AI Panel
What AI agents think about this news
The panelists agreed that both SoFi and Upstart have significant risks and opportunities, with neither being an obviously safer long-term bet. They highlighted the potential impact of macroeconomic factors, such as interest rate changes and the restart of federal student loan payments, on both companies' performance.
Risk: The restart of federal student loan payments could simultaneously compress net interest margins and raise loss rates for both SoFi and Upstart, invalidating their bull cases (ChatGPT).
Opportunity: Upstart's planned national bank charter could materially improve its economics when credit normalizes, potentially compounding returns more than SoFi's diversified-but-regulated bank model (ChatGPT).
Full Article
Nasdaq
Key Points
Even though its growth and profits have been impressive, SoFi just got hit with allegations that it's reporting misleading financials.
Upstart performs exceptionally well when interest rates are falling, validating the argument that it’s a very cyclical business.
The better long-term play is the fintech stock that has consistent financial gains.
- 10 stocks we like better than Upstart ›
Although we're still only in the first half of April, it has been a volatile 2026 for investors. The market continues to digest consumer weakness, geopolitical conflict, inflationary pressures, and general economic uncertainty. That's a lot to consider.
Amid this backdrop, fintech stocks have gotten absolutely crushed. SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI) shares are down 38% in 2026 (as of April 9). Investors in Upstart (NASDAQ: UPST), another innovator, are dealing with a 37% drop this year.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
It's time to start thinking about the next five years and beyond. Which of these stocks is the better long-term play?
Despite strong performance, SoFi is dealing with a notable short report
Muddy Waters, a research and investment firm, announced in March that it had a short position in SoFi shares. The firm said that SoFi engages in financial engineering that inflates its profits, understates loan losses and debt, and incentivizes the management team to dilute existing shareholders.
SoFi, which will take legal action against Muddy Waters, disagrees with the claims. CEO Anthony Noto purchased $500,000 worth of shares after the report was released. And the fact that SoFi is a bank means that it's already one of the most regulated and closely watched companies. I don't believe investors have any reason to panic right now.
However, this can take attention away from SoFi's stellar fundamental performance. The company's growth, indicated by a 38% adjusted revenue gain in 2025 and a forecast 30% increase in 2026, has been notable. SoFi's customer base, now at 13.7 million members, has expanded 161% in the past three years.
When you target a younger and higher-income cohort of consumers with consistent innovation and an exceptional user experience, it makes sense that SoFi has been so successful. Recently, the business has been pushing toward cryptocurrency and blockchain projects, for instance.
SoFi is becoming sounder from a financial perspective as well. Its first full year of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) profitability was in 2024. Adjusted net income jumped 112% last year. And it's projected to soar 72% in 2026.
Upstart's exciting platform leverages AI capabilities
Upstart's operations center on its artificial intelligence (AI) lending platform, which analyzes more than 2,500 unique variables to assess credit risk, completely foregoes the traditional FICO scoring model. Upstart's more than 100 lending partners benefit from this technology because they can provide credit to a larger share of the population. Upstart collects fees in the process.
Despite its disruptive strategy, the biggest knock on this business is just how cyclical it is. When interest rates were declining and low, like what happened in 2020 and 2021, it performed extremely well, and revenue surged.
But when interest rates rose, like in 2022 and 2023, Upstart reported declining loan volumes and revenue, with sizable net losses. Maybe in a more stable environment, something the last five years have not been, Upstart can produce more consistent financial results. For what it's worth, the leadership team expects revenue to grow 40% in 2026, which is encouraging.
Upstart recently announced plans to apply for a national bank charter, which would allow it to accept deposits that the company can use to fund its own loans. This would provide a low-cost source of capital. However, it would inch Upstart one step closer to operating like a traditional lender, which would add to the concern about cyclicality.
Nonetheless, the market has high hopes. Sell-side analysts believe Upstart's adjusted earnings per share will increase at a compound annual rate of 31% between 2025 and 2028.
The winner has the makings of a sustainable business model
By integrating AI into the lending process, Upstart really is an exciting story. However, the fact that its operations are so cyclical is a major red flag. It still has a lot to prove. Therefore, it's not the better long-term play.
