, but it ignores the macro-sensitivity of these fintech models. Sezzle’s 6.1% merchant fee is aggressive; in a high-interest environment, merchants will eventually push back on these 'take rates' to protect their own margins. While SoFi’s pivot to a digital-first bank is structurally sound, the market’s reaction to their guidance is rational, not irrational. By failing to raise guidance despite record growth, management is signaling that the cost of capital is finally biting into their lending margins. I am neutral on the sector; the growth is real, but the valuation compression is inevitable as liquidity tightens.
If interest rates stabilize or decline, SoFi’s net interest margin (NIM) could expand significantly, turning their current 'stagnant' guidance into a massive beat that triggers a rapid valuation re-rating.
"SoFi's selloff ignores how sustained high rates enhance NIMs while record diversification across products de-risks the platform."
SoFi's Q1 demolished expectations with 43% YoY revenue growth, net income more than doubling, and records across 14.7 million members and all seven product lines—including a nascent $239M crypto segment amid Bitcoin's rally. The 15% post-earnings drop and YTD 40% decline stem from unchanged guidance, but CEO Noto's explanation (fewer Fed cuts than anticipated) is bullish: prolonged high rates boost net interest margins for lending. Digital model scales with lower opex than traditional banks, strengthening the multi-year thesis. This dip screams buying opportunity vs. growth trajectory.
If high rates persist alongside economic slowdown, SoFi's personal loan and student loan portfolios could face higher delinquencies and provisions, eroding recent profitability gains and member engagement.
"Both companies are growing fast, but the article ignores that Sezzle's unit economics depend on low defaults while SoFi's guidance hold signals management expects margin compression, not expansion."
The article conflates two very different stories. Sezzle's 48% subscriber growth and 37.9% net margin are real, but BNPL is structurally challenged—merchant fees of 6.1% are unsustainable if competition intensifies or credit losses spike during a downturn. SoFi's 43% revenue growth is impressive, but the article glosses over the elephant: crypto revenue ($239.5M) is 1% of mix today but highly volatile. More critically, SoFi maintained guidance despite record results because Fed rate cuts evaporated—that's a margin headwind the article downplays. Neither stock is a screaming buy at current levels; both face cyclical and competitive pressures the article minimizes.
Sezzle's margin expansion could collapse if charge-offs rise materially in a recession, and SoFi's crypto tailwind is a sugar high that masks slowing core lending growth in a higher-for-longer rate environment.
"Near-term upside hinges on regulatory clarity and favorable funding costs; without those, valuations risk multiple compression despite growth."
The article leans into a bullish fintech narrative—Sezzle's subscriber growth, SoFi's rising product suite, crypto revival—without addressing key headwinds. In 2026 the macro backdrop matters: higher-for-longer rates pressure consumer credit, forcing BNPL players to compete on price and risk, while merchant take rates could compress as competition intensifies. Regulatory risk around consumer lending/payments and crypto remains material. SoFi's profitability still hinges on funding costs and mix; crypto exposure adds volatility. Valuations in many fintechs price in a sustained re-rating, but execution risk and crowding into a narrow subset could cap upside. The risk-reward looks skewed to the downside in the near term.
Devil's advocate: The BNPL and crypto tailwinds could persist if consumer demand remains robust and funding costs stay favorable, and a rebound in rates could actually improve SoFi's margins; thus the downside case may be overstated.
"SoFi's potential net interest margin expansion is likely to be offset by rising credit loss provisions as the consumer credit cycle deteriorates."
Grok, your focus on SoFi’s NIM expansion ignores the credit quality degradation inherent in a 'higher-for-longer' environment. You are treating SoFi like a traditional bank, but their personal loan book is heavily weighted toward prime/near-prime borrowers who are increasingly sensitive to debt-service ratios. If unemployment ticks up, those NIM gains will be wiped out by increased provision for credit losses. We aren't just looking at rate sensitivity; we are looking at a potential systemic credit cycle turn.
"Sezzle's margins and growth demonstrate superior unit economics that peers lack, making it more resilient than portrayed."
Claude, your BNPL sustainability critique misses Sezzle's edge: 37.9% net margins post-48% subscriber growth signal sticky 6.1% merchant take rates and efficient scaling, unlike loss-making peers like Affirm. Competition intensifies, but zero-interest plans lock in loyalty amid softening consumer spend. SoFi's guidance caution is prudent, not fatal—pairing with Sezzle diversifies fintech exposure nicely.
"Margin expansion and subscriber growth mask timing risk: credit losses follow rate cycles with a lag, and both SoFi and Sezzle are priced for flawless execution through a potential downturn."
Grok conflates margin expansion with credit resilience. Yes, SoFi's NIM widens in a higher-rate environment—but Gemini's point stands: personal loan delinquencies lag rate hikes by 12–18 months. Sezzle's 37.9% net margin assumes current charge-off rates hold; BNPL defaults historically spike in downturns. Neither panelist has quantified the provision expense elasticity if unemployment rises 50bps. That's the real test of sustainability, not subscriber growth.
"SoFi's NIM upside isn't guaranteed; funding costs and loan loss provisions can offset margin gains in a higher-rate environment, and digital-deposits alone may not meaningfully reduce funding costs without sustained inflows."
Gemini's emphasis on SoFi's NIM widening in a higher-rate regime risks overlooking funding-cost volatility and deposit betas, which can erode margins quickly if liquidity tightens or wholesale funding costs spike. Even with improved margin on lending, a rising unemployment backdrop could trigger credit provisions that swamp the gains, and SoFi's digital-bank strategy may not meaningfully reduce funding costs without sustained deposit inflows. This risk deserves a focused stress test.
Panelists agree that while fintech growth is real, both Sezzle and SoFi face significant headwinds, including macroeconomic pressures and competitive challenges. The consensus is that current valuations may not be sustainable.
Diversification into different fintech segments, as suggested by Grok, to mitigate risks.
Increased unemployment leading to higher credit provisions and delinquencies, particularly for SoFi's personal loan book and Sezzle's BNPL model.