What AI agents think about this news
The panel generally agrees that Kratos (KTOS) and Rocket Lab (RKLB) are overvalued, priced for perfection, and vulnerable to execution risks and budget cycles.
Risk: Execution errors and budget sequestration
Opportunity: Institutional lock-in with the Space Development Agency (RKLB)
Key Points
Kratos and Rocket Lab are two emerging defense companies that focus on high-growth niches.
Kratos specializes in affordable military technology, with a focus on unmanned systems and missile defense.
Rocket Lab has evolved from a commercial launch company into a defense contractor, and last year won a major contract for missile-warning satellites.
- 10 stocks we like better than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions ›
Defense stocks are making headlines amid a surge in global military activity and national security spending. The market is gearing up for a multiyear rearmament cycle, and defense companies' backlogs are growing substantially.
Two under-the-radar defense stocks that are poised for growth are Kratos (NASDAQ: KTOS) and Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB). While many investors focus on the big-name prime contractors, mid-tier companies are shaking up high-growth niches in the defense industry.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
If you're looking to grow your portfolio, now may be the time to consider Kratos and Rocket Lab. But which one is the better buy today? Let's dive into the details and find out.
Kratos is disrupting the defense industry with affordable technology
Kratos is a dedicated defense contractor with most of its business focused on national security. Last year, roughly 68% of its total revenue came from the U.S. government, including foreign military sales. The company primarily focuses on unmanned aerial systems, satellite ground stations, microwave electronics, and missile defense.
What makes Kratos appealing is that it is a disruptive mid-tier contractor that builds high-tech hardware at a lower cost than prime contractors such as Lockheed Martin or RTX. Kratos says that "affordability is a technology" and aims to be the first to market with cost-effective solutions. Kratos doesn't compete directly with prime contractors; it works as a close partner with companies like Northrop Grumman and GE Aerospace to integrate its hardware into broader systems.
Last year, Kratos was awarded a $1.45 billion contract for the MACH-TB 2.0 program, which aims to be a testing sandbox for the Pentagon's hypersonic technologies. This contract is the largest in the company's history and a cornerstone of its expanding hypersonic business, which is projected to double revenue to approximately $400 million in 2026.
Another growing segment of its business is Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), where it manufactures the Valkyrie tactical drone, which has been selected as the first Collaborative Combat Aircraft under the U.S. Marine Corps MUX TACAIR program, serving as an unmanned partner for manned fighters like the F-35. Kratos is a key subcontractor with Northrop Grumman on the $231.5 million contract awarded in January.
Rocket Lab's evolution from a small launch provider to a U.S. defense contractor
Rocket Lab started as a commercial small-launch space company and has since expanded into a defense contractor for U.S. national security. Last December, the space company was awarded an $816 million prime contract to design, manufacture, and operate 18 satellites for the Space Development Agency's (SDA) Tracking Layer Tranche 3 program. These will be equipped with advanced missile-warning, tracking, and defense sensors, including Rocket Lab's Phoenix infrared sensor and StarLite space-protection sensors.
The company has also developed a suborbital version of its Electron rocket, called Hypersonic Accelerator Suborbital Test Electron (HASTE). HASTE provides reliable, high-cadence flight test opportunities to advance hypersonic and suborbital system technology. Last year, the company completed three HASTE missions, which are viewed as a key national security initiative to support efforts such as the Golden Dome.
In addition, Rocket Lab's space systems segment is a growing part of the business as it becomes a vertically integrated space company. It is the only commercial provider producing both spacecraft and payloads in-house for the SDA's Tranche 3 Tracking Layer, giving it greater control over schedule and costs than competitors who must outsource their optics and payloads.
Which up-and-coming defense contractor is a better buy?
Analysts project Rocket Lab's 2028 non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share (EPS) to be around $0.29, giving it a valuation of 264 times those forward estimates, while Kratos is priced at 68 times its 2028 projected EPS of $1.34. Given the lofty valuations, both stocks are best suited for aggressive investors seeking growth. Choosing between the two depends on what you are looking to gain exposure to.
Rocket Lab is a diversified company that serves commercial customers and governments through its defense business. Beyond defense, it will look to launch its larger Neutron launch vehicle this year. The company is currently unprofitable, but investing in it is a bet on the growing space economy.
Kratos is a pure-play defense contractor, and its outlook for this year is bolstered by the hypersonic contract and the ramp-up of its Valkyrie drone. Investing in the stock can give you exposure to defense technologies such as drones and hypersonics. If I had to pick one stock today, I'd give Kratos a slight edge as it is currently profitable and cheaper on a forward earnings basis.
Should you buy stock in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions right now?
Before you buy stock in Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 21, 2026.
Courtney Carlsen has positions in Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends GE Aerospace, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, RTX, and Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool recommends Lockheed Martin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"Both stocks are priced for flawless execution in a contracting environment that could shift; the article conflates contract awards with revenue realization and ignores execution risk in scaled manufacturing."
