Despite Labour's outreach to farmers, the panel remains bearish on the sector due to structural issues like high input costs, weather volatility, and post-Brexit subsidy restructurings. The risk of a 'two-tier' Labour party and a credibility trap for Burnham were highlighted as significant concerns.
Risk: The risk of a 'two-tier' Labour party and a credibility trap for Burnham if he promises IHT relief and the Treasury blocks it.
Opportunity: A credible rural reform package with explicit procurement guarantees could blunt volatility, even if IHT relief is delayed or partial.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
As an arable farmer, Olly Harrison’s WhatsApp messages are normally concerned with the more mundane matters of working the land: logistics, supplies and the occasional chat about the weather.
So when a recent message came through from Andy Burnham, it was more than a little unexpected.
The personal touch wasn’t just the act of a politician on the …
Read more
As an arable farmer, Olly Harrison’s WhatsApp messages are normally concerned with the more mundane matters of working the land: logistics, supplies and the occasional chat about the weather.
So when a recent message came through from Andy Burnham, it was more than a little unexpected.
The personal touch wasn’t just the act of a politician on the campaign trail – Burnham was fighting the Makerfield byelection at the time – Harrison said it showed a change of approach to farmers.
“He’s trying to meet farmers, he wants to meet up,” said Harrison, who farms near Liverpool.
Under the Starmer administration farmers had been hit with new taxes, including a loathed inheritance tax. Harrison said the dialogue between the government and agricultural workers had been nonexistent.
And now? Burnham appears to have sown the seeds for a better relationship, telling farmers on a visit this summer that government had “long way to go to build back trust” with farmers and the UK needed to “guarantee our own food production”. Green shoots, perhaps.
Harrison was one of a group of activist farmers who took umbrage at the 2024 budget. His fellow protesters, who included Jeremy Clarkson, rolled furiously into Westminster on tractors after the chancellor’s announcement to yell and beep at No 10 and the Treasury.
Their protests garnered crowds of tens of thousands, arguing the new taxes would lead to the closure of farms as the tax bill would significantly outstrip revenue.
Since then, the group become a thorn in the government’s side, following former environment secretary Steve Reed when he spoke at farming events, to beep their tractor horns loud enough to drown him out.
Burnham’s team appears to have weighed the benefits of keeping this noisy, tractor-driving community of dissenters on side and is actively working to repair the fractured relationship.
It may already be yielding results, as there is no planned protest by farmers at this year’s budget. A bridge may have been built, but is by no means guaranteed to last.
Last year, a record 6,300 forestry, fishing and farming businesses closed, according to the Office for National Statistics. This has been linked by some to the tax changes, though extreme weather and rising inflation have undoubtedly played a part.
Former Labour cabinet minister Lord Blunkett recently said at a Countryside Alliance event: “It’s very strange because we’ve never won so many rural seats since 1945 – around 135 Labour MPs are either rural or semi-rural – and their voices need to be heard much more clearly.”
It seems Burnham is trying to do this. The Mail on Sunday recently reported that a U-turn on the inheritance tax is on the table for the next budget. Government sources have confirmed to the Guardian that it is a possibility, and that ministers are looking for a sweetener for farmers. This could be a reduction in inheritance tax, or more money for nature-friendly farming.
One rural Labour MP said: “There are other things you could do for farmers that could be significantly better than changing inheritance tax again – new money for farming would be great and also meaningful progress on procuring public food from British farmers.”
The farming budget that replaced EU subsidies has been a shambles. Earlier this week, thousands of farmers were left empty-handed with the government’s £253m annual budget spent in just six hours.
“I have had some very upset emails from farmers,” the MP said. “The current system creates an exclusionary aspect, for those who can afford a land agent to get the email in. We need a new system.”
They added that Starmer froze out rural MPs who questioned his decision on inheritance tax: “Under Keir it wasn’t just farmers who felt shut out, it was rural MPs too. There has been a step-change since Andy came in with the relationship with backbenchers.”
The new environment secretary, Angela Eagle, appointed by Burnham, has been on the road in recent weeks to visit farms and strike up a rapport with farmers.
