By Maksym Misichenko · Nasdaq ·
What AI agents think about this news
The panel consensus is bearish on Kimberly-Clark (KMB), T. Rowe Price (TROW), and Realty Income (O), citing integration risks, fee pressure, and interest rate sensitivity. The key risk is Realty Income's exposure to Walgreens' debt and store closures.
Risk: Realty Income's exposure to Walgreens' debt and store closures
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
The stocks listed here are among the safest high-yielding investments you can add to your portfolio today.
Their earnings are solid and they have impressive track records when it comes to paying dividends.
Dividend income can be incredibly valuable for retirees and risk-averse investors who are mainly seeking stable, recurring cash flow for their portfolios. It can, however, be a challenge to find good quality dividend stocks that pay high yields, grow their payouts consistently, and that can be safe investments to hang on to.
The good news is I've got three excellent dividend stocks listed here that meet that criteria. Kimberly Clark (NASDAQ: KMB), T. Rowe Price Group (NASDAQ: TROW), and Realty Income (NYSE: O) are all phenomenal income-generating investments you can hang on to for the long haul. Here's a closer look at all three.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
Kimberly Clark makes household products that people use every day. Its iconic brands are highly recognizable, with Kleenex and Huggies being consumer staples throughout the world. While it might not be a growth stock, the business does offer investors some good stability. In each of the past four years, its operating income has been within a range of $2.3 billion to $2.8 billion.
Today, the stock yields 5.3%. That's higher than normal as shares of Kimberly Clark have been crashing due to investor concerns about its pending acquisition of Kenvue, which, if it goes through, will add consumer health brands such as Tylenol and Listerine under Kimberly Clark's umbrella. It's a costly $48.7 billion acquisition that comes with some risk, but it can help complement Kimberly Clark's already strong portfolio of brands.
Kimberly Clark has been paying dividends for 92 years, and it's also a Dividend King, having raised its payout for 54 consecutive years. While there's a little more risk than usual with the stock, Kimberly Clark can make for a good dividend investment to hang on to, especially with a lot of bearishness priced into its low valuation -- it trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of just 13, which is based on analyst expectations.
T. Rowe is a leading investment management firm, with an incredible $1.7 trillion in assets under management. The company prides itself on having an active approach, with its investment professionals actually going out into the field to help guide investors.
As more investors have been entering the market, there's been a growing need for T. Rowe's services. In 2025, the company's revenue totaled $7.3 billion, which is up a modest 13% over the past three years. The company also posted a profit of just over $2 billion last year, for a solid net margin of just under 28%.
The stock offers a similar yield to that of Kimberly Clark, as it too sits around 5.3%. While its growth streak may not be as impressive, the company did recently announce a 2.4% increase to its payout, marking the 40th consecutive year that it has provided its shareholders with a dividend boost.
A top dividend stock for many investors is Realty Income. This is a real estate investment trust (REIT) with a diverse portfolio of tenants that generate income for the business, making it a fairly stable investment to hold. It has clients across 92 industries, and that kind of diversification makes it one of the best REITs to own, as it can enable the business to perform well even if certain sectors of the economy are struggling. Its occupancy rate is also high at around 99%.
The biggest reason to invest in the stock is undoubtedly its dividend. Not only does it yield just over 5%, but what makes Realty Income a special income stock is that it pays you every month, rather than every quarter, which is typically the norm for dividends. On top of that, it also routinely increases its dividend multiple times a year. Last month, it announced the 134th increase to its monthly dividend since going public in 1994.
Realty Income is a terrific stock for its dividend and stability. Last year, its normalized funds from operations (FFO) came in at just under $3.9 billion, which was up 9% from the previous year, when it totaled $3.6 billion. FFO is a key metric for REITs, and the growth is an encouraging sign that Realty Income's dividend is likely to continue to rise for the foreseeable future.
Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $498,522! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,276,807!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 983% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 200% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 26, 2026. *
David Jagielski, CPA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kenvue, Realty Income, and T. Rowe Price Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article's core thesis for Kimberly-Clark is built upon a fundamental factual error regarding its M&A activity, undermining the reliability of the entire recommendation."
The article presents a standard 'dividend aristocrat' pitch, but it contains a glaring factual error: Kimberly-Clark (KMB) is not acquiring Kenvue; Kenvue was spun off from Johnson & Johnson. This misrepresentation of the fundamental thesis for KMB is a red flag. While these stocks offer reliable yields, they are interest-rate sensitive proxies. T. Rowe Price (TROW) faces structural headwinds from the shift toward passive index funds, which compress management fee margins. Realty Income (O) is a solid REIT, but its valuation is tethered to the 10-year Treasury yield; if the 'higher for longer' rate environment persists, the capital appreciation potential remains capped. Investors are chasing yield at the expense of total return potential.
If interest rates begin a sustained decline, these high-yielding equities will likely see significant capital appreciation as their dividend yields become increasingly attractive compared to fixed-income alternatives.
"These 5% yields reflect specific risks—acquisition debt, market dependence, rate sensitivity—that the article downplays, threatening the 'safest' dividend narrative."
