The panel is largely bearish on the current inflation outlook and the potential for a Fed rate hike in September, with most participants arguing that the recent core CPI increase is driven by transitory factors and may not warrant a hike. They express concerns about the Fed potentially overtightening and risking a recession.
Risk: Overtightening into a cooling labor market and negative real wage growth, potentially leading to a recession.
Opportunity: A data-dependent Fed hold or shallow cut in 2025 if wages cool, which could crater rate expectations and support equity valuations.
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Rate-Hike Odds Soar Despite Lowest Core Consumer Price Inflation Since 2021
Following fuel-driven jump in Producer Prices, consensus was for a concomitant jump MoM in Consumer prices this morning, after last month's decline as energy prices have rebounded (though we warned that amid all the interventionist-y chatter, nothing would surprise us less than 'cool' print to offset the PPI …
Read more
Rate-Hike Odds Soar Despite Lowest Core Consumer Price Inflation Since 2021
Following fuel-driven jump in Producer Prices, consensus was for a concomitant jump MoM in Consumer prices this morning, after last month's decline as energy prices have rebounded (though we warned that amid all the interventionist-y chatter, nothing would surprise us less than 'cool' print to offset the PPI scare).
And analysts were right with headline CPI rising 0.4% MoM (exactly as expected) - biggest MoM since May - but prices rose 3.5% YoY (in line with expectations and flat to the prir month)...
Core Services accelerated...
...BUT Fuel prices dominated the rise in headline CPI...
Headline CPI rose 0.4% MoM in August, after rising 0.1% in July. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 3.4%.
The index for energy increased 2.1 percent over the month: The index for gasoline rose 3.9% in August, accounting for over one third of the monthly all items increase.
The shelter index rose 0.3 percent in August after rising 0.1 percent in July.
The index for food increased 0.1 percent over the month, as the index for food away from home increased 0.3 percent.
Just like we saw yesterday with PPI, the rebound in crude (and refined product) prices snapped CPI's Energy component notably higher...
Energy helping on a 6m annualized basis but hurting on a 3m annualized basis...
Core CPI rose 0.3% (0.29% rounded up) MoM (hotter than the 0.2% exp) but on a YoY basis it decline from 2.5% to 2.4% - the lowest since March 2021...
Core CPI rose 0.3% after increasing 0.2% in July. Core CPI rose 2.4% over the year, following a 2.5% increase over the 12 months ending July.
Indexes that increased over the month include communication, lodging away from home, airline fares, education, and used cars and trucks.
Conversely, the index for medical care and the index for motor vehicle insurance were among the major indexes that decreased in August.
MoM Core CPI (0.3%) Details
The shelter index increased 0.3% over the month after rising 0.1% in July.
The index for owners’ equivalent rent rose 0.2% in August as did the index for rent.
The lodging away from home index rose 2.4% in August after falling 2.8 percent the previous month.
The index for communication increased 2.3% over the month after rising 0.6% in July.
The airline fares index rose 2.7% in August, and the education index increased 0.8%.
The index for used cars and trucks increased 0.4% in August, and the index for new vehicles rose 0.3%
The personal care index and the household furnishings and operations index also increased over the month.
The medical care index decreased 0.2 percent in August after rising 0.4 percent in July.
The index for dental services fell 0.6 percent over the month.
The hospital services index, physicians’ services index, and prescription drugs index were all unchanged in August.
The motor vehicle insurance index declined 0.8 percent in August after falling 0.3 percent in July.
The index for apparel was unchanged in August as was the index for recreation.
YoY Core CPI (2.4%) Details
The shelter index increased 3.0 percent over the last year.
Other indexes with notable increases over the last year include airline fares (+23.4 percent), recreation (+2.7 percent), medical care (+1.6 percent), and personal care (+3.8 percent).
Shelter dropped...
Shelter Inflation rose 0.26% MoM, and up 2.75% YoY, down from 2.86% YoY in July and the lowest since March
Rent inflation rose 0.23% MoM, same as July, and up 3.04% YoY, down from 3.18% in July and the lowest since March
The much-watched SuperCore CPI (Services ex-shelter) rose notably on a YoY basis...
...with a big spike in Education & Comms costs...
Driven by a record jump in Telephone Services...
Which was all Wireless Telephone price hikes...
Here's JPMorgan with an explainer:
Education and communication goods: This category posted a near-record 1.3% rise in July, led by computer prices, as Apple repriced its Mac and iPad products.
Memory prices should continue to put upward pressure on computers and phones, which sometimes takes the form of new features being combined with price increases.
One more thing...
Bloomberg's Simon White notes that the fastest-changing input in the CPI report betrays signs that AI spending is leaking into consumer prices via the information and information processing sector.
The chart below shows the change in each CPI component’s contribution (based on its weight in the basket) to the year-on-year headline number between July and August.
The information processing sector is contributing only 0.03 percentage points to the headline rate of 3.4% at the moment, but this has risen faster than any other sector.
It includes IT hardware, where prices are starting to rise for semiconductor and memory chips, as data centers are massively fueling demand.
