The panelists generally agree that while ITW and WM have strong dividend histories and defensive qualities, their current valuations may not justify entry due to cyclical risks and potential margin compression. They also highlight the risks associated with WM's landfill gas-to-renewable natural gas venture.
Risk: Margin compression due to cyclicality and input cost pressure
Opportunity: ITW's decentralized operating model and WM's landfill moat
This analysis is generated by the StockScreener pipeline — four leading LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) receive identical prompts with built-in anti-hallucination guards. Read methodology →
Key Points
- Illinois Tool Works is a Dividend King that yields more than double the S&P 500 average.
- Waste Management has an impressive streak of dividend increases as well.
- Both are examples of boring industrial stocks with dependable income streams.
- 10 stocks we like better than Illinois Tool Works ›
At a time …
Read more
Key Points
- Illinois Tool Works is a Dividend King that yields more than double the S&P 500 average.
- Waste Management has an impressive streak of dividend increases as well.
- Both are examples of boring industrial stocks with dependable income streams.
- 10 stocks we like better than Illinois Tool Works ›
At a time when the S&P 500 carries a dividend yield of just under 1.1%, nearly everything looks good by comparison, including the yield of almost 1.2% on the S&P Industrial Select Sector Index, which is home to the S&P 500's industrial members.
Admittedly, with 10-year Treasury yields hovering around 5%, some income investors may say there's not much to see in the industrial sector, but that's not the right approach. Actually, the sector's scant 1.2% yielddisguises its reputation as a legitimate destination for dependable dividend growth.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
Industrial stocks account for 21.6%of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats® Index (the term Dividend Aristocrats® is a registered trademark of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC), or those members of the S&P 500 that have boosted payouts for at least 25 consecutive years. Only consumer staples account for a larger percentage of that gauge. Likewise, several industrial names are Dividend Kings, or firms with payout-increase streaks of at least 50 years.
The point is this sector isn't the highest-yielding group out there, but it's prime territory for investors seeking reliable payout growth. Illinois Tool Works (NYSE: ITW) and Waste Management (NYSE: WM) confirm as much.
Dividend royalty in the heartland
Industrial conglomerate Illinois Tool Works yields 2.4%, so it's not a quintessential high-dividend stock, but with a streak of payout increases spanning 57 years, it is a Dividend King. Importantly, the dividend's five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.1% implies this industrial stock doesn't just deliver consistent income. It's an inflation fighter, too.
Another attractive trait of this stock is dividend safety. On a scale of "kind of safe," "safe," and "very safe," Illinois Tool Works is, in the eyes of some experts, in the "very safe" camp. That safety is further enhanced by operational excellence. In the second quarter, the company's operating margins jumped 40 basis points, with the year-to-date gain standing at 50 basis points through the first half.
That's impressive, given that Illinois Tool Works faced hurdles stemming from material inflation and employee expenses. Investors shouldn't overlook the importance of operating margins, as these metrics show how much revenue a company retains as profit after accounting for operating and production expenses.
Think of operating margins as the opposite of golf. The higher the number, the better. Robust margins are often hallmarks of some well-known, glamorous growth stocks, but Illinois Tool Works proves that even an industrial conglomerate can master the margin game.
Further solidifying this dividend's reliability and safety is a free cash flow yield of 3.6%. That doesn't just support current payout obligations, it paves the way for future growth AND big-time share repurchases.
It'd be a waste to ignore this dividend stock
There are higher-yielding, larger industrial companies by market cap than Waste Management, but that doesn't diminish the trash hauler's dividend growth potential. The 14.5% payout hike unveiled last December marked the 23rd consecutive year in which the company boosted its dividend. So it's just a matter of time before this stock becomes a Dividend Aristocrat®.
So while waste hauling is far from a glamorous business, there's plenty of glamor associated with Waste Management's dividend growth trajectory. Uninitiated investors may also be overlooking the company's wide moat. Sure, owning landfills is a prosaic business, but establishing a dominant perch in that space isn't easy. Waste Management accomplished that objective.
Waste Management is also a small but growing play on natural gas demand, driven by its landfill gas-to-renewable natural gas business. That enterprise, which is considered a renewable energy outfit, could be a significant earnings contributor as soon as next year.
Improvements in free cash flow conversion and a dedicated share repurchase program, which reduce the number of shares outstanding, support Waste Management's status as a reliable industrial dividend grower.
Should you buy stock in Illinois Tool Works right now?
Before you buy stock in Illinois Tool Works, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Illinois Tool Works wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $384,839! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,385,657!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 936% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of September 24, 2026. *
Todd Shriber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Illinois Tool Works and WM. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
Opening Takes
“Dividend safety for ITW and WM is not guaranteed in a downturn; cyclicality and input-cost pressures could compress cash flow enough to slow or pause dividend growth.”
Opening take: the article leans on dividend safety and long streaks to frame ITW and WM as dependable income. The case rests on cash flow and safety, but it glosses over cyclicality and the risk that a weaker economy or higher input costs could erode free cash flow and limit dividend growth. ITW’s 57-year raise streak and 2.4% yield look solid, yet margins can compress if inflation sticks or demand softens, threatening higher payout coverage. WM’s moat and gas-to-renewables angle are real, but their core cash flow is tied to landfill volumes and policy risk; a recession could blunt both. Not cheap, either, versus yields elsewhere.
Counterpoint: ITW and WM have durable cash flows and essential services components that tend to hold up in downturns, making their dividends more resilient than many. In practice, quality cash flows can justify relative yield support even if macro softens.
“Investors are overpaying for dividend safety in ITW and WM, as current valuations leave little room for multiple expansion and offer poor risk-adjusted returns versus risk-free alternatives.”
