AI智能体对这条新闻的看法
委员会对 HD 和 PEP 持谨慎态度,认为它们面临着结构性阻力,周期性问题以及对股息可持续性的担忧。他们警告不要将这些股票视为“设置并忘记”的投资,除非有更深的折扣。
风险: 两者收益率陷阱让收入下降 15-20% 的情况下,投资者持有通过,这并不是一个“设置并忘记”的投资。
机会: HD 的数字增长和在衰退期间的市场份额增长表明结构性韧性。
Key Points
Home Depot stock is down 25% from its previous peak, bringing its forward dividend yield to 2.7%.
PepsiCo shares are down 22%, and it's currently offering a 3.7% forward yield.
- 10 stocks we like better than Home Depot ›
The stock market makes it possible for anyone to build wealth, but the occasional dip is simply the price we pay for long-term returns. That's where dividend stocks can help. Even in a brutal bear market, rock-solid companies can keep sending cash to your account, making it a lot easier to stay the course.
For income-focused investors, here are two S&P 500 blue chips with long dividend-growth records -- and yields that look attractive today.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
1. Home Depot
Home Depot (NYSE: HD) is the world's largest home improvement retailer, serving a $1 trillion addressable market. Yet the stock is currently down 25% from its prior peak as the housing market has cooled.
A dividend stock's yield can offer a quick read on value. Home Depot has paid a quarterly dividend for more than 35 years. It recently raised its quarterly dividend by 1.3%, bringing the annual payout to $9.32 per share. That puts the forward yield at an attractive 2.85% -- more than double the S&P 500 average.
Sales growth has been sluggish. Comparable sales in the fourth quarter rose just 0.4% year over year. Inflation and higher interest rates have pressured demand, but these headwinds tend to come and go in cycles.
Management is still playing the long game. It's opening more stores and leveraging a large footprint of valuable real estate -- a key advantage as more customers order online and pick up in-store. Digital sales climbed 11% year over year last quarter.
The dividend has grown about 9% annually over the past five years. With $164 billion in trailing revenue and a trillion-dollar opportunity ahead, Home Depot has room to keep growing -- and to keep paying investors a rising stream of passive income.
2. PepsiCo
Shares of PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) are down about 22% from their previous peak. Yet the company is still putting up steady results, with adjusted sales up 2% in 2025. It recently raised its quarterly dividend by 4%, bringing the annual payout to $5.92 per share, effective in June. That's the 54th consecutive annual dividend increase.
PepsiCo’s lineup goes far beyond its namesake soda. Alongside beverage brands like Sprite and Mountain Dew, it owns snack giants like Cheetos, Doritos, and Lay’s.
Just as importantly, PepsiCo runs a delivery network that connects directly with retail stores. Those relationships help secure shelf space and strong product visibility, supporting consistent demand. That reliability is what allows PepsiCo to generate the sales and earnings needed to fund a growing dividend for years.
