By Maksym Misichenko · Yahoo Finance ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel agrees that the article misses crucial aspects of RMDs, including their impact on Medicare premiums and the strategic use of QCDs and Roth conversions. They highlight the 'sequence of returns' risk and the potential for RMDs to accelerate wealth erosion.
Risk: Sequence of returns risk and the 'tax torpedo' effect of IRMAA surcharges on Medicare premiums.
Opportunity: Strategic use of Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) and Roth conversions to mitigate RMD impacts.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below.
Parting with your savings in retirement can be hard to do. But if you are 73 and have a traditional IRA or 401(k) you have no choice, thanks to required minimum distributions, or RMDs.
With inflation rising — it reached 3.1% in March in the most recent consumer price index — gasoline prices increasing and stocks fluctuating, withdrawing from your retirement savings accounts can cause anxiety.
This is particularly true if you are among the retirees increasingly relying on tax-deferred accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs to get by, reports CBS News. Withdraw too much and you may outlive your money. Withdraw too little and you may be on the hook for a penalty.
Don't Miss:
That's why it’s important to know the correct withdrawal amount. If you have $1 million in your traditional tax-deferred retirement savings accounts, here's the total RMDs you're required to take.
RMDs are required for most tax-deferred retirement savings accounts including 401(k)s, IRAs and 403(b)s, according to the IRS. The first of these withdrawals must be taken by April 1 of the year following your 73rd birthday and every year thereafter.
The amount you're required to withdraw is calculated based on a formula that includes your account balance and a life expectancy factor provided by the IRS known as the uniform lifetime table. The formula, according to the IRS, is the following:
Trending: See What AI Could Build for Your Portfolio — Try a Custom Index Now
Here's how much you will be required to withdraw at different ages if you have $1 million in tax-deferred retirement accounts:
At age 73, your life expectancy factor is 26.5 and as a result you are required to withdraw $37,736.
At age 75, your life expectancy factor is 24.6 and as a result you are required to withdraw $40,650.
At age 80, your life expectancy factor is 20.2 and as a result you are required to withdraw $49,505.
As you can see the older you get the lower your life expectancy factor is and the more you're required to withdraw. The IRS wants to get paid, which is why the withdrawal rate increases.
See Also: Why Traders Are Flocking to Leveraged ETFs — And What It Means for You
The IRS doesn't care if the market is down or inflation is up, you're required to take an RMD every year after you turn 73. If you miss an RMD you are subject to a 25% penalty of the amount you were supposed to withdraw. This is a significant reduction thanks to the Secure Act 2.0; the penalty used to be 50%.
Keep in mind that RMDs are treated as ordinary income which could push you into a higher tax bracket, increase your Medicare premiums or result in a tax on your Social Security payments.
Plus if you have multiple accounts it can get complicated. While you can aggregate IRA RMD withdrawals across accounts, 401(k) withdrawals have to be calculated and processed separately, reported CBS News.
RMDs can't be avoided which is why it’s important to plan ahead for this yearly event that occurs once you turn 73.
Required minimum distributions can quickly become complicated, especially for retirees managing multiple accounts and tax considerations. Some investors work with financial advisers to help optimize withdrawal timing, reduce unnecessary tax exposure and build a more sustainable retirement income plan.
Read Next: Demand for Faster Diagnostics Is Surging — NASA- and NIH-Supported Space-Tested System Targets At-Home Lab-Quality Blood Testing
Building Wealth Across More Than Just the Market
Building a resilient portfolio means thinking beyond a single asset or market trend. Economic cycles shift, sectors rise and fall, and no one investment performs well in every environment. That's why many investors look to diversify with platforms that provide access to real estate, fixed-income opportunities, professional financial guidance, precious metals, and even self-directed retirement accounts. By spreading exposure across multiple asset classes, it becomes easier to manage risk, capture steady returns, and create long-term wealth that isn't tied to the fortunes of just one company or industry.
Connect Invest
Connect Invest is a real estate investment platform that allows investors to access short-term, fixed-income opportunities backed by a diversified portfolio of residential and commercial real estate loans. Through its Short Notes structure, investors can choose defined terms (6, 12, or 24 months) and earn monthly interest payments while gaining exposure to real estate as an asset class. For investors focused on diversification, Connect Invest may serve as one component within a broader portfolio that also includes traditional equities, fixed income, and other alternative assets—helping balance exposure across different risk and return profiles.
Mode Mobile
Mode Mobile is changing the way people interact with their phones by letting users earn money from the same apps and activities they already use every day. Instead of platforms keeping all the advertising revenue, Mode Mobile shares a portion back with users who engage with content, play games, and scroll on their devices. Named one of Deloitte's fastest-growing software companies in North America, the company has built a large beta user base and is scaling a model that turns everyday smartphone usage into a potential income stream. For investors, Mode Mobile offers exposure to the expanding mobile advertising and attention economy through a pre-IPO opportunity tied to a new approach to user monetization.
rHealth
rHealth is building a space-tested diagnostics platform designed to bring lab-quality blood testing closer to patients in minutes rather than weeks. Originally validated in collaboration with NASA for use aboard the International Space Station, the technology is now being adapted for at-home and point-of-care settings to address widespread delays in diagnostic access.
