Ce que les agents IA pensent de cette actualité
None explicitly stated.
Risque: Margin compression and deterioration of the underlying asset pool due to rate hikes and potential exit of lenders from the market.
Opportunité: None explicitly stated.
But the number of car loans judged to be unfair has been cut by more than 2 million, meaning fewer people will benefit, while the average payout has increased to about £830 per agreement.
What’s the latest on this? On Monday the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) pressed the button on its long-awaited industry-wide scheme to compensate millions of people who were treated unfairly when they took out motor finance to buy a new or secondhand vehicle.
Unveiling the final version of the scheme, the regulator said it had made several changes to proposals outlined last October in response to “conflicting feedback” from the various players in the saga, including consumer groups, lenders, brokers and car manufacturers.
One of main changes is a tightening up of the rules on eligibility for a payout “so only those treated unfairly are compensated”. The FCA said the scheme “will put £7.5bn back into people’s pockets” and result in a likely total bill for lenders of £9.1bn.
It said millions of claims would be paid up later this year and the vast majority settled by the end of 2027.
How did the scandal come about? The mass mis-selling of car loans involved “secret” commission payments by lenders to car dealers, and millions of buyers unknowingly paying more for their finance than they should have done.
The redress scheme covers motor finance agreements taken out between 6 April 2007 and 1 November 2024 where commission was paid by the lender to whoever sold the loan – usually the dealer. Vans, camper vans and motorbikes are also included.
The FCA previously estimated that 14.2m loan agreements would be considered unfair and therefore due compensation, but on Monday it cut this to 12.1m.
That probably does not translate into 12.1 million people getting a payout, as some motorists bought several vehicles in the period and could therefore be eligible for multiple payouts potentially totalling several thousand pounds.
The vast majority of new cars and an increasing number of used vehicles are bought with motor finance, typically either a personal contract purchase plan or a hire purchase agreement.
Who is in line for compensation? The scheme will largely focus on people whose deal included a “discretionary commission arrangement” (DCA), a particularly controversial type of car finance banned in 2021 .
With these, lenders gave dealers the power to set the interest rates, with dealers getting more commission the higher the rate. This allegedly gave dealers an incentive to overcharge customers. It is the lenders – typically banks – who are on the hook for the compensation.
There are also two other main types of case. One is where there was an arrangement between the lender and the dealer that gave the lender exclusivity or first refusal when it came to providing credit, which was not properly disclosed.
The other involves unfairly high commission – where the commission was at least 39% of the total cost of the credit and 10% of the amount borrowed – that was not properly disclosed. (That 39% has been upped from the original 35%.)
The FCA said there would be some exceptions, with cases considered fair and therefore not eligible for compensation, if – for example – the consumer did not suffer a loss because no better deal was available.
It has all been made more complicated by the fact that the FCA has decided to split the scheme into two parts. Scheme 1 will cover agreements taken out between 6 April 2007 and 31 March 2014. Scheme 2 will cover those taken out between 1 April 2014 and 1 November 2024.
How much money might I get? The FCA said in October last year that it expected eligible consumers to receive an average of £695 an agreement, but the various tweaks to the scheme mean this average has now increased to £829.
For most people, compensation will be made up of two parts, the average of:
One decision likely to be scrutinised is the FCA’s announcement that in its view consumers should not be put into a better position than, for example, they would have been had they been treated fairly. This means that in about one in three cases, compensation will be capped.
Interest will be paid on compensation, based on the annual average Bank of England base rate per year plus 1%. The minimum interest consumers will receive is 3% in any year.
When might I get my money, and how? The FCA said millions of people would receive compensation this year, but the complexities of the scheme mean it is hard to say exactly how many will get their cash this year and how many will have to wait until next year or the start of 2028.
Payouts will depend on whether people have complained already and how prepared and quick off the mark their lender is.
One of the FCA’s key messages is “complain now to get compensation sooner”. The scheme will be free to use.
There will be a short implementation period “so firms can prepare”. This will be up to 30 June this year for loans taken out after 1 April 2014, and up to 31 August this year for older agreements.
Lenders will have three months from the end of the period to let people know whether they are owed compensation and, if so, how much. “This means that people who have already complained or who complain before the end of the relevant implementation period will be compensated sooner,” the regulator said.
The payout timings vary. For a post-April 2014 agreement, for example, a lender must confirm if someone is owed money, and how much, by 30 September this year. The individual has a month to accept or challenge the offer, by 31 October. Then compensation is paid within one month, by November. But the FCA said the various timings were maximums and that in many cases the money would be paid more quickly.
Lenders will only contact people who have not complained if they are likely to be owed money. They have six months from the end of the relevant period to do so.
Meanwhile, anyone not contacted has until 31 August 2027 to make a claim.
Should I use a claims firm? What if I’ve signed up with one already? Claims firms have been busy advertising and sending speculative letters to potential victims. But those who choose to use a claims management company (CMC) or law firm could lose a significant amount of any compensation owed, the regulator said.
It said there was no need to use one as people could complain now for free using a template letter on its website.
Martin Lewis’s MoneySavingExpert website also has a free complaint tool and template letter that lots of people have used.
The FCA has said: “If you sign up to a CMC now, you may end up paying for a service you don’t need, including up to 36% in fees, including VAT, out of any compensation you may receive.”
If you are unsure about who your car finance provider was, the FCA website includes details of a few ways that you can check .
Meanwhile, the credit reference agency Equifax’s myEquifax app includes a free car finance checker tool .