Apple recently announced a rise in the price of its iPhone.
If the impact from data-center spend continues, then it’s clearly an upside risk for CPI, but it should be borne in mind along with leading indicators for inflation, which are rolling over and anticipate a more subdued backdrop for price pressures over the next few months.
As an aside, real average hourly earnings growth was negative for the 5th month in a row (is it any wonder consumer confidence is low)...
On the bright-side, we are decoupling from the 19070s CPI analog...
Understandably, a lower CPI print is better for markets, and JPM's market scenario analysis affirms that:
Core MoM prints above 0.30%. SPX declines 1.5% – 2.5%; Odds 10.0%
Core MoM prints between 0.25% – 0.30%. SPX declines 25bp – 1%, Odds 25.0%
Core MoM prints between 0.20% – 0.25%. SPX gains 50bp – 1.25%, Odds 30.0%
Core MoM prints between 0.15% – 0.20%. SPX gains 1% – 1.5%, Odds 25.0%
Core MoM prints below 0.15%. SPX gains 1.5% – 2%, Odds 10.0%
For now, rate-hike odds soared to over 90%, almost certain pricing for a 25bps move higher by Warsh and his pals next week...
Rate-change expectations for 2026 has swung wildly this year from over 60bps of cuts in Feb to now 47bps of hikes (the highest of the cycle)...
Wall Street is now convinced Warsh is cornered...
Top Goldman short-term macro trader, Brian Bingham, noted that:
“The Fed is now in the most paradoxical of all positions, beholden to a single data print and potentially reactive to the rounding on the ECO screen…
Warsh told the market in his first press conference that he didn’t want to focus on the number to the right of the decimal point, but now it’s the number to the right of that one that will be the determinant. Waller’s speech on Thursday was surprisingly and overtly dovish, confirming our view that the Board skews heavily if not unanimously dovish relative to the regional presidents, but offered little new information beyond implicitly confirming a 30bp core CPI will merit a hike.
The market appears to be penciling the over/under at 25, but we struggle to see a meaningful rally on an in-line 20bp core print following this week’s jobs report; in a world where the meeting goes in pricing greater than 50% chance of a hike, the risk of the bond market interpreting a hold as a policy error seem far greater than the harm of hiking into above-target inflation.”
UBS FX team noted a somewhat muted reaction in currencies (dollar spiked then slipped lower)...
Warsh painted himself in a corner here. Well, we've gotten the hard language tough guy speech at Jackson Hole.
His remarks were prepared and his messaging was intentional.
Now, we've gotten the data - labor market print more robust, inflation still supported.
September FOMC pricing goes to just under 23bp immediately, so the market is pretty much fully expecting a hike to come.
At this point, it would be a massive blow to credibility if they fumble the football on following through with the adjustment, but the market seems to have been correct to lean into this data with a long USD gamma bias.
Interestingly, the yield curve is flattening rapidly (Fed credibility at the long-end? locked in hike will slow growth?)...
So while the world and his pet rabbit was watching for 0.2% or 0.3% - knowing energy would be a driver - it turns out it was cellphone carriers hiking prices that had forced Warsh into a corner.
Bottom line: surging cell phone prices (thanks to memory) were the deciding factor between the Core CPI printing 0.2% and 0.3%. https://t.co/KehMJOCgUj
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 11, 2026
The jawboning is over... it's shit or get off the pot time for Kevin (every new Fed head is tested early on by the markets).
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/11/2026 - 09:30
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“The market is overpricing a September hike; a data-dependent Fed is more likely to pause than hike given mixed signals and risk of a softening inflation path.”
While the headline story is hawkish, the underlying inflation signal is nuanced. Core CPI’s 0.3% MoM rise is driven by volatile components (education, communications, used cars) and shelter rents that still show disinflation on a YoY basis; energy rebound explains much of the headline. The “supercore” spike appears concentrated in services ex-shelter and may be transitory as AI-related pricing passes through; the AI/data-center angle is speculative and unlikely to sustain a broad price uplift. The Fed has signaled data-dependence, not a pre-commitment to hikes. A softer trajectory in wages or services inflation could keep September on hold, while a hike would require an unusually persistent breakout.
Against this stance: if wage growth accelerates or shelter rents surprise to the upside, the Fed may still hike; data-dependence can become data-surprise dependence, and one sticky print could validate a September move.
“The Fed is misinterpreting transitory supply-chain-driven price spikes in the tech sector as systemic inflation, setting the stage for a policy-induced recession.”
The market is hyper-fixating on a 0.1% rounding error in Core CPI, effectively forcing a Fed hike that the underlying data doesn't justify. While headline inflation is sensitive to energy, the structural narrative here is a 'policy error' in the making. We are seeing a classic supply-side cost-push scenario—specifically in IT hardware and wireless services—being treated as demand-pull inflation. If the Fed hikes into a cooling labor market and negative real wage growth, they risk overtightening into a recession. The 2026 rate hike pricing reflects a market spooked by Fed credibility, not an economy overheating. I expect the yield curve to invert further, signaling that the market sees this hike as a terminal mistake.
