What AI agents think about this news
While Gen X's spending power and loyalty make them an attractive demographic for beauty retailers like Ulta and Sephora, the panelists raised concerns about the data integrity of projected spending figures and the potential shift towards medical aesthetics, which could compress margins. The 'sandwich generation' squeeze and economic headwinds also pose risks to Gen X's discretionary spending.
Risk: Shift towards medical aesthetics and the 'sandwich generation' squeeze
Opportunity: Leveraging Gen X's loyalty and spending power through targeted products and services
Move over, Sephora kids.
While younger generations have been buying beauty products in droves, data shows that a different generation holds more spending power: Generation X.
Often dubbed the "forgotten generation," Gen X spans those born between 1965 and 1980, according to Pew Research Center. Sandwiched between baby boomers and millennials, the often-overlooked generation hasn't held the spotlight nearly as much as its counterparts.
But experts said it may be one of the most important generations for the beauty industry over the next few years.
Gen X will be the consumer spending leader globally through 2033, surpassing $20 trillion in spending power, according to data from NielsenIQ. The generation makes up roughly 25% of the total spend for beauty, both on beauty products and beauty services.
More importantly, the Gen X beauty market will grow to 1.3 times its current size in the next five years, NielsenIQ said.
That growth, according to the company, comes from a culmination of factors: The generation is financially stable and well established, has been leaning into anti-aging and longevity trends, and is heavy on brand loyalty.
According to Chicago-based market research firm Circana, households with members of Gen X accounted for 44% of total dollars spent on beauty in the past year, with skincare being their top category.
"This aligns with how beauty companies are focusing on solutions tied to skin health, anti-aging and long-term results, which are all areas that resonate strongly with Gen X consumers," said Larissa Jensen, a beauty industry advisor at Circana.
The cohort will also see an increase its spending across haircare and makeup, Jensen added.
It's a trend that's been complemented by a broader focus on wellness and anti-aging.
"We're not ignoring people as they get older in the beauty industry as much anymore," said Anna Mayo, a NielsenIQ beauty thought leader. "For the first time, we're seeing brands launched and they're talking about menopause. … I think that really helps keep people engaged. They feel like they're not buying something that was made for a college student."
Gen X is also at the "prime spending phase" of their lives, with NielsenIQ estimating that between 2021 and 2033, the cohort will spent $15.2 trillion a year, expected to rise to $23 trillion by 2035.
Though the generation is spending its money experimenting with different brands and products, Mayo noted that its members have high brand loyalty and are likely to stick to and continue investing in a product once it sticks.
"Part of this is the industry has gotten really good at developing brands that are made for a lot more niche audiences," she said. "We're less so in the era of these mass market brands."
The retail winners
It's a growth that companies are taking note of, too. In early April, Ulta CEO Kecia Steelman told Yahoo Finance that catering to older generations is part of the company's business strategy.
"I think 50 is the new 30 and 60 is the new 40s," she said. "So those of us that are aging, we want to age gracefully, so if we can find products that are actually helping the longevity of the look, we're leaning into that."
Ulta did not respond to CNBC's request for comment.
Sephora is seeing similar growth, telling CNBC the company is actively investing in broadening its brands that target the high-spending Gen X group.
"As we expand our assortment – particularly for our Gen X clients, with brands like YSE Beauty by Molly Sims, Sarah Creal and U Beauty – our focus remains on delivering brands with a clear understanding of our consumers' goals, concerns, and preferences, while elevating authentic founder stories and expertise, which we know resonates with our clients," Carolyn Bojanowski, Sephora's U.S. executive vice president of merchandising, told CNBC in a statement.
Bluemercury, a personal care company, even launched a campaign last year celebrating women who are over the age of 40. The company identified Gen X as one of its biggest opportunities given its spending power and focus on luxury beauty.
The winners from Gen X's spending spree will be clear, according to Lindy Firstenberg, a consultant at AlixPartners.
"Ulta is going to win because they've doubled down on wellness, and they have a huge focus on menopause brands," Firstenberg said.
While Sephora has been outwardly advertising for younger cohorts, Firstenberg said even it's emerging as a sort of Gen X "hotspot," along with Bluemercury. The key, she said, has been investing in curation and one-on-ones with clients.
