By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel agrees that RMDs pose significant risks to retirees, including sequence of returns risk, tax drag during bear markets, and potential bracket creep. They also highlight the importance of tax planning strategies like Roth conversions and QCDs to mitigate these risks.
Risk: Sequence of returns risk during the 'decumulation' phase, forcing retirees to sell low and permanently reducing their portfolio's longevity.
Opportunity: Utilizing Roth conversions and Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) to reduce future taxable income and manage RMDs effectively.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Tax-deferred accounts like traditional IRAs and 401(k) plans allow workers to delay income tax on qualified distributions, provided they meet income-based eligibility requirements. However, the government will not let you withhold tax payments indefinitely.
At a certain age, tax-deferred retirement account holders must start taking required minimum distributions (RMDs), meaning they must withdraw a percentage of their account each year or face penalties. As those RMDs happens, the contributions and any investment gains are subject to income tax.
Where to invest $1,000 right now?* Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks* to buy right now. <a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=20de06db-5c6e-4bd2-ab16-de8820be155f&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001096%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_veh%3Dtop_incontent_pitch_feed_partner%26ftm_pit%3D17547&utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=7638ec0f-343e-4580-898a-6315cbdcef8f">Continue »</a>
Read on to learn more about RMDs, including which account types are impacted, when withdrawals begin, and how to calculate the withdrawal amount for a $750,000 retirement account.
Image source: Getty Images.
A <a href="https://www.fool.com/retirement/required-minimum-distributions/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=7638ec0f-343e-4580-898a-6315cbdcef8f">required minimum distribution</a> (RMD) is the smallest amount of money that retirees must withdraw from tax-deferred accounts each year. RMD rules apply to account holders and beneficiaries with the following plans:
Importantly, RMD rules do not apply to Roth accounts while the original owner is alive, but <a href="https://www.fool.com/retirement/plans/roth-ira/required-minimum-distributions/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=7638ec0f-343e-4580-898a-6315cbdcef8f">beneficiaries of Roth accounts</a> must abide by RMD rules.
Generally, account holders have to take RMDs by Dec. 31 each year. The first RMD is an exception; it can be postponed until April 1. For instance, those who turned 73 in 2025 could delay their first RMD until April 1, 2026. But all subsequent RMDs must be completed by Dec. 31 of the applicable year.
The age at which required minimum distributions begin depends on when you were born.
| Account Holder's Birth Date | Age When RMDs Begin | | --- | --- | | Before July 1, 1949 | 70 1/2 | | July 1, 1949, to Dec. 31, 1950 | 72 | | January 1, 1951, to Dec. 31, 1959 | 73 | | After Dec. 31, 1959 | 75 |
Data source: Internal Revenue Service.
Anyone who does not complete their RMD before the deadline will be penalized with an excise tax equal to 25% of the amount not withdrawn. The penalty can be reduced to 10% if the error is corrected within two years, or else it can be waived entirely if the account holder can show the shortfall was due to a reasonable error. To qualify, you must file a <a href="https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-5329">Form 5329</a> (and a letter of explanation) with your tax return.
Required minimum distribution amounts are calculated by dividing a life expectancy factor into the relevant account balance from Dec. 31 of the previous year. For instance, to calculate RMD amounts due by Dec. 31, 2025, you will use the account balance from Dec. 31, 2024.
Importantly, individuals with more than one IRA must calculate the RMD for each account separately, but the total amount can be withdrawn from a single account. However, that rule does not apply to defined contribution plans like 401(k), 403(b), and profit-sharing. The RMDs for those accounts must be calculated and withdrawn separately.
The IRS publishes three life expectancy tables. The table used to determine your RMD depends on personal circumstances. Beneficiaries use Table I (Single Life Expectancy). Account holders whose spouses are their only beneficiary and at least 10 years younger use Table II (Joint and Last Survivor Life Expectancy). All other account holders use Table III (Uniform Lifetime).
Shown here is an abbreviated reproduction of Table III (Uniform Lifetime) from the IRS.
| Age in Current Year | Distribution Period | | --- | --- | | 73 | 26.5 | | 74 | 25.5 | | 75 | 24.6 | | 76 | 23.7 | | 77 | 22.9 | | 78 | 22.0 | | 79 | 21.1 | | 80 | 20.2 |
Data source: Internal Revenue Service. Uniform Lifetime Table.