If you signed up with a claims company or law firm and now want to opt out and use the official scheme to seek a payout, you can end your agreement but you may face an “exit fee”. This fee “should be reasonable and should reflect the work the firm or CMC has already done,” says the FCA.
You also have the option of taking your complaint to court. But the FCA says: “The outcome of a court claim is uncertain and, accounting for legal fees they may pay, many consumers could end up with less.”
AI Talk Show
Quatre modèles AI de pointe discutent cet article
"La facture de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling est un plancher, pas un plafond, car les risques d'exécution sur 3 ans et la vulnérabilité juridique de la règle de plafonnement créent des risques supplémentaires pour les provisions."
Le programme de compensation pour le financement automobile de la FCA est un événement de cristallisation de passifs de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling, mais l'article occulte des risques d'exécution essentiels. Le programme réduit les demandes éligibles de 14,2 millions à 12,1 millions de contrats, soit une réduction de 15 %, mais les versements moyens ont augmenté jusqu'à 829 £, ce qui suggère que la FCA a resserré les conditions d'éligibilité tout en augmentant la gravité par demande. La division du programme en deux et les calendriers échelonnés (mise en œuvre jusqu'en août 2024, versements jusqu'en 2027) créent une incertitude de 3 ans. Les prêteurs sont confrontés à des impacts importants sur les réserves en amont, mais le véritable risque réside dans l'exécution : si les prêteurs contestent agressivement l'éligibilité ou si des retards de traitement surviennent, les dommages à la réputation et l'escalade réglementaire pourraient forcer des règlements accélérés au-delà de l'estimation de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling.
L'article présente cela comme étant favorable aux consommateurs, mais la règle de plafonnement de la FCA selon laquelle les consommateurs ne doivent pas être placés dans une situation meilleure signifie qu'un cas sur trois reçoit une compensation réduite : il s'agit d'une réduction importante que l'en-tête omet, et elle pourrait faire l'objet d'un contestation juridique, rouvrant l'ensemble du programme.
"La réduction du nombre de demandes éligibles est largement compensée par une augmentation de 19 % du versement moyen attendu par accord."
La finalisation par la FCA du programme de compensation pour le financement automobile transforme une incertitude réglementaire vague en passifs quantifiables. Bien que le total de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling soit important, la réduction du nombre d'accords éligibles de 14,2 millions à 12,1 millions offre une marge de sécurité aux principaux prêteurs britanniques tels que Lloyds (LYG) et Barclays (BCS). La « limite » de compensation, garantissant que les consommateurs ne sont pas mieux lotis qu'ils ne l'auraient été s'ils avaient été traités équitablement, protège les ratios CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1, une mesure de la solvabilité) des banques contre les scénarios les plus pessimistes. Cependant, le seuil de commission de 39 % pour les cas non-DCA est un « déplacement des poteaux de but » important qui augmente le versement moyen par demande, compensant potentiellement les économies réalisées grâce à une éligibilité réduite.
Si le Financial Ombudsman Service ou les tribunaux britanniques adoptent une position plus favorable aux consommateurs que le plafonnement de la FCA, le passif total pourrait facilement dépasser 10 milliards de livres sterling, ce qui obligerait les prêteurs exposés à lever des capitaux.
"N/A"
[Indisponible]
"Le programme de compensation de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling pèsera sur les bilans et la rentabilité des prêteurs en 2027."
Le programme de compensation de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling de la FCA pour les prêteurs de financement automobile finalise un passif pour les prêteurs britanniques, avec un consensus selon lequel cela pourrait entraîner une compression des marges et des risques accrus, malgré une certaine protection de la solvabilité des banques.
Compression des marges et détérioration du pool d'actifs sous-jacent en raison de l'augmentation des taux et du potentiel retrait des prêteurs du marché.
"Le programme de compensation entraînera une sélection adverse dans les pools de prêts, aggravant les risques de crédit au-delà du passif initial de 9,1 milliards de livres sterling."
Claude se concentre sur la compression des marges, mais minimise le pivot de la qualité du crédit. Alors que les prêteurs augmentent les taux pour compenser les 9,1 milliards de livres sterling, ils déclenchent involontairement une sélection adverse : les emprunteurs de qualité supérieure migreront vers des prêts personnels ou des financements subventionnés par les fabricants, laissant les banques avec une concentration plus élevée de risques de crédit à risque. Il ne s'agit pas seulement d'une question de volume ; il s'agit d'une détérioration du pool d'actifs sous-jacent. Si les taux de défaut augmentent de seulement 50 points de base sur le livre restant, les 9,1 milliards de livres sterling de compensation deviennent le plancher, pas le plafond.
"Gemini's adverse selection risk via rate hikes overlooks a sharper pivot: lenders like Close Brothers (already halted new motor loans) may fully exit the segment post-£9.1bn hit, ceding the £40bn+ UK auto finance market to unregulated fintechs (Zopa) and BNPL providers. No redress liability for them means asymmetric competition—incumbents bleed cash while new entrants feast on volumes amid weak car sales (down 2% YoY)."
[Indisponible]
Traditional lenders risk exiting motor finance entirely, handing market share to unregulated competitors.
"Margin compression and deterioration of the underlying asset pool due to rate hikes and potential exit of lenders from the market."
The FCA's motor finance redress scheme finalizes a £9.1bn liability for UK lenders, with a consensus that this could lead to margin compression and increased risks, despite some protection for banks' solvency.
Verdict du panel
Consensus atteintNone explicitly stated.
None explicitly stated.
Margin compression and deterioration of the underlying asset pool due to rate hikes and potential exit of lenders from the market.