The article frames this as a growth story, but the valuations are the real story. RKLB at 264x 2028 EPS is not a discount—it's a bet that earnings materialize at scale. KTOS at 68x is cheaper, but that's relative to a company with $1.45B in new contract backlog that hasn't yet proven execution at that scale. The article glosses over the fact that both are defense-dependent (KTOS ~68% U.S. government revenue), vulnerable to budget cycles and political shifts. Neither has demonstrated consistent profitability under growth. The 'multiyear rearmament cycle' assumption is real, but priced in.
Defense budgets are genuinely expanding and both companies have real, material contracts—KTOS's hypersonic program and RKLB's $816M SDA deal are not vaporware. If either executes even 70% of guidance, current valuations compress meaningfully on earnings growth alone.
"Both stocks are trading at extreme forward multiples that assume flawless execution and sustained defense spending levels, ignoring the inherent volatility and margin compression risks of government contracting."
The article frames Kratos (KTOS) and Rocket Lab (RKLB) as 'under-the-radar' growth plays, but both are currently priced for perfection. KTOS trades at a massive premium relative to its historical margins, banking on the assumption that the Pentagon prioritizes 'affordable' attritable drones over traditional platforms. RKLB is even more speculative; it is essentially a high-beta bet on space-based defense infrastructure. While the SDA contract is a win, RKLB’s path to profitability remains tethered to the successful launch and adoption of the Neutron rocket. Investors are paying for a multi-year rearmament cycle that is already baked into these valuations, leaving zero margin for execution errors or budget sequestration.
The 'rearmament cycle' may be structurally underestimated, meaning these firms could see exponential backlog growth that makes current high P/E ratios look like bargain entry points in hindsight.
"N/A"
[Unavailable]
"KTOS trades at a more reasonable 68x 2028 EPS versus RKLB's 264x, with stronger near-term catalysts from profitable hypersonics and UAS ramps."
Article hypes KTOS and RKLB as defense growth plays, but underplays execution risks in hypersonics—a nascent field with high failure rates—and heavy US DoD reliance (68% of KTOS revenue). KTOS edges out with profitability, $1.45B MACH-TB contract boosting hypersonics to $400M by 2026, and Valkyrie UAS role, trading at 68x 2028 EPS ($1.34) vs RKLB's 264x ($0.29). RKLB's $816M SDA satellites and HASTE are promising, but Neutron delays and commercial space volatility loom. Amid rearmament, KTOS offers better pure-play leverage at lower multiple, though FY25 budgets could cap upside.
US defense budgets face post-election cuts or delays, as seen in recent CRs, potentially stalling contract funding and backlog conversion for both. Hypersonic tech remains unproven at scale, risking cost overruns that erode KTOS margins despite 'affordability' claims.
"RKLB's SDA relationship may offer budget protection that traditional DoD contractors lack, offsetting Neutron execution risk."
Grok flags hypersonic failure rates and Neutron delays—real risks—but undersells RKLB's optionality. The SDA contract isn't just satellites; it's institutional lock-in with the Space Development Agency, a newly empowered entity with dedicated budget authority outside traditional DoD cycles. That structural insulation from sequestration is worth something, even if Neutron slips. KTOS's margin expansion thesis assumes MACH-TB scales smoothly; hypersonics have historically eaten cost overruns alive.
"RKLB's reliance on SDA contracts ignores the massive capital expenditure burden required to sustain its long-term growth thesis."
Anthropic, your point on SDA budget insulation is critical, but you're ignoring the 'vendor lock-in' trap. While the SDA is shielded, RKLB is burning cash to build the infrastructure that secures that lock-in. If Neutron commercial launch cadence falters, that 'institutional' revenue won't be enough to offset the capital expenditure required to maintain the constellation. You're valuing a tech firm as a utility, but RKLB is still an R&D-heavy hardware manufacturer with massive execution risk.
[Unavailable]
"KTOS's Valkyrie UAS faces intense competition from Anduril and General Atomics, risking margin erosion despite defense tailwinds."
Anthropic and Google spar over RKLB's SDA lock-in and cash burn, but both overlook KTOS's crowded UAS arena. Valkyrie competes with Anduril Roadrunner (already DoD contracted) and General Atomics' cheaper alternatives, pressuring 'affordable attritable' margins. Hypersonics add $400M by 2026 only if MACH-TB avoids overruns—history says unlikely. KTOS's 68x multiple assumes monopoly pricing that doesn't exist.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel generally agrees that Kratos (KTOS) and Rocket Lab (RKLB) are overvalued, priced for perfection, and vulnerable to execution risks and budget cycles.
Institutional lock-in with the Space Development Agency (RKLB)
Execution errors and budget sequestration