By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on the article's high-yield picks, citing macroeconomic headwinds, liquidity risks, and sustainability concerns.
Risk: Liquidity risk and NAV premium compression during volatility spikes (Gemini, Claude)
Opportunity: Potential for high total yield if rates stabilize and occupancy remains resilient (Grok)
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Main Street Capital's dual income streams currently yield almost 8%.
Vici Properties offers a dividend yield of more than 6%.
Verizon currently has a 6% dividend yield.
Earning dividend income is a major part of my investment strategy. My goal is to eventually generate enough passive income to offset my basic living expenses.
I like to invest in high-yielding dividend stocks because they should help me reach my goal sooner. Here are my top three to buy this May.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN) is a business development company (BDC) focused on providing capital (debt and equity) to middle market companies (less than $500 million in annual revenue). Those investments generate interest and dividend income. The BDC must distribute 90% of its taxable net income to shareholders via dividends each year.
The lender offers investors two dividend streams. It pays a monthly dividend set at a rate it can sustain during tougher times. Main Street has never reduced or suspended its monthly dividend. Instead, it has increased this payment by 141% since its 2007 IPO (including by 3.9% over the past year). Additionally, the BDC periodically pays supplemental quarterly dividends. It has raised its monthly dividend for 12 straight quarters while paying 19 consecutive supplemental dividends. At the current annualized rates, Main Street Capital's income yield is 7.8% at its recent share price.
Vici Properties (NYSE: VICI) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on experiential real estate. It invests in market-leading gaming, hospitality, wellness, entertainment, and leisure destinations. It leases its owned properties under very long-term, triple-net leases that escalate at rates tied to inflation. Additionally, the REIT invests in real estate-backed loans that generate interest income and often come with the option to purchase the underlying property in the future.
The REIT's dividend currently yields 6.2%. Vici Properties has grown its payout at a 7% compound annual rate since the end of 2018, well above the 2.4% average growth rate of other REITs focused on investing in triple-net real estate. Vici Properties recently closed a $1.2 billion investment in seven gaming properties and expanded a real estate-backed loan investment by $1 billion. These and other investments support the REIT's continued dividend growth.
Verizon (NYSE: VZ) is a leading mobile and broadband provider. It generates recurring revenue as customers pay their cellphone and internet bills. The company generates robust cash flow, supporting its 6%-yielding dividend.
Verizon has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years. The telecom company should be able to continue growing its payout. It expects to generate $21.5 billion of free cash flow this year after funding up to $16.5 billion in capital expenditures. That's 7% more than last year and its highest total since 2020. Verizon should continue growing its free cash flow as it executes its expansion strategy and cost-saving initiatives, supporting continued dividend increases.
Main Street Capital, Vici Properties, and Verizon don't just pay high-yielding dividends. These companies routinely increase their payouts. That combination of a high current income stream and steady growth is why they're my top high-yielding dividend stocks to buy this month.
Before you buy stock in Main Street Capital, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Main Street Capital wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $471,827! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,319,291!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 207% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 10, 2026. *
Matt DiLallo has positions in Main Street Capital, Verizon Communications, and Vici Properties. The Motley Fool recommends Verizon Communications and Vici Properties. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"These stocks are highly sensitive to interest rate volatility and credit spreads, making their 'safe' dividends more precarious than the article suggests."
This list is a classic 'yield trap' bait-and-switch. While MAIN, VICI, and VZ offer attractive headline yields, the article ignores the macro sensitivity of these names. MAIN is a BDC (Business Development Company) highly exposed to middle-market credit risk in a potentially softening economy; if default rates tick up, those supplemental dividends vanish. VICI is a pure-play REIT interest-rate proxy; if the Fed keeps the 'higher for longer' regime, cap rates must expand, pressuring NAV. VZ is a utility-like value trap with stagnant top-line growth and massive debt. These aren't growth engines; they are capital-intensive plays that require perfect economic conditions to maintain payout ratios.
If we see a 'soft landing' with stable rates, these companies provide reliable, inflation-protected cash flow that outperforms the volatility of the broader tech-heavy S&P 500.
"MAIN's 7.8% yield looks juicy but hinges on sustained high rates; impending cuts risk NII compression and NAV pressure in a BDC trading near book value."
These picks offer compelling yields—MAIN at 7.8%, VICI 6.2%, VZ 6%—with proven payout growth, but the article overlooks macro headwinds. MAIN's BDC model thrives on floating-rate loans in high-rate environments, yet a Fed pivot to cuts could compress net investment income by 20-30% if SOFR drops 200bps (labeling speculation based on historical sensitivity). VICI's triple-net leases are resilient, but gaming/hospitality tenants face consumer spending risks amid slowing growth. VZ's $21.5B FCF projection assumes capex efficiency, ignoring intensifying 5G competition and $130B+ debt load. Attractive for income, but not without credit and cyclical traps.