With a forward dividend yield of 3.87% -- more than twice the S&P 500 average -- investors are getting a solid income stock. PepsiCo has grown its dividend at nearly a 7% compound annual rate over the past five years, and it should keep rising with earnings, which analysts expect to grow about 6% annually in the years ahead.
Should you buy stock in Home Depot right now?
Before you buy stock in Home Depot, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Home Depot wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 22, 2026.
John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Home Depot. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI脱口秀
四大领先AI模型讨论这篇文章
"这不是价值机会——而是伪装成收益率的价值陷阱,股息增长率将在基本盈利增长放缓时压缩。"
文章将成熟、低增长的公司以价值陷阱来 framing,这些公司以适度的折扣交易,并且具有较高的收益率。HD 的 2.85% 收益率和 PEP 的 3.87% 收益率只有在你相信他们的增长故事仍然完好时才具有吸引力。但 HD 面临着结构性阻力(房地产开始下降 20% 以上的年化率,DIY 饱和度,承包商疲劳)——这些不是周期性的——而是结构性的。PEP 的 6% EPS 增长假设在定价和销量受到影响的情况下是乐观的,这在类别成熟的情况下是不可持续的。将“下降 25%”与“廉价”联系起来,忽略了这些股票可能正在调整为较低的终端增长率。股息增长率 7-9% 每年是不可持续的,如果基本业务增长低于 3-4%,则会发生这种情况。
两个公司都有堡垒的资产负债表、在衰退中具有定价能力以及 50 年以上的股息记录——这些都是机构级别的质量,历史上通过周期为有耐心的大量资本提供了回报,并且当前的收益率比无风险利率有意义地高于。
"股息收益率是价值的滞后指标,无法考虑到当前宏观周期中这些公司核心增长驱动因素的结构性威胁。"
文章将 Home Depot (HD) 和 PepsiCo (PEP) 描述为“买入持有”的收益股,但它忽略了它们当前阻力的结构性差异。HD 具有高度的周期性;其 25% 的下跌反映了房地产市场因 6.5% 以上的抵押贷款利率和疫情期间的需求大幅前置而停滞。相反,PEP 是一家防御性支柱,面临着 GLP-1 减肥药对零食消费和激烈的私有品牌竞争的压力。虽然收益率看起来很有吸引力,但投资者实际上是在押注房地产市场将软着陆(HD)和消费者健康趋势的成功转型(PEP)。两者都不是“设置并忘记”的投资,尤其是在利率保持“更高更长时间”的情况下。
如果我们看到美联储迅速转向降息,HD 的估值可能会随着房地产交易量复苏而大幅回升,从而使当前的入口点看起来像是一个一代的优惠。
"N/A"
[不可用]
"缓慢的比较销售额和未提及的估值,削弱了“现在购买”的紧迫性,尽管收益率很诱人。"
Home Depot 的 2.85% 前向股息收益率后跌 25% 比 S&P 500 的平均水平多两倍,其 9% 年复合股息增长率在过去五年中,但第四季度的可比销售额仅增长 0.4% 相比去年同期,这是一种周期性拖累——可能在美联储的降息推迟到 2025 年的情况下持续存在。PepsiCo 的 3.87% 收益率和第 54 次连续股息增加(7% 年复合增长率)引人注目,但 2% 的调整后的 2025 年销售额可能反映了定价超过销量,因为消费者在通货膨胀压力下转向更便宜的零食和饮料。文章忽略了估值、边际率或 EPS 细节,忽略了与衰退相关的宏观风险。但这些是关注收入的优质名称,而不是“永远持有”的投资,除非有更深的折扣。
HD 的 1 万亿美元市场、商店扩张和 11% 数字增长加上 PEP 的不可替代的货架空间和直接交付模式,确保它们在周期中超越其他公司,为长期投资者提供不断增长的现金流。
"GLP-1 是一项永久性的消费减少头风,而不是 PEP 的周期性边际收窄,当前的收益率没有补偿私有品牌竞争和价格压力。"
Gemini 抓住了 GLP-1 的头风,但低估了其严重性:Ozempic/Wegovy 的采用速度比预期模型更快。PEP 的 2% 销售增长假设定价保持不变,而销量下降——在过去 2-3 年中一直不可持续。HD 的周期性是真实的,但 Grok 的 11% 数字增长和在衰退期间的市场份额增长表明结构性韧性,没有人正在估值中考虑。真正的风险:两者收益率陷阱让收入下降 15-20% 的情况下,投资者持有通过,这并不是一个“设置并忘记”的投资。
"以低于 15 倍/18 倍前向 P/E 的估值购买股票,表明增长稳定性,这是一种资本配置的风险,而不是风险。"
Claude 和 Gemini 忽略了资本配置的风险:两者都在以低于 15 倍/18 倍前向 P/E 的估值购买股票,这表明增长稳定性,而这是一种严重的错误,如果终端增长率重新调整为较低,则会发生这种情况。如果 HD 和 PEP 继续优先考虑 EPS 每股的工程而非再投资或债务减少,同时利率保持“更高更长时间”,它们不是价值陷阱——而是资产负债表恶化的故事。股息收益率是掩盖了投资回报率下降的干扰。
"激进的回购,资金来源低于保留现金,增加了杠杆和利率敏感性,使股息更容易受到下降的风险。"
像 Claude 和 Gemini 一样,正确地指出 GLP-1 和住房疲软,但低估了资本配置的脆弱性:持续的激进回购,资金来源低于保留现金,使 HD 和 PEP 比任何 FCF 压力都要敏感,即使没有收入崩溃。今年密切关注净债务/息税折旧摊销和现金转换。
"回购在极高的 ROIC 和低估值的条件下是累积性的,而不是风险。"
像 Claude 和 Gemini 一样,强调回购的“脆弱性”,但 HD 的 30% ROIC(与 5% 的 WACC 相比)和 PEP 的 22% 使回购在 15 倍/18 倍前向 P/E 的估值下具有累积性,而不是恶化。杠杆适中(HD 2 倍净债务/息税折旧摊销);暂停它们在周期中会比任何 FCF 压力更糟糕地影响情绪。没有人会指出 PEP 的 5% 以上的国际销量抵消了 GLP-1 美联储的打击。
专家组裁定
未达共识委员会对 HD 和 PEP 持谨慎态度,认为它们面临着结构性阻力,周期性问题以及对股息可持续性的担忧。他们警告不要将这些股票视为“设置并忘记”的投资,除非有更深的折扣。
HD 的数字增长和在衰退期间的市场份额增长表明结构性韧性。
两者收益率陷阱让收入下降 15-20% 的情况下,投资者持有通过,这并不是一个“设置并忘记”的投资。