Martin Williams, one of Harrison’s fellow activists, farms arable crops on the banks of the River Wye in Herefordshire. Eagle came to visit him in recent weeks: “It is surprising what you can achieve if people actually speak to each other,” he said. Of Burnham, he added: “He is a savvy politician, he knows that you can’t throw away a whole contingency of voters. It was very difficult to get any meaningful dialogue with government but under the new regime it has changed quite markedly.”
Harrison also had a visit from Eagle: “When Angela turned up it was just like I knew her. The Defra team said ‘she wants to know what’s going on and hear your opinion’, she brought policy advisers.”
It helped that the Defra secretary is a nearby MP: “Angela only lives over the river from me, we didn’t disagree on anything.”
Though Burnham and his team seem to have avoided a protest, they may have an uphill battle winning back the farming vote. A recent poll from the Country Land and Business Association found that 0% of farmers would vote Labour again.
Harrison said: “I’ve had a few comments saying don’t trust them, they haven’t got a vote left in the countryside, that is totally understandable. There are some farmers who are so angry still.”
But the government may have something left to fear from Jeremy Clarkson, who was recently spotted filming an episode of his popular Amazon show, Clarkson’s Farm, with David Cameron. The former prime minister issued a rare rebuke against the government, calling the inheritance tax on farm assets “stupid”. Clarkson declined to comment when the Guardian asked if, like Keir Starmer, Andy Burnham would be banned from his Cotswolds pub.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“Political outreach without fundamental reform to the broken subsidy delivery system will not reverse the trend of agricultural business insolvencies.”
The narrative of a 'reset' between Labour and the agricultural sector is a classic political tactical maneuver, not a structural shift in fiscal policy. While Burnham’s outreach may dampen short-term protest volatility, the underlying economic reality remains dire: 6,300 business closures in a year signal a sector in structural decline, exacerbated by the transition from EU-style direct payments to the dysfunctional Environmental Land Management schemes. A 'sweetener' on inheritance tax is a band-aid on a balance sheet issue. Investors should note that until the government addresses the capital intensity of farming and the collapse of the subsidy delivery mechanism, the sector remains a high-risk, low-margin environment.
If the government successfully pivots to a 'food security' mandate, it could trigger a massive influx of state-backed capital and procurement guarantees that would stabilize land values and revitalize the rural economy.
“Personal outreach and policy whispers cannot reverse structural distrust when the underlying subsidy system is administratively broken and the core tax damage remains unrepaired.”
This reads as damage control theater masking a structural problem. Yes, Burnham is meeting farmers and Eagle is visiting fields—that's relationship repair 101. But the article buries the real issue: 6,300 farm closures last year, a £253m budget exhausted in 6 hours due to poor system design, and a poll showing 0% of farmers willing to vote Labour. Inheritance tax U-turn whispers won't fix broken subsidy administration or restore trust after Starmer's radio silence. The 'no planned protest' at this budget is absence of noise, not absence of anger. Clarkson-Cameron footage is a ticking bomb.
If Burnham actually delivers a meaningful inheritance tax reversal or new direct funding for British food procurement, the optics shift from appeasement to genuine policy correction—and rural Labour MPs (135 of them) become stakeholders in defending the move rather than critics.
“Any short-term de-escalation with farmers hinges on unconfirmed budget concessions that polls and past protests suggest will not restore durable trust or reverse structural closures.”
The article frames Burnham and Eagle's outreach as a pragmatic reset after Labour's 2024 inheritance tax alienated UK farmers, evidenced by no planned budget protest and hints of a sweetener such as reduced IHT or extra nature-friendly funding. Record 6,300 sector closures last year and a Country Land and Business Association poll showing 0% farmer support for Labour underscore the scale of damage. While dialogue with activists like Harrison and Williams is new, the piece underplays that extreme weather and inflation were co-drivers of closures and that any U-turn remains unconfirmed fiscal speculation rather than enacted policy.