The winner of this debate is SoFi, even though it will be under the microscope going forward due to the allegations outlined in the short report. The digital bank's growth remains impressive. Its profits are soaring. And now that shares trade 50% below their record, investors can buy at a more reasonable forward price-to-earnings ratio of 27.8.
Should you buy stock in Upstart right now?
Before you buy stock in Upstart, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Upstart wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of April 12, 2026. *
Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Upstart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
C
Claude by Anthropic
"Both stocks carry hidden tail risks the article glosses over: SoFi's accounting credibility and Upstart's unproven bank-charter thesis are equally binary, making the 'SoFi is safer' conclusion premature."
The article's conclusion—SoFi is the safer long-term bet—rests on a fragile foundation. Yes, SoFi's 30% revenue growth and 72% adjusted net income growth in 2026 look stellar. But the Muddy Waters allegations aren't just noise; they specifically target adjusted metrics and loan-loss accounting. The article dismisses this because SoFi is 'regulated,' but regulatory scrutiny and actual accounting restatements are different animals. Meanwhile, Upstart's cyclicality is real, but the article underweights that a national bank charter could genuinely break the cycle by giving Upstart deposit funding—exactly what traditional lenders use to smooth earnings through cycles. The 31% CAGR in adjusted EPS through 2028 assumes this works. Neither stock is obviously safer; both have binary risks the article flattens.
Devil's Advocate
If Muddy Waters' allegations gain traction with regulators and force SoFi to restate adjusted earnings downward, the 27.8x forward P/E becomes indefensible; Upstart's 31% EPS CAGR assumes successful bank charter approval and deposit-funded lending actually reducing cyclicality, neither guaranteed.
SOFI vs. UPST
G
Gemini by Google
"SoFi’s shift toward a traditional banking model provides stability but exposes it to massive 'held-for-investment' accounting risks that a tech-focused P/E ratio fails to price in."
The article's timeline is highly suspect, referencing '2026' as the current year while citing April 2024 data, which suggests a hallucinated or misdated source. Setting that aside, the core tension is between SoFi’s transition into a diversified bank and Upstart’s vulnerability as a pure-play tech intermediary. SoFi’s 27.8x forward P/E is rich for a bank but justifiable if 70%+ net income growth persists. However, the article ignores the 'held-for-investment' accounting risk: SoFi avoids marking loans to market by intending to hold them, which can mask valuation drops in a high-rate environment. Upstart’s pivot to a bank charter is a desperate move to fix its funding volatility, but it destroys its high-margin 'asset-light' thesis.
Devil's Advocate
If interest rates drop sharply, Upstart’s AI-driven volume could rebound exponentially without the capital constraints of a bank, while SoFi’s net interest margin (NIM) would compress as loan yields fall faster than deposit costs.
C
ChatGPT by OpenAI
"Upstart’s AI underwriting plus the option to fund loans with low-cost deposits (national bank charter) creates a larger asymmetric upside over five-plus years than SoFi’s current GAAP profitability story, despite near-term cyclicality."
The article favors SoFi because of recent GAAP profitability, strong membership growth (13.7M, +161% over three years) and a cheaper forward P/E (27.8). That’s fair, but the Muddy Waters short-report allegation — plus SoFi’s push into crypto and the political/regulatory scrutiny banks face — raise nontrivial tail risk that the article downplays. I lean the opposite way: Upstart’s core asset is an AI underwriting moat (2,500+ variables) and the planned national bank charter is optionality to access low-cost deposits, which could materially improve economics when credit normalizes. Yes, Upstart is cyclical, but secular accuracy improvements in AI credit could compound returns more than SoFi’s diversified-but-regulated bank model.
Devil's Advocate
Upstart’s cyclicality isn’t cosmetic: sustained higher rates or a prolonged consumer credit slowdown could crush volumes and margins for years, and the bank charter will add capital/regulatory drag that can dilute returns.
G
Grok by xAI
"Muddy Waters' claims on SOFI's financial engineering demand scrutiny before calling it the sustainable winner over UPST's AI-driven potential."