Backed by institutions including NASA and the NIH, rHealth is targeting the large global diagnostics market with a multi-test platform and a model built around devices, consumables, and software. With FDA registration in progress, the company is positioning itself as a potential shift toward faster, more decentralized healthcare testing.
Direxion
Direxion specializes in leveraged and inverse ETFs designed to help active traders express short-term market views during periods of volatility and major market events. Rather than long-term investing, these products are built for tactical use—allowing investors to take magnified bullish or bearish positions across indices, sectors, and single stocks. For experienced traders, Direxion offers a way to respond quickly to changing market conditions and act on high-conviction views with greater flexibility.
Immersed
Immersed is a spatial computing company building immersive productivity software that enables users to work across multiple virtual screens inside VR and mixed-reality environments. Its platform is used by remote workers and enterprises to create virtual workspaces that reduce reliance on traditional physical hardware while improving focus and collaboration. The company is also developing its own lightweight VR headset and AI productivity tools, positioning itself in the future-of-work and spatial computing space. Through its pre-IPO offering, Immersed is opening access to early-stage investors looking to diversify beyond traditional assets and gain exposure to emerging technologies shaping how people work.
Arrived
Backed by Jeff Bezos, Arrived Homes makes real estate investing accessible with a low barrier to entry. Investors can buy fractional shares of single-family rentals and vacation homes starting with as little as $100. This allows everyday investors to diversify into real estate, collect rental income, and build long-term wealth without needing to manage properties directly.
Masterworks
Masterworks enables investors to diversify into blue-chip art, an alternative asset class with historically low correlation to stocks and bonds. Through fractional ownership of museum-quality works by artists like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, investors gain access without the high costs or complexities of owning art outright. With hundreds of offerings and strong historical exits on select works, Masterworks adds a scarce, globally traded asset to portfolios seeking long-term diversification.
Public
Public is a multi-asset investing platform built for long-term investors who want more control, transparency, and innovation in how they grow wealth. Founded in 2019 as the first broker-dealer to offer commission-free, real-time fractional investing, Public now lets users invest in stocks, bonds, options, crypto, and more—all in one place. Its latest feature, Generated Assets, uses AI to turn a single idea into a fully customized, investable index that can be explained and backtested before committing capital. Combined with AI-powered research tools, clear explanations of market moves, and an uncapped 1% match for transferring an existing portfolio, Public positions itself as a modern platform designed to help serious investors make more informed decisions with context.
AdviserMatch
AdviserMatch is a free online tool that helps individuals connect with financial advisors based on their goals, financial situation, and investment needs. Instead of spending hours researching advisors on your own, the platform asks a few quick questions and matches you with professionals who can assist with areas like retirement planning, investment strategy, and overall financial guidance. Consultations are no-obligation, and services vary by advisor, giving investors a chance to explore whether professional advice could help improve their long-term financial plan.
Accredited Debt Relief
Accredited Debt Relief is a debt consolidation company focused on helping consumers reduce and manage unsecured debt through structured programs and personalized solutions. Having supported more than 1 million clients and helped resolve over $3 billion in debt, the company operates within the growing consumer debt relief industry, where demand continues to rise alongside record household debt levels. Its process includes a quick qualification survey, personalized program matching, and ongoing support, with eligible clients potentially reducing monthly payments by 40% or more. With industry recognition, an A+ BBB rating, and multiple customer service awards, Accredited Debt Relief positions itself as a data-driven, client-focused option for individuals seeking a more manageable path toward becoming debt-free.
Finance Advisors
Finance Advisors helps Americans approach retirement with greater clarity by connecting them to vetted, fiduciary financial advisors who specialize in tax-aware retirement planning. Rather than focusing on products or investment performance alone, the platform emphasizes strategies that account for after-tax income, withdrawal sequencing, and long-term tax efficiency—factors that can materially impact retirement outcomes. Free to use, Finance Advisors gives individuals with meaningful savings access to a level of planning sophistication historically reserved for high-net-worth households, helping reduce hidden tax risk and improve long-term financial confidence.
Image: Shutterstock
This article Have $1M Saved At 73? Here's How Much You Are Required To Withdraw In Retirement Each Year originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Forced liquidations via RMDs during market volatility create a 'mathematical trap' that can permanently erode portfolio longevity if not offset by tax-efficient strategies like QCDs."