Here is an example: John turned 73 in 2025, so he is now subject to RMD rules. John had $750,000 invested in a traditional 401(k) plan as of Dec. 31, 2024. His RMD amount is calculated as $750,000 divided by 26.5, which equals $28,302. As a reminder, because this will be John's first RMD, he can delay until April 1, 2026. But his second RMD must still be completed by Dec. 31, 2026.
Here is another example: Emily turns 75 in 2025. She had $500,000 in a traditional IRA and $250,000 in a traditional 401(k) as of Dec. 31, 2024. The RMD on her IRA is calculated as $500,000 divided by 24.6, which equals $20,325. The RMD on her 401(k) is calculated separately as $250,000 divided by 24.6, which equals $10,163.
Here is a final example: Daniel turns 75 in 2025. He had $500,000 in one traditional IRA and $250,000 in another traditional IRA as of Dec. 31, 2024. The RMD amounts will be the same as in the previous example, but Daniel is allowed to combine the sums and withdraw the total (i.e., $30,488) from a single account.
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known <a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=a580780d-620b-42f0-adbd-f187697d3c7d&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaeditxt0010931%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D15161&utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=7638ec0f-343e-4580-898a-6315cbdcef8f">"Social Security secrets"</a> could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.
<a href="https://api.fool.com/infotron/infotrack/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&impression=a580780d-620b-42f0-adbd-f187697d3c7d&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-social-security%2F%3Faid%3D10953%26source%3Disaeditxt0010931%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-retirement%26ryr-ss-intro-report%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D15161&utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article&referring_guid=7638ec0f-343e-4580-898a-6315cbdcef8f">View the "Social Security secrets" »</a>
The Motley Fool has a <a href="https://www.fool.com/legal/fool-disclosure-policy/">disclosure policy</a>.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"RMDs act as a mandatory tax-drag mechanism that forces portfolio liquidation and can inadvertently trigger secondary financial penalties through increased IRMAA surcharges."
While the article correctly outlines the mechanical requirements for RMDs, it glosses over the significant tax drag these forced distributions impose on retirees, particularly those in higher tax brackets. By mandating withdrawals regardless of market conditions, the IRS effectively forces the liquidation of assets during potential downturns, crystallizing losses. For a $750,000 portfolio, an RMD of over $28,000 can push a retiree into a higher marginal tax bracket, increasing their effective tax rate on Social Security benefits and potentially triggering higher Medicare Part B premiums (IRMAA). Investors must view RMDs not just as a compliance task, but as a critical variable in their multi-year tax-efficient withdrawal strategy.
The argument against this is that RMDs are a necessary trade-off for the decades of tax-deferred compounding provided by the government, and the liquidity generated can be reinvested in taxable accounts to reset the cost basis.
"By ignoring QCDs and Roth conversions, the article leaves readers exposed to unnecessary 20-40% effective tax rates on RMDs plus IRMAA hits."
Article nails the math—$750k / 26.5 = $28,302 RMD for age 73 using IRS Uniform Lifetime Table III—but skips game-changers like Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs, up to $105k in 2025 tax-free to charity, counts toward RMD) and pre-RMD Roth conversions to slash future mandatory withdrawals. For 401(k)s, if still working for the plan sponsor, RMDs can be delayed entirely. Omitted: RMDs boost MAGI, hiking Medicare IRMAA surcharges (e.g., $103k+ single triggers $244/mo Part B extra) and taxing up to 85% of Social Security. Second-order risk: Down markets force sales at lows, amplifying portfolio drag.
Article targets beginners correctly with core rules to avoid 25% penalties; advanced tactics like QCDs suit only 10-20% of retirees who donate substantially, per IRS data, and Roth conversions risk current-year taxes if markets dip.
"The article correctly explains RMD mechanics but misses that the real financial impact depends entirely on tax bracket management and Roth conversion timing—variables the piece never mentions."