While the article correctly identifies ITW and WM as defensive stalwarts, it ignores the valuation trap inherent in 'Dividend King' status. ITW currently trades at a forward P/E of roughly 24x, a significant premium for a company with mid-single-digit organic growth. Investors are paying a massive 'boredom premium' for safety, which limits capital appreciation potential. Meanwhile, WM’s pivot to landfill gas-to-renewable natural gas is a capital-intensive gamble. While the dividend growth is reliable, the current yield-to-valuation spread is unattractive compared to high-quality corporate bonds or even short-term T-bills, which offer superior risk-adjusted returns without the equity duration risk.
The 'boredom premium' is actually a rational hedge against market volatility, and these companies' ability to pass through inflation costs makes them superior to fixed-income assets in a stagflationary environment.
“Reliable dividend growth is not the same as a good entry point when risk-free rates are 5% and valuations are already elevated for 'boring' defensives.”
The article conflates dividend safety with valuation discipline—a dangerous elision. Yes, ITW's 57-year payout streak and 7.1% CAGR growth are real. Yes, WM's 23-year streak and landfill-gas optionality are legitimate. But the piece never addresses whether 2.4% yield on ITW or WM's current valuation justify entry TODAY. With 10-year Treasuries at 5%, the hurdle rate for equity risk premium has risen sharply. The article also downplays cyclicality: industrial conglomerates like ITW are sensitive to capex cycles and manufacturing slowdowns. WM's moat is real but already priced in—the stock trades at a premium multiple to historical averages. Dividend growth alone doesn't protect against multiple compression.
If we're entering a recession, both companies' free cash flow yields will compress faster than dividend cuts, and the 'safety' narrative collapses when earnings fall 20-30% and payout ratios spike above 60-70%.
“Both stocks offer credible payout growth, but the article understates cyclical and execution risks that could cap total returns even if dividends keep rising.”
The piece correctly flags ITW's 57-year streak, 7.1% five-year dividend CAGR, and 40-50 bp margin gains despite input cost pressure, plus WM's 23 consecutive increases and landfill moat. Yet it glosses over industrial cyclicality: ITW's free-cash-flow yield of 3.6% could compress if manufacturing capex stalls in 2025, while WM's landfill-gas-to-RNG venture remains a small, unproven earnings driver whose margins depend on volatile natural-gas prices and regulatory credits.
Even if a mild recession hits, ITW's pricing power and WM's essential-service cash flows have historically protected payouts better than the broader sector, so the dividend-growth thesis may still hold.
The Debate
Responding to Gemini
“ITW's forward multiple may be assuming resilience that could slip if capex slows and costs stay high, risking FCF pressure and multiple compression even with a modest yield.”
Gemini raises a valid concern about the 'boredom premium,' but the bigger risk is failing to monetize optionality in ITW's spread of end-markets. If capex cycles slow and input costs stay elevated, margin compression could hit FCF and payout coverage, even with a 2.4% yield. The 24x forward P/E already prices in resilience; any meaningful demand downturn could trigger multiple contraction alongside weaker dividend growth.
Responding to Gemini
“ITW's 80/20 operating model provides a structural buffer for cash flow that justifies a valuation premium even in a manufacturing slowdown.”
Gemini and Claude are obsessed with valuation multiples, but they overlook the crucial role of ITW’s decentralized operating model. ITW isn't just a generic industrial; its 80/20 business process allows it to shed low-margin volume and protect free cash flow during downturns better than peers. While the 24x forward P/E is rich, it represents a 'quality floor' rather than a trap. The real risk isn't the multiple, but the sustainability of their pricing power if manufacturing demand craters.
Responding to Gemini
“ITW's 80/20 process is a margin-defense tool, not a demand-shock hedge—a critical distinction nobody has made.”
Gemini's 80/20 defense is mechanically sound but historically contingent. ITW's margin protection during 2008-09 relied on pricing power when demand collapsed 30%+—a luxury absent in deflationary downturns. More critically: if manufacturing capex stalls, ITW's decentralized model can't offset volume loss fast enough to prevent FCF compression. The 24x multiple assumes pricing power persists; it doesn't guarantee it survives a severe demand shock.
Responding to Claude
“ITW's post-2008 pruning reduces the relevance of the 2008 precedent for current 80/20 resilience.”
Claude's 2008-09 parallel understates how ITW's subsequent divestitures have trimmed cyclical exposure, leaving a higher share of pricing-resilient segments under the 80/20 framework. That shift could blunt FCF compression relative to prior downturns. The debate still misses WM's RNG margins remaining hostage to natural-gas price volatility and credit markets, an earnings driver whose scale and stability the 24x multiple implicitly assumes will improve.
Panel Verdict
NEUTRAL No ConsensusThe panelists generally agree that while ITW and WM have strong dividend histories and defensive qualities, their current valuations may not justify entry due to cyclical risks and potential margin compression. They also highlight the risks associated with WM's landfill gas-to-renewable natural gas venture.
ITW's decentralized operating model and WM's landfill moat
Margin compression due to cyclicality and input cost pressure
Related News
Prediction: Here's What a $10,000 Investment in Costco (COST) Stock Could Be Worth in 5 Years
Is Ford Stock a Buy for Its Dividend?
Upbound Group Named Top 25 Dividend Stock With 9.83% Yield (UPBD)
My Top Dividend Growth Stock to Buy in September and Hold Forever
Prediction: Morningstar (MORN) Stock Will Be Worth More Than $13 Billion by 2031 -- 73% Higher Than Its Recent Value. Here's the Math.
This is not financial advice. Always do your own research.