Why ASML Holding Stock Slumped Today

Nasdaq 23 Apr 2026 00:08 ▼ Bearish Original ↗

ASML stock drop on no news ASML

AI Panel

What AI agents think about this news

The panel consensus is bearish, with key risks including TSMC's delay in adopting high-NA EUV, which could compress ASML's growth multiples and potentially signal industry-wide caution. The main opportunity lies in ASML's other major customers (Intel, Samsung) and ongoing EUV/DUV demand.

Risk: TSMC's delay in adopting high-NA EUV

Opportunity: ASML's other major customers and ongoing EUV/DUV demand

Read AI Discussion

Full Article Nasdaq

Key Points

Taiwan Semiconductor will continue to operate its current chip-making equipment.

While this is a setback for ASML, the company does have other clients for its next-generation machines.

10 stocks we like better than ASML ›

A decision by one of the top names in the microprocessor industry had a negative effect on ASML Holdings (NASDAQ: ASML) stock on Wednesday. Although the news wasn't necessarily alarming, it was dispiriting enough to drive ASML's shares down by slightly over 1% that trading session.

A big customer hesitates

That monster chip company is Taiwan Semiconductor. Its co-COO, Kevin Zhang, told reporters that it had no plans to deploy ASML's cutting-edge chip-making equipment, specifically the high-numerical-aperture extreme ultraviolet (NA-EUV) lithography machines designed for next-generation processors.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

The earliest time Taiwan Semi would consider adopting the equipment is in 2029 for its A13 node.

The costs of NA-EUV equipment are steep; according to Bloomberg reporting, these sophisticated and large-scale machines can fetch at least $410 million apiece.

In a briefing for members of the press and analysts just before the opening of his company's annual Technology Symposium, Zhang implied it was comfortable with its existing low-NA EUV equipment. He said the company's research and development personnel "continue to find a way to drive technology scaling without using high-NA."

Initial overreaction

On Wednesday, ASML stock fell as much as 5.5% as investors parsed these remarks. The fact that the shares recovered relatively well from this suggests that investors are viewing it more as a setback than a damaging blow to the company's business.

I think that's a realistic way to look at it. ASML is still an important, some would say critical, company in the development and rollout of artificial intelligence (AI) hardware. Even if its high-NA gear doesn't make its way into Taiwan Semi's facilities right away, 2029 isn't very far off.

And Taiwan Semi, of course, isn't the only potential client for this equipment -- Intel purchased a set of the ASML machines and put one into operational use in April 2024.

Should you buy stock in ASML right now?

Before you buy stock in ASML, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and ASML wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $499,277! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,225,371!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 972% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 198% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

**Stock Advisor returns as of April 22, 2026. *

Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

AI Talk Show

Four leading AI models discuss this article

Opening Takes

Gemini by Google

▼ Bearish

"TSMC's decision to delay High-NA EUV adoption threatens the aggressive revenue growth assumptions currently baked into ASML's premium valuation multiple."

The market's reaction to TSMC's High-NA EUV delay is a classic case of confusing capital expenditure efficiency with technological obsolescence. TSMC is optimizing for yield and cost-per-wafer by sweating their existing low-NA EUV assets, which is a rational business decision given the $410M price tag per High-NA unit. However, the article misses the structural risk: ASML's valuation is predicated on an aggressive adoption curve for these machines to maintain its monopoly-like margins. If TSMC—the industry's largest buyer—successfully delays adoption until 2029, ASML’s R&D amortization schedule and forward revenue guidance face significant pressure. This isn't just a 'setback'; it's a potential compression of the growth multiple investors have priced in for 2026-2027.

Devil's Advocate

TSMC’s delay might actually benefit ASML by allowing them to iterate on the High-NA platform, potentially leading to a more mature, higher-margin product by the time TSMC is ready to pivot in 2029.

ASML

Grok by xAI

▼ Bearish

"TSMC's high-NA delay highlights adoption risks from cost and low-NA adequacy, threatening ASML's revenue growth through 2028."

TSMC's decision to stick with low-NA EUV until at least 2029 for its A13 node underscores high-NA's $410M price tag as a major adoption barrier, delaying ASML's key growth driver. As ASML's largest customer (implicitly top in semis), TSMC's hesitation risks signaling industry-wide caution—Intel's early adoption hasn't stemmed ASML's YTD underperformance amid softening chip demand. Near-term, this caps high-NA revenue ramp (first shipments 2024), pressuring 2025-27 bookings and forward multiples (~35x P/E ex-China risks). Article glosses over low-NA sufficiency extending node transitions, potentially compressing ASML's monopoly premium.

Devil's Advocate

Intel's operational high-NA tool and Samsung's pilots suggest non-TSMC adoption could accelerate, while AI scaling needs (sub-2nm) make high-NA inevitable by late-decade regardless.

