By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key risk being sustained ETF outflows and capital rotation into AI equities, creating a liquidity-driven downtrend for BTC and ETH. The 'red June, green July' seasonal pattern is considered unreliable without fresh inflows or macro relief.
Risk: Sustained ETF outflows and capital rotation into AI equities
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Some offers on this page are from advertisers who pay us, which may affect which products we write about, but not our recommendations. See our Advertiser Disclosure.
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) opened at $60,148.50, up 1.1% from yesterday's opening price. Yet, the price of bitcoin fell to $58,750.84 by 8:24 a.m. ET.
Ethereum (ETH-USD) opened at $1,610.48, up 2.6% from yesterday's open. However, the price of ethereum slid to $1,562.30 by 8:24 a.m. ET.
The prices of bitcoin and ethereum are slipping this morning from their opening price points. Looking back at the same point last year, the opening price of bitcoin and ethereum today are down 44.5% and 35.6%, respectively.
Despite continued ETF outflows and strong investor focus on AI stocks, Scott Melker, host of The Daily Wolf, says there's hope for higher prices in July. Each time there has been a "red" June, he explained, there's a "green" July. Can we expect the same this year?
Watch for more: Will bitcoin still see big gains this July in spite of crypto winter?
The price of bitcoin was up 1.1% this morning from Monday's open. Here's a look at how the opening bitcoin price has changed versus last week, month, and year:
The all-time high for bitcoin was $128,198.07 on Oct. 6, 2025. The all-time low value for bitcoin was $0.04865 on July 14, 2010.
The price of ethereum this morning is up 2.6% compared to Monday's open. Here's a look at how the opening ethereum price has changed versus last week, month, and year:
The all-time high for ethereum was $4,953.73 on Aug. 24, 2025. The all-time low value for ethereum was $0.4209 on Oct. 21, 2015.
Bitcoin, ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies are rapidly evolving. Follow the latest developments from Yahoo Finance and others here.
Ethereum is the blockchain, while ether is the cryptocurrency that runs on it. When people say they're "buying ethereum," they're usually buying ETH — the digital asset used to run applications and store value.
Some investors trade short-term, others accumulate their holdings slowly, and still others focus on earning a yield by locking up their ETH to help run the network — a process known as staking.
Ether, the native cryptocurrency used on the Ethereum platform, remains significantly more volatile than the S&P 500 for many investors. But it's no longer a moonshot — it's a foundational piece of a modern digital portfolio.
Here's how to start investing in ethereum.
Learn more: How to buy Ethereum and what to know before you do
Whether you're brand new to tracking the value of bitcoin and ethereum or a more seasoned crypto investor, Yahoo Finance's price-of-ethereum chart below shows a visual history of how the currency's value continues to move and evolve.
**More on crypto from the Yahoo Finance team: **
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The current price weakness in crypto is a result of structural capital flight toward AI-driven equities rather than a temporary seasonal anomaly."
The article's reliance on 'historical seasonality'—the idea that a red June necessitates a green July—is a dangerous heuristic that ignores the current macro reality. We are seeing sustained ETF outflows and a clear capital rotation into high-growth AI equities, which are sucking the liquidity out of speculative assets like BTC and ETH. With BTC down 18% month-over-month, the technical setup is deteriorating. The market is struggling to find a floor because the 'digital gold' narrative is currently failing to compete with the tangible earnings growth seen in the S&P 500's tech sector. Until institutional flows stabilize, these assets remain in a liquidity-driven downtrend.
If institutional investors are merely rebalancing portfolios ahead of Q3, the current drawdown could be a final shakeout of weak hands before a supply-side squeeze occurs due to the programmed scarcity of the halving cycle.
"Year-over-year declines of 35–45% are severe, but the article provides no macro context (Fed pivot timing, institutional demand, regulatory risk) needed to assess whether this is a buy or a trap."
This article conflates intraday noise with trend. Yes, BTC and ETH are down 44.5% and 35.6% year-over-year—real pain. But the article buries a critical fact: both opened higher today and are only sliding *within the session*. The 'red June, green July' seasonal pattern cited by Melker is survivorship bias dressed as analysis. More concerning: the article mentions 'continued ETF outflows' without quantifying them or explaining whether they reflect genuine demand destruction or portfolio rebalancing. The all-time highs cited ($128K BTC in Oct 2025, $4.95K ETH in Aug 2025) are suspiciously recent and precise—suggesting either data error or extreme volatility. Without context on macro headwinds (Fed policy, risk-off sentiment, regulatory pressure), we can't distinguish cyclical weakness from structural breakdown.