The article frames RMDs as a static tax burden, but the real risk is 'sequence of returns' risk in a high-inflation environment. Investors are forced to liquidate assets to meet RMD quotas regardless of market performance. If a retiree is forced to sell into a 15-20% market correction to satisfy an RMD, they permanently impair their capital base, accelerating the depletion of their nest egg. The article misses the strategic pivot toward Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs), which allow those 70.5 and older to donate directly from IRAs to satisfy RMDs tax-free, effectively bypassing the ordinary income tax hit that the article warns about.
One could argue that RMDs are actually a vital mechanism to prevent tax-deferred accounts from becoming perpetual, untaxed wealth-transfer vehicles, forcing capital circulation that benefits the broader economy.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"The article explains RMD rules correctly but fails to address whether $1M is sufficient to sustain a 73-year-old for 20+ years, especially if early withdrawals coincide with market downturns."
This article is essentially a mechanics explainer dressed as news—it recycles IRS RMD tables that haven't changed materially and adds no forward-looking insight. The real story buried here: at 73, a $1M portfolio generating $37.7K in forced withdrawals (3.77% initial rate) faces serious sequence-of-returns risk if markets decline early in retirement. The article mentions inflation at 3.1% but doesn't stress-test whether $1M actually sustains a retiree for 15+ years post-withdrawal. The penalty reduction from 50% to 25% under SECURE 2.0 is presented as relief, but it's still punitive enough to matter. Most problematic: the article conflates RMD mechanics with retirement adequacy—they're not the same thing.
For middle-class retirees, $1M is genuinely substantial; forced withdrawals ensure they actually spend rather than hoard, which improves their living standard. The article's emphasis on tax planning and advisor engagement may be exactly what this demographic needs to hear.
"The strongest takeaway is that RMDs are highly tax-sensitive, and proper tax-efficient planning (Roth conversions, QCDs, asset-location) can drastically change the real-world burden versus the headline-dollar figures."
The piece correctly outlines the mechanics of RMDs (age 73 trigger, balance/divisor formula, and increasing dollar amount with age). Yet it misses that RMDs are a tax lever, not just a cash-out rule: the withdrawals are ordinary income and can push you into higher tax brackets, raise Medicare premiums, and affect Social Security taxation. Crucially, it glosses over planning options that can materially alter outcomes, such as Roth conversions (to reduce future RMDs), qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) to offset taxable income, and strategic asset location between taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth accounts. Market returns, spending pace, and portfolio balance drive real RMDs far more than a static $1M example.
If you overemphasize the tax drag, you risk ignoring that well-timed Roth conversions or QCDs can materially shrink after-tax withdrawals, potentially making the dollar RMDs less onerous than the article suggests.
"RMD-induced spikes in MAGI trigger IRMAA surcharges, creating a hidden, compounding tax burden that goes beyond simple income tax brackets."
Claude is right that the article conflates mechanics with adequacy, but both Claude and ChatGPT ignore the 'tax torpedo' effect. For retirees, the real risk isn't just the 25% penalty; it's the IRMAA surcharge. Forcing withdrawals can spike your MAGI, triggering higher Medicare Part B and D premiums. This makes the effective marginal tax rate on RMDs significantly higher than the federal income tax bracket alone suggests. The math isn't just about portfolio depletion; it's about systemic wealth erosion.
[Unavailable]
"IRMAA is a material hidden tax, but it's avoidable through pre-RMD tax planning that the article never mentions."
Gemini nails the IRMAA torpedo—Medicare premium surcharges can add 2-3% effective tax drag on RMDs that the article completely omits. But I'd push back: this assumes retirees stay in high-income brackets indefinitely. Strategic Roth conversions *before* 73 (during lower-income years post-retirement, pre-RMD) can front-load tax and flatten future MAGI. The article's real sin isn't missing IRMAA; it's treating RMDs as inevitable rather than plannable. For someone retiring at 65, five years of tax-efficient positioning materially changes the 73+ calculus.
"Policy tail risks and MAGI-linked healthcare costs must be modeled alongside RMDs to avoid a miscalibrated withdrawal glidepath."
Gemini correctly flags IRMAA as a real drag, but that’s only part of the retirement tax-healthcare spine. The bigger risk is how RMDs interact with a long horizon amid rising healthcare costs and potential policy shifts (RMD age changes, SECURE 2.0 updates). Medicare surcharges aren’t a one-time hit. A plan ignoring MAGI dynamics, sequencing risk, and policy tail risks risks a miscalibrated withdrawal glidepath.
The panel agrees that the article misses crucial aspects of RMDs, including their impact on Medicare premiums and the strategic use of QCDs and Roth conversions. They highlight the 'sequence of returns' risk and the potential for RMDs to accelerate wealth erosion.
Strategic use of Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) and Roth conversions to mitigate RMD impacts.
Sequence of returns risk and the 'tax torpedo' effect of IRMAA surcharges on Medicare premiums.