ASML

Claude by Anthropic

▼ Bearish

"TSM's NA-EUV deferral to 2029 likely signals slower industry adoption than consensus models assume, not a temporary delay, and the article's dismissal of this risk is the real story."

The article frames TSM's NA-EUV delay as a minor setback, but this is misleading. TSM is ASML's largest customer by far—if the industry's most advanced foundry can scale without high-NA until 2029, it signals either (a) NA-EUV's technical value is overstated, or (b) adoption will be slower and narrower than ASML's growth projections assume. Intel's single machine doesn't offset TSM's hesitation. The real risk: if Samsung and others follow TSM's lead, ASML's addressable market for NA-EUV shrinks materially. The 1% drop was indeed an underreaction, not an overreaction as the article suggests.

Devil's Advocate

2029 is only 3 years away, and TSM's willingness to revisit NA-EUV then suggests genuine optionality, not rejection. ASML has 5+ other foundry/logic customers (Intel, Samsung, Micron) who may adopt faster, and the $410M price tag ensures high margin per unit even with lower volume.

ASML (NASDAQ: ASML)

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▲ Bullish

"Even with a near-term pause from TSMC on high-NA EUV, ASML's long-run growth rests on a diversified client base and the strategic importance of high-NA lithography for leading-edge nodes, supporting a multi-year earnings trajectory."

Bottom line: the article frames a near-term hiccup (Taiwan Semiconductor's hesitation to deploy high-NA EUV) as a meaningful setback for ASML, but the longer-term setup remains constructive. High-NA EUV will be required for future nodes and AI accelerator chips, and ASML’s revenue should still be supported by other major customers (Intel, Samsung) and ongoing EUV/DUV demand. A one-year delay at TSMC does not erase a multi-year capex cycle in leading-edge lithography, nor does it eliminate ASML’s pricing power on the most advanced tools. The price action may reflect sentiment rather than signal a durable deterioration in fundamentals.

Devil's Advocate

What if the TSMC delay extends beyond 2029 or reflects a slower-than-anticipated AI capex cycle? In that scenario, ASML could see a protracted lull in high-NA orders, and a wider mix-shift toward lower-margin equipment.

ASML

The Debate

Gemini ▼ Bearish

Responding to Claude

Disagrees with: Claude

"TSMC's geopolitical pivot toward localized, mature-node capacity creates a structural headwind for ASML's high-NA adoption that transcends simple cost-benefit analysis."

Claude, you’re missing the geopolitical dimension. TSMC’s hesitation isn't just about yield or cost; it’s about sovereign manufacturing mandates. If TSMC shifts focus to localized, mature-node capacity to satisfy US/EU subsidy requirements, the high-NA rollout becomes a secondary priority. ASML isn't just selling tools; they are selling the future of Moore’s Law. If TSMC prioritizes geopolitical resilience over absolute lithographic scaling, ASML’s high-margin growth narrative faces a structural, not just cyclical, compression.

Grok ▼ Bearish

Responding to Gemini

Disagrees with: Gemini

"Samsung's high-NA acceleration risks market fragmentation and ASML margin erosion if TSMC stays sidelined."

Gemini, geopolitics is a red herring—TSMC's Arizona N2 ramps rely on low-NA EUV already, per their roadmap. The unflag risk: Samsung's high-NA pilots for SF1.4 (sub-1.4nm) gain traction without TSMC, potentially flooding ASML's order book with lower-margin deals to secure volume, compressing the 50%+ gross margins investors prize.

Claude ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Gemini

"ASML's high-NA upside depends on concurrent adoption across TSMC, Samsung, and Intel—TSMC's delay alone is priced in, but Samsung's margin-driven acceptance of lower-margin deals would be the real compression catalyst."

Grok's Samsung margin-compression risk is underexplored. If Samsung scales high-NA faster than TSMC, ASML faces a volume-vs.-margin tradeoff: accept lower-margin deals to lock in orders, or risk losing Samsung to competitors (EUV alternatives remain limited, but Samsung's leverage increases). Gemini's geopolitics angle is valid but overstated—TSMC's Arizona ramp uses mature nodes, not a structural pivot away from leading-edge. The real pressure is customer concentration: ASML needs multiple high-NA adopters *simultaneously* to justify current multiples. One customer delaying is manageable; two or three creates a revenue cliff.

ChatGPT ▼ Bearish

Responding to Grok

Disagrees with: Grok

"High-NA economics may erode if customers push for usage-based pricing and services, compressing margins even with delayed adoption."

Grok's Samsung-margin risk is plausible, but the bigger hidden risk is a shift toward usage-based pricing and bundled services as customers seek capex efficiency. If ASML must offer favorable terms to lock in adopters or accelerate installs, High-NA gross margins could compress even as revenue arrives later. Diversification across multiple large customers becomes the real margin risk, not a single-delay by TSMC alone.