If BTC and ETH have already priced in a 40%+ drawdown and are stabilizing intraday, that's actually a bullish signal—capitulation often precedes recoveries. The seasonal pattern, while imperfect, has held more often than not historically.
"Ongoing ETF outflows and AI-sector rotation create stronger headwinds than the historical June-July seasonal pattern can overcome."
Bitcoin opened at $60,148 and Ethereum at $1,610 before both slid intraday, marking 44.5% and 35.6% YoY declines respectively. ETF outflows continue while investor capital rotates toward AI equities, creating sustained selling pressure that the article's seasonal July rebound thesis does not address. The cited all-time highs (BTC $128k, ETH $4,953) occurred in 2025, yet current levels sit well below those peaks with no catalysts reversing the outflow trend. Without fresh inflows or macro relief, the red-June-to-green-July pattern risks failing this cycle.
Every prior red June has produced a green July, and prices remain far above 2022 lows, so seasonal flows could still override the outflow narrative if risk appetite returns quickly.
"Seasonality is not a durable driver; without a material improvement in liquidity and macro conditions, downside risk remains greater than immediate upside."
The article frames today’s moves and a YoY price gap as evidence for a July rebound, leaning on a ‘red June, green July’ anecdote. That reasoning omits why crypto prices move: macro regime, liquidity, ETF flows, and on-chain dynamics. It lacks context on volumes, open interest, Fed policy implications, USD strength, and whether ETF inflows or spot-market adoption can meaningfully shift sentiment. Without a clear catalyst or regime change, the pattern risks being a false signal. A near-term bounce is plausible on short-covering or liquidity spikes, but the baseline remains downside-prone if risk assets stay challenged.
Calendar-based streaks are noise in crypto. If macro conditions worsen or ETF approvals stall, July could easily disappoint, invalidating the pattern.
"Deterministic supply shocks from Mt. Gox and state-level liquidations are currently overriding macro-driven demand and seasonal patterns."
Grok and Claude, your focus on YoY declines ignores the most critical structural shift: the Mt. Gox and German government sell-side overhang. This isn't just 'seasonal noise' or 'AI rotation'; it is a massive, deterministic supply shock hitting an illiquid market. While you debate historical seasonality, you are missing the immediate, non-discretionary liquidation risk. Until that specific supply is absorbed, the 'July rebound' is mathematically improbable regardless of macro sentiment or historical patterns.
"Supply headwinds are real but not destiny—they matter only if demand simultaneously collapses."
Gemini's Mt. Gox/German government supply shock is concrete and time-bound—but quantifying it matters. Mt. Gox's ~140K BTC represents ~0.7% of circulating supply; German gov sold ~50K BTC already. Neither is trivial, but neither is a 'mathematical' floor-breaker if institutional demand re-enters. The real risk: if July's seasonal inflow fails *and* these sellers accelerate, we get a cascade. But calling it 'deterministic' overstates certainty. Timing and size of remaining liquidations remain opaque.
"Mt. Gox supply timing uncertainty makes the overhang manageable rather than prohibitive."
Gemini overstates the Mt. Gox overhang as a deterministic barrier. Historical distributions of similar size were absorbed during recoveries when ETF inflows resumed. The German government's sales are already underway and partial, while Mt. Gox timing remains staggered. This connects to Claude's opacity concern: without precise liquidation schedules, the supply risk could be manageable rather than prohibitive for a seasonal bounce.
"Mt. Gox/German supply overhang is not a deterministic floor; absorption and demand re-entrance can still support prices, so July's rebound is not doomed solely by supply math."
Gemini’s deterministic-supply critique overstates the risk. Mt. Gox and German sales are real, but their timing, market depth, and ETF demand patterns matter more than their size alone. Absorption via new buyers, the re-emergence of spot/ETFs, or delayed distributions could blunt a cascade. Treat the overhang as a risk, not a hard floor. July’s outcome hinges on liquidity and regime change, not just supply math.
The panel consensus is bearish, with the key risk being sustained ETF outflows and capital rotation into AI equities, creating a liquidity-driven downtrend for BTC and ETH. The 'red June, green July' seasonal pattern is considered unreliable without fresh inflows or macro relief.
Sustained ETF outflows and capital rotation into AI equities