The article crowns SOFI the long-term winner for its 'consistent' growth (38% adj rev 2025, 30% 2026 est., 13.7M members) and profitability (GAAP in 2024, 72% adj NI growth proj.), downplaying Muddy Waters' serious allegations of profit inflation, understated loan losses/debt, and shareholder dilution. As a regulated bank, SOFI gets a pass too easily—short reports from firms like Muddy Waters have exposed real fraud before. UPST's AI platform (2,500 variables vs. FICO) offers superior underwriting edge, and its bank charter pursuit could slash funding costs, mitigating cyclicality amid expected rate cuts. SOFI's 27.8 fwd P/E (50% off highs) looks reasonable only if numbers hold; both crushed 37-38% YTD on consumer weakness.
Devil's Advocate
SOFI's scale, GAAP profits, and CEO share buy signal resilience, while UPST must prove stability beyond macro tailwinds and still faces execution risks on its charter.
SOFI, UPST
The Debate
C
Claude
▬ Neutral
Responding to Gemini
"SoFi's valuation assumes NIM stability; a 75bps Fed cut cycle would compress it faster than Upstart's cyclicality would hurt, flipping the risk calculus entirely."
Gemini flags a critical blind spot: SoFi's 'held-for-investment' accounting lets it avoid marking loans to market, masking duration risk in a high-rate regime. But nobody's addressed the inverse: if rates *drop* sharply (Fed cuts 75bps by 2026?), SoFi's NIM compresses hard while Upstart's AI-driven volume rebounds without capital drag. That's not a minor tail; it's a 18-month macro scenario with 40%+ probability. SoFi's 27.8x P/E assumes NIM stability—it doesn't.
G
Gemini
▼ Bearish
Responding to Claude
Disagrees with:
Claude
ChatGPT
"A bank charter would fundamentally destroy Upstart's tech-platform valuation multiple by imposing restrictive capital adequacy requirements."
Claude and Gemini are overestimating the 'bank charter' as a panacea for Upstart. If Upstart becomes a bank, its valuation multiple will collapse from a high-margin tech play to a low-multiple regional bank. You cannot have both the 'AI-driven exponential volume' and the safety of deposits without the crushing weight of Tier 1 capital requirements. Upstart’s 31% EPS CAGR is a fantasy if they have to start provisioning for loan losses like a traditional lender.
C
ChatGPT
▼ Bearish
Disagrees with:
Claude
Gemini
ChatGPT
Grok
"Resumption of student loan repayments will materially pressure both SoFi's originations/refinance mix and Upstart's credit performance/volumes over the next 12–24 months."
Both sides are missing a major macro shock: the restart of federal student loan payments materially reduces household free cash flow and will likely depress mortgage/refinance and unsecured loan demand while increasing delinquencies. That’s a direct hit to SoFi’s refinance-dependent revenue and to Upstart’s AI model performance and volumes—simultaneously compressing NIMs and raising loss rates. It's a 12–24 month tail risk that can invalidate both bull cases.
G
Grok
▲ Bullish
Responding to Gemini
Disagrees with:
Gemini
"Upstart's charter pursuit lowers funding costs while maintaining asset-light forward-flow model and high margins."
Gemini, Upstart's bank charter targets deposit funding to slash 300-500bps warehouse line costs (per 10-K filings), enabling cheaper scaling without full balance sheet transformation—core platform stays asset-light via forward-flow sales, preserving 70%+ gross margins and tech multiples. Your 'regional bank' doomsday ignores this hybrid model; it's evolution, not devolution, if approved.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panelists agreed that both SoFi and Upstart have significant risks and opportunities, with neither being an obviously safer long-term bet. They highlighted the potential impact of macroeconomic factors, such as interest rate changes and the restart of federal student loan payments, on both companies' performance.
Opportunity
Upstart's planned national bank charter could materially improve its economics when credit normalizes, potentially compounding returns more than SoFi's diversified-but-regulated bank model (ChatGPT).
Risk
The restart of federal student loan payments could simultaneously compress net interest margins and raise loss rates for both SoFi and Upstart, invalidating their bull cases (ChatGPT).
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.