If the Fed fails to hike despite the 'hot' 0.3% core print, they risk unanchoring inflation expectations entirely, which would force a much more aggressive and damaging tightening cycle later.
“The 25bp hike is priced in, but the real risk isn't whether it happens—it's whether a hold (or a hike with dovish guidance) triggers a credibility crisis or a rational recalibration of terminal-rate expectations.”
The article conflates a data-dependent Fed chair with a predetermined outcome. Core CPI at 0.29% MoM rounds to 0.3%—yes, hotter than 0.2% consensus—but it's still consistent with disinflation (2.4% YoY, lowest since March 2021). The real story buried here: energy and wireless telecom drove the miss, not broad-based demand. Shelter decelerated YoY. Real wages remain negative. A 25bp hike is now 90%+ priced, but the article assumes Warsh *must* hike to preserve credibility. That's a market narrative, not Fed logic. If the Board is 'unanimously dovish' per Waller, a hold remains plausible—and would crater rate expectations, not equity valuations, if communicated as data-dependent rather than dovish.
The article is right: Warsh's Jackson Hole hawkishness created a credibility trap. A hold after signaling toughness *and* a 0.3% core print risks a dollar collapse and long-end yields spiking if interpreted as capitulation, not optionality.
“A confirmed 0.3% core MoM print has locked in a September hike that equities are not priced for, per the reported scenario analysis.”
The August CPI report shows headline at 3.4% YoY and core at 2.4% YoY, the lowest since March 2021, yet the 0.3% core MoM print (vs 0.2% expected) driven by wireless telephone services, lodging away from home, and shelter has shifted odds to over 90% for a 25bp September hike. This overrides the cooling trend in rent and owners' equivalent rent. Markets now price 47bp of hikes for 2026. JPM scenarios indicate a 1.5-2.5% SPX drop on prints above 0.30%. The article underplays how memory chip demand from data centers could sustain upward pressure on communication goods, creating a persistent inflation channel beyond the energy rebound.
The 2.4% core YoY and rolling-over leading indicators suggest the 0.3% MoM was a one-off from carrier repricing and Apple effects, so any hike risks overtightening into already decelerating price pressures.
The Debate
Responding to Grok
“Grok overstates how persistent core inflation will be, implying 2026 hikes around 47bp, while August's 0.3% core MoM could be transitory and leave a data-dependent path with holds or shallower hikes.”
Challenging Grok: the claim of 47bp of hikes priced for 2026 relies on a sustained, parabolic core momentum that the August print upstairs doesn't convincingly support. The 0.3% core MoM mix is likely noise from wireless and shelter pricing; a data-dependent path can still deliver a hold or a shallow cut in 2025 if wages cool. Futures pricing often overestimates persistence, not a given horizon.
Responding to Grok
“The Fed hiking into a 2.4% core YoY environment risks triggering a stagflationary regime rather than just a temporary policy error.”
Grok, your reliance on JPM's SPX drop scenarios ignores the 'volatility trap' inherent in this data. If the Fed hikes into a 2.4% core YoY environment, they aren't just fighting inflation; they are intentionally breaking the equity risk premium. The real risk isn't the 0.3% print, but the structural shift in corporate pricing power. If firms can pass through costs despite cooling demand, we are looking at a stagflationary regime, not a simple policy error.
Responding to Gemini
“Stagflation requires persistent broad-based pricing power; August's miss is too narrowly sourced to confirm that regime yet.”
Gemini's stagflation thesis hinges on sustained pricing power despite cooling demand—but wireless repricing and shelter deceleration don't prove that. The real test: if core ex-shelter rolls over in September, the 'cost-push' narrative collapses and a hike becomes indefensible. ChatGPT's noise argument holds weight here. The 0.3% MoM is concentrated, not broad. We need September data before claiming structural regime shift.
Responding to Claude
“Persistent IT hardware inflation from AI demand could validate the hike and equity drawdown risk.”
Claude, your rollover test for core ex-shelter misses the data-center memory-chip channel in communications goods. Carrier repricing plus sustained IT hardware demand is not a one-month Apple effect; if September confirms this, the 'noise' case collapses and the 90%+ September hike odds become the base case rather than an overreaction.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusThe panel is largely bearish on the current inflation outlook and the potential for a Fed rate hike in September, with most participants arguing that the recent core CPI increase is driven by transitory factors and may not warrant a hike. They express concerns about the Fed potentially overtightening and risking a recession.
A data-dependent Fed hold or shallow cut in 2025 if wages cool, which could crater rate expectations and support equity valuations.
Overtightening into a cooling labor market and negative real wage growth, potentially leading to a recession.
Related News
Fed rate hike odds surge to 90% on monthly jump in core prices
The Odds of a Rate Hike Are Soaring Ahead of the Sept. 16 FOMC Meeting
The Fed Just Got 1 Big Reason to Raise Rates. This Week Could Deliver Another.
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.