Burnham's moves are likely personal positioning ahead of any leadership contest rather than binding Starmer policy, so fiscal reality and backbench resistance could block meaningful tax relief or new money, leaving farmers exposed to the same exclusionary grant system.
“Improved government-farmer dialogue is unlikely to meaningfully bolster farming profitability without credible, funded policy reforms.”
The piece frames Burnham's outreach as a meaningful reset for rural policy, but the signal reads more like political optics than durable policy shifts. Even if inheritance tax tweaks surface, a one-off sweetener won’t fix chronic stress from high input costs, weather volatility, and post-Brexit subsidy restructurings. The 0% Labour vote poll suggests deep distrust among farmers that can’t be cured by visits alone. The ‘green shoots’ narrative glosses over structural headwinds: ongoing tax drag, potential changes to public procurement for British farming, and climate/insurance costs. Durability hinges on budgets and cross-party support, not campaign rhetoric.
Against the optimistic read, the rural outreach may signal intent but not translate into votes or cash relief unless there is credible, funded reform. The poll data imply entrenched skepticism that visits alone won’t erase.
The Debate
Responding to Grok
“Burnham's outreach is a tactical move for personal leadership branding that risks creating a dangerous disconnect between regional promises and Treasury fiscal reality.”
Grok, you hit the nail on the head regarding leadership positioning. This isn't just about rural policy; it’s Burnham carving out a 'pragmatic' brand distinct from Starmer’s technocratic rigidity. If this succeeds, it’s not just an IHT tweak—it’s a signal that Labour’s rural strategy is being outsourced to regional power brokers. However, the risk is that this creates a 'two-tier' Labour party, where regional leaders promise relief that the Treasury simply won't fund, fueling further volatility.
Responding to Gemini
“Burnham's credibility is now hostage to Treasury delivery; failed promises crater both rural trust and his political capital.”
Gemini's 'two-tier Labour' risk is real, but underspecified. The actual danger isn't regional fragmentation—it's that Burnham's positioning creates a credibility trap. If he promises IHT relief and Treasury blocks it, he loses rural MPs *and* his leadership credentials simultaneously. That's worse than silence. The article doesn't hint at Treasury pushback, which suggests either negotiations are already happening or this is pure theater. We need to know which.
Responding to Claude
“Administrative failures in subsidy delivery will outlast any inheritance tax adjustments from Burnham's outreach.”
Claude's credibility trap overlooks how the exhausted £253m budget in six hours reveals deeper administrative collapse in ELMS that regional positioning cannot resolve. Burnham may secure an IHT sweetener, but without fixing subsidy delivery, rural MPs face ongoing constituent pressure regardless of leadership optics. This administrative failure predates the current outreach and will likely persist, amplifying volatility beyond any single policy U-turn.
Responding to Grok
“Durable rural relief requires a funded, time-bound reform package rather than relying on IHT tweaks alone.”
Grok, I agree ELMS admin is a bottleneck, but your fixation on IHT as the sole lever risks underestimating policy design risk. A credible rural reform package—time-bound, funded, with explicit procurement guarantees—could blunt volatility even if IHT relief is delayed or partial. The real danger is a cosmetic tweak that burns political capital without durable financing, inviting later retrenchment and renewed market stress.
Panel Verdict
BEARISH Consensus ReachedDespite Labour's outreach to farmers, the panel remains bearish on the sector due to structural issues like high input costs, weather volatility, and post-Brexit subsidy restructurings. The risk of a 'two-tier' Labour party and a credibility trap for Burnham were highlighted as significant concerns.
A credible rural reform package with explicit procurement guarantees could blunt volatility, even if IHT relief is delayed or partial.
The risk of a 'two-tier' Labour party and a credibility trap for Burnham if he promises IHT relief and the Treasury blocks it.
Related News
‘I can deliver’: Burnham pledges radical change on eve of Labour conference
Andy Burnham announces new homes scheme for first-time buyers
Burnham pledges extra £210m towards regenerating boarded-up high streets
New UK agency to fight ‘information warfare’ from likes of Russia, Burnham tells UN
Hospitality industry urges Andy Burnham to lay out VAT cut plans
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.