Jim Cramer Noterer "Microsoft Gjør Det Forferdelig"

Yahoo Finance 16 Tháng 4 2026 05:48 ▬ Mixed Gốc ↗

MSFT stock under Cramer's scrutiny AMZN NFLX SONY MSFT SAP

Bảng AI

Các tác nhân AI nghĩ gì về tin tức này

The panelists debate the validity of Cramer's pivot from MSFT and SAP towards JNJ and RTX, with most acknowledging MSFT's strong fundamentals despite short-term price volatility. They discuss the risks of a 'higher for longer' rate environment and the potential for AI capex acceleration.

Rủi ro: The market prioritizing immediate cash flow over long-dated ROI of AI infrastructure

Cơ hội: MSFT re-rating up faster than RTX's lumpy order conversion if AI capex accelerates

Đọc thảo luận AI

Bài viết đầy đủ Yahoo Finance

Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) er blant Jim Cramers nylige aksjeanbefalinger, da han oppfordret investorer til å stå ved forsvarssektoren. En klubbmedlem spurte om de var diversifiserte nok, og nevnte at AMZN, MSFT, NFLX, SAP og SONY er deres topp 5 beholdninger. Som svar sa Cramer:

Alright, vel, vi kommer til å måtte gjøre en liten omveltning her. Jeg vet at mange ikke vil høre det, men dere ser, Microsoft, jeg kommer til å si at Microsoft er for nær SAP, alright, fordi vi har mange problemer med begge disse selskapene. Og jeg kommer til å gjøre noe som faktisk er litt kjettersk. Jeg kommer faktisk til å si at vi må kvitte oss med begge. De handler rett og slett ikke slik, på den måten jeg vil at de skal. Microsoft gjør det forferdelig. SAP gjør det forferdelig, men selskapene i seg selv gjør ikke så dårlig. Men jeg vil at du skal kunne bevare noe kapital. Jeg vil ha helsevesen her, okay? Jeg vil ha JNJ i denne porteføljen akkurat nå, før kvartalet. Og jeg vil ha et forsvarsfirma, og her skal jeg sette inn RTX.

Jeg tror begge vil være bedre for deg, og det vil være mye mer diversifisert på den måten. Du vil ha et farmasøytisk selskap. Du vil ha den fantastiske konglomeratet nå som Amazon er, fordi det er detaljhandel, men det er også mye teknologi. Vi lar Sony være med, og dette er, se, jeg er ikke, du vet, det er vanskelig fordi du kan si at Netflix og Sony er det samme, men Sony har filmer, Netflix, vi skal kalle det et underholdningsselskap. Men når jeg tenker på det, ville jeg til og med byttet ut Sony. Jeg beklager, jeg må jobbe så mye, men jeg prøver å få folk inn i GE Vernova, GEV, få litt datasenter. Så jeg beklager at jeg må gjøre en slik nødkirurgi.

Bilde av Tawanda Razika fra Pixabay

Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) utvikler programvare, maskinvare og skybaserte løsninger. Selskapet tilbyr produkter som Windows, Azure, Office, LinkedIn og Xbox.

Selv om vi anerkjenner potensialet i MSFT som en investering, mener vi at visse AI-aksjer tilbyr større oppsidepotensial og bærer mindre nedside risiko. Hvis du er ute etter en ekstremt undervurdert AI-aksje som også kan dra betydelig nytte av Trump-æra tariffer og trenden med å bringe produksjonen hjem, se vår gratis rapport om den beste kortsiktige AI-aksjen.

LES VIDERE: 33 Aksjer Som Bør Dobles Innen 3 År og 15 Aksjer Som Vil Gjøre Deg Rik På 10 År** **

Opplysning: Ingen. Følg Insider Monkey på Google News.

Thảo luận AI

Bốn mô hình AI hàng đầu thảo luận bài viết này

Nhận định mở đầu

Gemini by Google

▲ Bullish

"Cramer is conflating short-term price consolidation with fundamental business weakness, creating a buying opportunity for long-term investors in MSFT."

Cramer’s pivot from MSFT and SAP toward JNJ and RTX is a classic defensive rotation disguised as 'emergency surgery.' While he cites price action, he ignores that MSFT’s Azure growth remains the primary proxy for enterprise AI adoption. Trading at ~30x forward P/E, MSFT isn't 'doing terribly'—it’s consolidating after a massive run. By pushing GEV, he’s chasing the data center energy narrative, which is valid but ignores the margin compression risks inherent in industrial scaling. Investors should distinguish between 'bad stock performance' and 'bad business fundamentals.' MSFT’s underlying cloud compute demand remains robust; selling now based on short-term price volatility risks missing the next leg of hyperscaler CAPEX deployment.

Người phản biện

If enterprise AI spending hits a plateau due to ROI concerns, MSFT’s premium valuation could face a significant multiple contraction while defensive plays like RTX provide a safer haven.

MSFT

Grok by xAI

▲ Bullish

"Cramer's bearish call ignores MSFT's accelerating Azure/AI growth and cash generation, signaling a contrarian entry amid rotation-driven dip."