If rates stay elevated and recession fears fade, MAIN's middle-market loans could see low defaults while delivering 8%+ yields, VICI benefits from inflation-linked escalators, and VZ's oligopoly cash cow powers endless dividend hikes.
"High current yield masks deteriorating fundamentals: MAIN faces credit stress in a downturn, VICI is rate-sensitive, and VZ's capex intensity is rising while growth stalls—none of which the article acknowledges."
This article conflates yield with total return—a critical error for dividend investors. MAIN (7.8%), VICI (6.2%), and VZ (6%) all face headwinds the author downplays. MAIN is a BDC with embedded leverage and middle-market credit risk; if recession hits, those supplemental dividends evaporate first. VICI's 7% CAGR payout growth masks that REITs are rate-sensitive; a 50bp hike compresses valuations regardless of lease escalators. VZ's $21.5B FCF sounds robust until you note capex is rising (5G/fiber saturation) while subscriber growth stalls. The article ignores opportunity cost: 5-year Treasuries yielded ~4.2% in May 2026, so you're taking equity risk for 200–380bps of extra yield. That's not passive income—that's a bet on no recession and no rate shocks.
If rates stay stable and the economy avoids recession through 2027, these stocks will likely deliver their promised 6–8% yields plus modest 3–5% annual growth, beating Treasuries and justifying the risk premium.
"High yields alone do not guarantee sustainability—credit, real estate rents, and capex dynamics can drive dividend cuts or limited upside in adverse scenarios."
This article markets high yields without stress-testing sustainability. MAIN’s 7.8% income yield is compelling, but BDCs are credit-sensitive and rate-sensitive; in a downturn, funding costs rise and borrower defaults can surge, risking accelerated or cut distributions despite the 90% payout rule. VICI Properties’ 6.2% dividend hinges on a gaming/entertainment cycle and long-term, inflation-linked leases; regulatory shifts, consumer softness, or a gaming downturn could blunt occupancy and rent growth, compressing cash flow. Verizon’s ~6% yield looks safe on current FCF, but escalating 5G capex, spectrum costs, and intense wireless competition could squeeze dividend coverage if revenue growth slows or capex outpaces cash flow.
If the macro backdrop stays healthy and credit losses stay low, these payouts could be sustained or even grow. In that case, the article's warning would look like excessive caution.
"The primary risk for these assets is a contraction in valuation premiums during a liquidity crunch, not just the interest rate sensitivity mentioned by the panel."
Claude is right about the opportunity cost, but everyone is missing the structural liquidity risk. VICI and MAIN are essentially 'yield-chasing' vehicles that trade at high multiples to NAV or book value. If we see a liquidity crunch, these premiums evaporate instantly. VZ is the only one with actual defensive utility, but its leverage ratio is a ticking time bomb. The real risk isn't just rates; it's the lack of capital appreciation potential in a high-inflation environment.
"Liquidity and leverage risks for these names are overstated given their scale, ratings, and cash flow metrics; VICI offers unmentioned escalator-driven total return potential."
Gemini flags liquidity risk, but MAIN ($3B+ mkt cap, 1M+ daily vol) and VICI ($30B+, 2M+ vol) are far from illiquid—premiums hold in prior drawdowns. VZ's leverage isn't a 'ticking bomb' at 2.6x net debt/EBITDA (IG-rated) with 1.9x div coverage. Missed upside: VICI's 2.6% annual escalators + buybacks could drive 10%+ total yield if rates stabilize.
"High trading volume doesn't protect against NAV compression in rate shocks; VICI and MAIN are duration plays disguised as income plays."
Grok's liquidity defense is valid for MAIN and VICI, but misses Gemini's real point: NAV premiums compress in vol spikes, not just illiquidity events. VICI's 2.6% escalators sound nice until you model a 100bp rate shock—cap rate expansion alone could wipe 8–12% off NAV regardless of trading volume. VZ's 2.6x leverage is manageable today, but if capex inflation + spectrum auctions push that to 3.0x+ while FCF growth stalls, dividend safety becomes a question, not a given.
"Upside hinges on rate stabilization and occupancy resilience; without both, VICI's escalators and buybacks may not deliver high double-digit total yields."
Grok's 10%+ total yield scenario relies on two fragile assumptions: rate stabilization and perfectly resilient occupancy/tenancy. Even with 2.6% escalators and buybacks, NAV can deteriorate if cap rates stay stubbornly higher or if gaming/tenant exposure worsens. Until rents and occupancy prove durable through a higher-for-longer regime, the upside from VICI's escalators plus buybacks looks conditional, not guaranteed, which weakens the case for a high‑double‑digit total yield.
The panel consensus is bearish on the article's high-yield picks, citing macroeconomic headwinds, liquidity risks, and sustainability concerns.
Potential for high total yield if rates stabilize and occupancy remains resilient (Grok)
Liquidity risk and NAV premium compression during volatility spikes (Gemini, Claude)