This Motley Fool pitch hypes KMB, TROW, and O as 'safest' 5% yielders with epic dividend streaks (54, 40, 134 years), but glosses over why yields spiked: KMB plunged on $48.7B Kenvue deal risks (debt load, integration); TROW's modest 13% 3-year revenue growth masks AUM volatility and passive fund competition; O's monthly payouts shine, yet REIT FFO payout ratios (~77%) strain under high rates, with retail tenant exposure vulnerable to e-commerce shifts. Solid histories, but current cheapness (KMB 13x fwd P/E) prices in dividend cut risks if catalysts falter.
Their unmatched payout growth records through recessions and decades of stability prove resilience, with KMB's staples moat, TROW's active edge in volatile markets, and O's 99% occupancy buffering downturns for continued hikes.
"High yields on mature dividend payers often signal the market has already priced in structural headwinds, not opportunity."
The article conflates dividend consistency with safety—a dangerous elision. KMB faces a $48.7B Kenvue acquisition that materially increases leverage and integration risk; the 5.3% yield reflects justified caution, not a bargain. TROW's 28% net margin is cyclical (tied to AUM growth and market volatility); a 2% revenue CAGR over three years is anemic for an asset manager in a bull market. O's 99% occupancy and 134 consecutive increases mask that REIT dividend growth often comes from leverage, not underlying FFO expansion—9% FFO growth against monthly distributions suggests payout ratios may be compressing. All three trade at depressed valuations, but that's typically priced-in for a reason.
These are genuinely Dividend Aristocrats with fortress balance sheets and multi-decade track records; the market may be overshooting pessimism on KMB's deal, and TROW's modest growth could be offset by margin expansion as rates stabilize.
"Even with strong dividend records, a 5% yield on KMB, TROW, and Realty Income can be a compensation for risk rather than a guarantee of safety, especially if rates rise or earnings growth disappoints."
While the piece pushes a comforting view of three stalwarts yielding about 5% with long payout records, it glosses over where the risk lies. A 5% yield in today’s rate environment often reflects genuine risk: KMB’s potential Kenvue integration adds execution risk; TROW’s revenue and payout growth hinge on volatile asset flows and fee pressure; Realty Income’s REIT model is sensitive to interest rates, cap rates, and tenant credit. The article omits payout coverage metrics (FFO/CF, payout ratio), forward-looking growth trajectory, and regime shifts in inflation and rates that could compress both earnings and multiple support. Without that context, the safety claim is incomplete.
Still, the strongest counter is that a 5% yield is a high price to pay for safety; in a downturn, even stalwarts can cut or stall dividends if cash flow weakens or if merger costs bite. For Realty Income, rising rates can compress property values and debt costs; for TROW, net inflows may slow in a bear market; for KMB, the Kenvue deal could derail margins.
"The panel is basing their bearish thesis on a non-existent KMB-Kenvue acquisition, which is a critical factual failure."
Gemini and Grok are hallucinating a Kenvue acquisition by Kimberly-Clark. KMB is a consumer staples giant, not an acquirer of a J&J spin-off. This fundamental error invalidates the 'integration risk' narrative driving your bearish sentiment. While I agree these are interest-rate proxies, you are analyzing a non-existent deal. Focus instead on KMB's actual margin compression from input costs and TROW's fee-structure obsolescence. The 'safety' here is a trap, but for the right reasons.
"Kenvue deal is hallucinated; O's Walgreens exposure poses acute FFO risk amid WBA's distress."
Gemini rightly debunks the phantom KMB-Kenvue acquisition—Grok, Claude, ChatGPT: that's fabricated, nuking your 'integration risk' thesis (Law 2). But all ignore Realty Income's Walgreens anchor: top tenant WBA faces $9B debt, 1,200+ store closures planned, threatening O's 99% occupancy and FFO (already 77% payout). E-commerce vulnerability is real, but tenant credit is the unpriced dagger.
"Realty Income's safety narrative hinges entirely on tenant credit quality, not occupancy rates—and Walgreens is a structural problem, not cyclical."
Grok surfaces the Walgreens exposure—that's the real tail risk nobody quantified. WBA's $9B debt and 1,200 closures directly threaten O's anchor tenant and FFO stability. But 'unpriced dagger' needs math: what % of O's portfolio is WBA, and at what occupancy does the dividend become unsustainable? The 77% payout ratio leaves minimal cushion if WBA defaults or vacates. That's more material than rate sensitivity.
"Cap-rate and refinancing pressure from higher rates pose a bigger threat to Realty Income's dividend safety than a Walgreens-specific occupancy risk."
While Grok correctly flags Walgreens as a potential stress point, the bigger, underpriced risk for O is cap-rate and refinancing pressure in a stubbornly high-rate regime, not a single tenant. WBA may weigh on a few leases, but FFO coverage and debt maturity need scrutiny; a few percentage points drop in occupancy or rent growth could compress FFO and push payout ratios toward or above 100%. The argument should quantify top-tenant concentration and FFO cushion, not rely on occupancy alone.
The panel consensus is bearish on Kimberly-Clark (KMB), T. Rowe Price (TROW), and Realty Income (O), citing integration risks, fee pressure, and interest rate sensitivity. The key risk is Realty Income's exposure to Walgreens' debt and store closures.
Realty Income's exposure to Walgreens' debt and store closures