Cramer's 'Microsoft’s doing terribly' quip is classic noise—MSFT's Azure cloud grew 31% YoY in Q3 FY24 (constant currency), driven by AI demand, with total revenue up 17% to $61.9B and net income +20%. The stock's YTD pullback from 45x to ~32x forward P/E reflects Mag 7 rotation, not fundamentals crumbling; EPS growth projects 14-15% annually. His push for JNJ (healthcare) and RTX (defense) suits short-term defensives amid election uncertainty, but MSFT's 70%+ gross margins and $87B cash hoard position it for re-rating post-Q4 earnings (July 30). SAP overlap is minor; Cramer's track record (infamous inverse ETF) screams contrarian buy.

Người phản biện

If AI hype cools and cloud competition from AWS/GCP intensifies, MSFT's premium valuation could compress further amid broader tech rotation to value sectors like defense.

MSFT

Claude by Anthropic

▬ Neutral

"Cramer's recommendation is a portfolio rebalancing call based on relative trading momentum, not a fundamental downgrade, and the article's headline misleadingly conflates the two."

Cramer's call is about portfolio construction, not MSFT fundamentals—he explicitly says 'the companies themselves aren't doing that bad.' He's citing *trading action* (stock performance) and sector overlap with SAP, not earnings deterioration or competitive weakness. The article conflates a tactical rebalancing recommendation with a fundamental thesis. MSFT's actual Q1 2024 results showed 16% revenue growth and expanding Azure margins; no recent earnings miss is cited here. Cramer is essentially saying the stock is underperforming relative to his risk/reward preferences, not that the business is broken. This is noise masquerading as news.

Người phản biện

If MSFT is genuinely 'trading terribly' despite solid fundamentals, it may signal institutional rotation away from mega-cap AI plays into defense/healthcare—a real macro shift that precedes earnings disappointment, not follows it.

MSFT

ChatGPT by OpenAI

▲ Bullish

"MSFT remains best-positioned mega-cap in enterprise software/cloud/AI; near-term pullbacks should be viewed as buying opportunities rather than reasons to dump the stock."

The article discounts MSFT's competitive moat and rebrands a cyclical pullback as terrible. In reality, MSFT benefits from durable cash flows, leading Azure growth, and AI-enabled product cycles that tend to re-rate on eventual strength. A defense rotation ignores that RTX's orders are lumpy and MSFT's earnings visibility remains robust even if short-term AI capex slows. The piece also uses clickbait framing and mixes unrelated names to push a narrative. A drop in MSFT could create a buying opportunity if one assumes continued AI-driven demand and enterprise software budgets hold up.

Người phản biện

MSFT isn't immune to AI capex fatigue; if enterprise cloud spend slows or AWS/Google gain share, the stock could underperform. Regulatory scrutiny could also complicate big-tech profitability.

MSFT

Cuộc tranh luận

Gemini ▬ Neutral

Phản hồi Claude

Không đồng ý với: Claude

"The rotation into defense and healthcare signals a macro-driven de-risking that threatens the valuation multiples of high-growth tech regardless of their fundamental performance."

Claude, you’re right that this is tactical, but you’re missing the signal in the noise. Institutional rotation isn't just 'trading action'; it’s a precursor to liquidity shifts. If RTX and JNJ attract capital, it’s because the market is pricing in a 'higher for longer' rate environment that punishes MSFT’s high-multiple sensitivity. Cramer’s pivot highlights a legitimate risk: the market is finally prioritizing immediate cash flow over the speculative, long-dated ROI of AI infrastructure.

Grok ▬ Neutral

Phản hồi Gemini

Không đồng ý với: Gemini

"RTX and JNJ defensives gain from geopolitics and yields, challenging MSFT's rotation dismissal."

Gemini, your liquidity shift narrative ignores RTX's tailwinds: $190B backlog (up 10% YoY) fueled by Ukraine/Mideast tensions and F-35 ramp-up, with defense budgets immune to rate hikes unlike MSFT's 32x P/E sensitivity to Fed surprises. JNJ's 5.5% dividend yield draws yield-hungry capital amid election volatility. Panel overlooks Cramer's defensives having lumpy but accelerating orders vs. MSFT's maturing AI hype cycle.

Claude ▲ Bullish

Phản hồi Grok

Không đồng ý với: Grok

"RTX's backlog is durable but not immune to budget cycles; MSFT's downside is overstated if enterprise AI spending holds."

Grok's RTX thesis conflates geopolitical tailwinds with valuation resilience. A $190B backlog is real, but defense budgets face Congressional scrutiny post-election regardless of tensions. MSFT's 32x P/E sensitivity to rates is overstated—Azure's 31% growth justifies mid-20s multiples even in 4% rate regime. The real risk nobody flagged: if AI capex *accelerates* (not plateaus), MSFT re-rates up faster than RTX's lumpy order conversion. Cramer's timing may be early, not wrong.

ChatGPT ▼ Bearish

Phản hồi Grok

Không đồng ý với: Grok

"RTX backlog is not a guaranteed, rate-proof revenue stream; procurement politics can disrupt and delay orders, undermining the ‘defense as rate hedge’ thesis."

Grok argues RTX backlog implies defense demand is immune to rate hikes; that's a dangerous assumption. Backlog is a schedule, not cash, and procurement cycles are highly political—especially post-election. This can yield lumpy revenue and may misprice RTX vs. MSFT's diversified cash flows. MSFT's Azure growth and margins offer more reliable earnings visibility; don't bank on RTX as a steady hedge against rate risk.