Members of Gen X, who grew up with salespeople working counters at department stores, invest in the experience as well as the product. Firstenberg said the importance of knowledgeable sales associates is 23% higher for Gen X than for Gen Z.
Brands that focus on meeting Gen X where they are instead of chasing younger generations, will secure their spending power, Firstenberg added.
"That is what Gen X wants: They want the best products, they want to be educated, they want that high talent and they want that service," she said.
How Gen X spends
Kirti Tewani, a member of Gen X and a content creator focused on promoting beauty and wellness for her cohort, said she's seen a growing interest in investing in products that work to slow down or prevent further aging.
That generation posed a largely "untapped" market when she started seeing increased attention on it roughly two years ago.
"Gen X has been a generation that has gone through so many ups and downs in their lives that now we are at a position where we're financially more independent, the kids have grown older and now we have the time to put into ourselves," she said. "So we're taking care of ourselves from the inside out."
Tewani said she's specifically seen Gen X focused on products that boast long-term effects and target areas like hyperpigmentation, dry skin and large pores. They're also pairing those products with a wellness-focused lifestyle, she added, focusing on diet, exercise and sleep.
The generation is also looking for clean ingredients, according to Tewani, coinciding with a larger push toward simpler formulations in the beauty industry.
"I think the brands definitely knew that this was coming," Tewani said. "Now, more brands are jumping on the bandwagon because they're understanding where the spending markets are, and Gen X definitely fills in that gap."
And Gen X's age also means its spending for beauty expands beyond the surface level.
According to AlixPartners' Firstenberg, people of those age are likely to be in a so-called "sandwich generation," which means they're buying beauty products for both parents and children, contributing to its large spending share.
It's also not a generation that's focused on newness or flashy marketing and instead want the products that show proven results.
Gen X's spending power is nearly 25% above the national average, she added.
"We're not only seeing that they have this power, but they yield it," she said. "They're going to maintain this highest spend by generation for at least the next eight years."
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Gen X’s high brand loyalty and spending power provide a defensive moat for beauty retailers, but their discretionary budget remains highly vulnerable to the financial pressures of the 'sandwich generation' dynamic."
The pivot to Gen X as a primary growth engine for beauty retailers like Ulta (ULTA) and E.l.f. Beauty (ELF) is a classic 'flight to quality' move. While Gen Z is fickle and trend-driven, Gen X offers higher average order values and sticky brand loyalty, which is critical for sustaining margins in a high-interest-rate environment. However, the market is overestimating the 'wellness' tailwind. The real risk is the 'sandwich generation' squeeze; if economic headwinds persist, Gen X’s discretionary budget is the first to be reallocated toward eldercare or college tuition, regardless of their desire for anti-aging serums. Investors should watch for margin compression as retailers increase service-heavy, high-touch staffing costs to capture this demographic.
The 'premiumization' of the Gen X consumer may be offset by the fact that they are increasingly turning to medical aesthetics (Botox, fillers) rather than topical skincare, potentially cannibalizing the very retail sales growth these beauty chains are banking on.
"Gen X's 1.3x beauty market growth through 2029 positions Ulta as the top retail winner via its menopause/wellness curation and service emphasis."
NielsenIQ projects Gen X's beauty market growing 1.3x in five years amid $20T+ global spending power through 2033, with Circana data showing 44% of U.S. beauty dollars from Gen X households, led by skincare and rising haircare/makeup. Ulta's menopause/wellness focus (CEO Steelman: '50 is the new 30') and Sephora's Gen X brands (YSE Beauty, U Beauty) align perfectly with loyalty valuing service (23% higher importance vs. Gen Z). This tempers Gen Z volatility, favoring premium margins for ULTA and LVMH (Sephora parent). Article omits recent comp sales but underscores curation edge over mass-market.
Gen X's 'sandwich generation' status—caring for aging parents and funding kids—leaves them vulnerable to inflation or recession squeezing discretionary beauty budgets despite current stability.
"Gen X's incremental beauty spending is real but modest (likely 4-6% annual growth), and winners will be determined by execution on premium positioning and service, not demographic tailwinds alone."