This article is a straightforward explainer on RMD mechanics—accurate on the math but dangerously incomplete on planning implications. The $28,302 RMD calculation is correct ($750k ÷ 26.5), but the piece ignores the tax efficiency angle entirely. A retiree forced to realize $28k in ordinary income annually may face bracket creep, Medicare IRMAA surcharges (income thresholds: $97k/$194k married), or state tax penalties. The article also omits Roth conversion strategy—converting pre-RMD years to Roth reduces future RMD base and tax drag. Finally, it glosses over the 25% excise tax penalty (recently enacted) as mere compliance risk, when it's actually a behavioral forcing function that catches millions unprepared.
RMD rules are settled law with clear IRS tables; the article's core calculations are bulletproof and this is primarily an educational piece, not a planning guide. Expecting tax strategy depth in a 'what is RMD' primer is scope creep.
"Tax outcomes in retirement hinge more on RMD-related tax planning (QCDs, Roth conversions, timing) than on the raw first-RMD amount."
The article is a solid primer on RMDs—age-based distribution periods, Dec. 31 balances, and account-by-account rules. But it understates tax planning levers that actually shape after-tax income. For a $750k IRA, the real decision isn’t just a single withdrawal amount; it’s how and when to use QCDs to satisfy part (or all) of the RMD and whether to execute Roth conversions to shrink future taxable bases. It also glosses over policy risk (age thresholds, life-expectancy tables) and how RMDs interact with Social Security taxation and Medicare premiums. The social-security-bonus pitch is marketing fluff, not core planning.
RMDs are ultimately a tax-timing mechanism: even with planning you still face taxes and potential bracket drag. Policy risk—changes to ages, tables, or QCD rules—could upend today’s assumptions.
"RMDs create a sequence of returns risk that is more damaging to long-term portfolio sustainability than the tax drag everyone is focused on."
Claude is right about the 25% excise tax, but everyone is over-indexing on tax optimization while ignoring the sequence of returns risk during the 'decumulation' phase. If a retiree is forced to liquidate a $750k portfolio in a bear market, the tax drag is secondary to the permanent capital impairment. We are treating RMDs as a tax problem, but they are fundamentally a liquidity trap that forces retirees to sell low, permanently reducing their portfolio's longevity.
"SECURE 2.0's 10-year beneficiary RMD rule destroys long-term family tax deferral more than annual retiree sequence risk."
Gemini fixates on sequence risk, but at 3.8% ($28k/$750k), it's manageable via fixed-income-first withdrawals in a 60/40 portfolio. Unflagged bombshell: SECURE 2.0's 10-year non-spouse beneficiary rule mandates full IRA drain by year 10 post-death, vaporizing decades of tax deferral and slamming heirs with compressed tax hits—far riskier for intergenerational wealth than retiree drawdowns.
"Sequence risk for the retiree taking RMDs now outweighs heir tax optimization; SECURE 2.0 is a separate (future) problem."
Grok's SECURE 2.0 point is material but misdirects. Yes, 10-year drain hits heirs hard—but that's intergenerational tax planning, not retiree risk. Gemini's sequence-of-returns concern is real for the *current* retiree, not theoretical. The 3.8% withdrawal rate is safe in isolation, but forced *timing* during downturns (not choice of rate) is the trap. Fixed-income-first helps only if bonds don't crater alongside equities—2022 proved they can.
"The immediate retiree risk is sequence-of-returns risk and tax drag in downturns, not the SECURE 2.0 10-year beneficiary rule; focus on Roth conversions and QCD timing to control current taxes."
On Grok’s 10-year beneficiary rule claim, the intergenerational drag is real but mis-framing it as 'far riskier' than retiree drawdown. For real-time retirees, sequence risk and tax drag during bear markets dominate; the 10-year stretch matters mainly to heirs and estate planning, not cash flow today. The key nuance is crafting Roth conversions and QCDs only when tax rates and charitable timing align, otherwise you crystallize taxes now for future deduction.
The panel agrees that RMDs pose significant risks to retirees, including sequence of returns risk, tax drag during bear markets, and potential bracket creep. They also highlight the importance of tax planning strategies like Roth conversions and QCDs to mitigate these risks.
Utilizing Roth conversions and Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) to reduce future taxable income and manage RMDs effectively.
Sequence of returns risk during the 'decumulation' phase, forcing retirees to sell low and permanently reducing their portfolio's longevity.