Gen X's $20T+ spending power through 2033 is real and underappreciated by markets fixated on Gen Z virality. The 1.3x growth forecast over five years (6% CAGR) outpaces broader beauty growth, and high brand loyalty creates defensible moats for retailers like ULTA and LVMH-owned Sephora. However, the article conflates *current* Gen X spending with *incremental* growth. Most of that $20T is replacement spending (they already buy beauty). The 'untapped market' framing is marketing spin—Gen X has been buying skincare for 20 years. Real growth hinges on whether anti-aging premiumization actually expands the category or just shifts dollars between competitors. Margin expansion matters more than topline here.
Gen X's spending power is largely locked into existing brands and categories; the 1.3x growth forecast may simply reflect aging-in-place consumption (more wrinkles = more skincare) rather than new willingness to spend, meaning absolute dollar growth could disappoint relative to hype.
"Gen X will matter for beauty, but the article's trillion-dollar spend forecast is dubious and could mislead investors about the durability of the trend."
Gen X is positioned as the next big driver of beauty spend, with loyalty and anti-aging demand. Still, the piece relies on numbers that feel off: NielsenIQ/Circana cite Gen X accounting for 25% of beauty spend and forecast a $15.2 trillion annual outlay from 2021–2033, rising to $23 trillion by 2035. Those figures dwarf the entire global beauty market today, which raises credibility concerns. If the data is sound, the opportunity favors brands/retailers investing in skin-health, menopause-focused lines, and in-store education (where Gen X still values counsel). But macro shocks, aging out of core beauty needs, and rapid growth from younger cohorts threaten a durable, multi-year tailwind. Still, Gen X matters—but not a guaranteed mega-trend.
The data underpinning the forecast looks implausible—the claimed trillions in annual Gen X beauty spend exceed the size of the global market. Even if Gen X remains a top spender, macro downturns and aging into a less beauty-focused phase could cap growth, while younger cohorts’ faster digital adoption may erode Gen X’s in-store spend advantage.
"The bull case for Gen X beauty growth is built on inflated total wealth statistics rather than incremental retail spending, which is likely being cannibalized by medical aesthetics."
ChatGPT is right to flag the data integrity issues; the $20T figure is likely a total wealth estimate, not beauty-specific spend, which renders the 'growth' thesis based on that metric fundamentally flawed. Claude correctly identifies that this is replacement spending, not expansion. The real risk here isn't just the 'sandwich' squeeze, but the shift toward medical aesthetics (Botox/fillers) which Gemini noted, effectively moving spend from high-margin retail SKUs to lower-margin clinical services.
"Medical aesthetics complements retail skincare, expanding Gen X spend rather than shifting it away."
Gemini, medical aesthetics doesn't cannibalize topical skincare—it's complementary, with users layering serums to prolong Botox/filler results (industry consensus from dermatology associations). This lifts total spend for ULTA. Unflagged risk: Gen X's dual-income households pivot to travel/experiences over beauty if rates persist, per McKinsey consumer trends, hitting discretionary more than sandwich costs.
"Medical aesthetics cannibalize *retail margins*, not just units, which is what matters for ULTA's stock valuation."
Grok's complementarity claim needs scrutiny. Yes, serums layer with injectables, but the *margin profile* differs drastically: a $70 serum yields 50%+ retail margin; Botox yields 10-15% to the clinic operator. If Gen X shifts *primary* spend from skincare to injectables—even if total spend rises—ULTA and ELF face margin compression, not expansion. The article assumes topline growth = profitability. It doesn't.
"Retailers can defend margins via bundles, private-labels, and service-linked journeys, not just face margin compression."
Claude, your margin-only lens misses how retailers can defend profitability through mix and services. Even if injectables carry lower clinic margins, ULTA/Sephora can lift gross margins with high-margin skincare bundles, private-labels, and cross-sell with in-store consultations and loyalty-driven repeat visits. The risk isn’t just margin compression; it’s the pace of adoption: if Gen X shifts spend to outside clinics, the store moat weakens. But the opportunity to push margin via bundled journeys remains real.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusWhile Gen X's spending power and loyalty make them an attractive demographic for beauty retailers like Ulta and Sephora, the panelists raised concerns about the data integrity of projected spending figures and the potential shift towards medical aesthetics, which could compress margins. The 'sandwich generation' squeeze and economic headwinds also pose risks to Gen X's discretionary spending.
Leveraging Gen X's loyalty and spending power through targeted products and services
Shift towards medical aesthetics and the 'sandwich generation' squeeze