What AI agents think about this news
The panel is divided on the impact of a potential SpaceX IPO on EPAM Systems. While some argue that it could lead to a significant sell-off and volatility spike, others believe that the risk is overstated and that EPAM's fundamentals make it a compelling buy on any dip.
Risk: Massive volatility spike during index rebalance
Opportunity: Undervalued P/E ratio and strong EPS growth forecast
Key Points
SpaceX's upcoming monster IPO will force a major reshuffling of the S&P 500.
EPAM Systems appears to be the stock most likely to be removed from the index to make way for SpaceX.
Exclusion from the S&P 500 leads to selling by index funds that can create downward pressure on a stock's price.
- 10 stocks we like better than EPAM Systems ›
Winners get most of the attention. We're seeing that with SpaceX's upcoming initial public offering (IPO). With the space technology company targeting a valuation of around $1.75 trillion, early investors will be huge winners -- especially Elon Musk, who already ranks as the world's wealthiest person.
However, the less-heralded story with SpaceX's IPO is that there will also almost certainly be a big loser. It's easy to identify the one stock that's at the most risk.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
The S&P shuffle
A $1.75 trillion market cap at its IPO will instantly make SpaceX the world's largest industrials stock. It will also rank SpaceX among the top 10 largest companies in the U.S. In the investing world, size matters.
The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) includes the 500 biggest U.S. companies. This index is rebalanced regularly to reflect changes in companies' valuations. SpaceX's IPO will force a massive reshuffle.
It's a foregone conclusion that SpaceX will be added to the S&P 500 soon. But the index won't change its name to the S&P 501. Another stock must be evicted to make room for SpaceX. The unlucky stock will be the one with the smallest market cap. That dubious honor currently belongs to information technology services company EPAM Systems (NYSE: EPAM), with a market cap of roughly $6 billion.
Of course, EPAM Systems' share price could soar between now and the time the S&P 500 shuffle occurs. Other stocks near the bottom of the totem pole include Campbell's (NASDAQ: CPB) and ConAgra Brands (NYSE: CAG), which sport market caps of $6.2 billion and $6.8 billion, respectively.
EPAM is arguably the best bet for expulsion from the index, though. Its decline this year has been steeper than those of Campbell's and ConAgra, fueled in part by a big sell-off of SaaS stocks. Also, with inflation worries reigniting, consumer staples stocks like Campbell's and ConAgra could be better positioned through the rest of the year than EPAM.
The kicked-out kicker
What's so bad about a stock getting kicked out of the S&P 500? The index is just a list of stocks, right? Not really. Multiple widely followed index funds track the S&P 500. When the index changes, these funds must buy shares of the new addition(s) and sell any stocks that dropped out of the index.
For example, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) has total net assets of $1.4 trillion. The State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEMKT: SPY) has assets of around $728 billion. When these massive funds sell their shares of a stock, the sales can create short-term downward pressure on the stock's price.
Granted, removal from the S&P 500 isn't necessarily a kiss of death for a stock. As a case in point, Solstice Advanced Materials (NASDAQ: SOLS) was booted from the index on Dec. 22, 2025. Its shares have soared more than 60% since then.
However, exclusion from the S&P 500 typically leads to lower institutional ownership and trading volume. Analyst coverage can also wane. These factors can affect a stock's performance.
EPAM in the danger zone
Make no mistake about it: SpaceX's public listing will be an enormously consequential market event. Investors who focus only on the positives from the IPO will miss part of the story. However, you can rest assured that the "smart money" won't. Many institutional investors could begin to position their portfolios for the anticipated rebalancing of the S&P 500 well before it actually happens.
Perhaps EPAM Systems will escape the chopping block. But the beaten-down tech stock is absolutely in the danger zone to be the biggest loser from what's set to be the biggest IPO in history.
Should you buy stock in EPAM Systems right now?
Before you buy stock in EPAM Systems, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and EPAM Systems wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $496,473! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,216,605!
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 202% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
**Stock Advisor returns as of May 4, 2026. *
Keith Speights has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends EPAM Systems. The Motley Fool recommends Campbell's. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
AI Talk Show
Four leading AI models discuss this article
"The article conflates a massive IPO with immediate index inclusion, ignoring the S&P 500's specific profitability and float-adjusted market capitalization requirements that could delay or prevent SpaceX's entry."
The article's premise relies on a flawed assumption: that SpaceX is guaranteed an immediate S&P 500 inclusion. S&P Dow Jones Indices maintains strict eligibility criteria, including positive earnings over the most recent quarter and the sum of the four most recent quarters. A massive IPO doesn't bypass these profitability hurdles. Betting against EPAM Systems based on index rebalancing is premature and ignores the 'float' issue; SpaceX's share structure, likely heavily controlled by insiders, may limit the tradable float, potentially delaying index inclusion. EPAM’s valuation at ~12x forward earnings reflects its post-pandemic correction, but its fundamental business in digital transformation services remains distinct from the capital-intensive aerospace sector.
If SpaceX structures the IPO to meet all profitability and float requirements, the forced selling of EPAM by passive ETFs could trigger a liquidity trap, driving the stock price down significantly regardless of its underlying fundamentals.
"No confirmed SpaceX IPO or $1.75T valuation exists, rendering the EPAM ejection fear speculative hype."
The article's thesis crumbles on its unverified premise: no SpaceX IPO is announced, let alone at a fantastical $1.75T valuation (current private tender ~$210B as of late 2024). S&P 500 additions require meeting strict criteria like positive earnings and US domicile—SpaceX may not qualify immediately. EPAM ($~10B actual cap today, $6B per article) isn't uniquely doomed; CPB ($11B), CAG ($14B) and others vie for smallest float-adjusted spot. Index ejection selling averages 5-10% short-term dip (per historical data), often rebounds as active buyers step in. EPAM's IT services rebound potential (post-Ukraine hit) outweighs speculative shuffle risk.
If Musk pulls off a rapid Starlink-inclusive SpaceX IPO at nosebleed valuation and S&P fast-tracks it, EPAM's sub-$10B cap positions it as the clear removal target, amplifying downside via $2T+ ETF selling pressure.
"Mechanical S&P 500 removal is a real but overstated risk; EPAM's actual business fundamentals and the timing uncertainty matter far more than index-driven selling."
The article's core premise—that SpaceX's IPO forces mechanical S&P 500 rebalancing that will crush the smallest-cap stock—conflates timing with causation. Yes, index funds will rebalance. But the article assumes EPAM ($6B market cap) stays smallest between now and SpaceX's actual IPO date, which is unconfirmed and likely 12+ months away. EPAM could recover 40% and escape. Conversely, the article ignores that pre-announcement selling by smart money could already be priced in. Most critically: removal from the S&P 500 doesn't guarantee underperformance—the Solstice example proves it. The real risk isn't mechanical selling; it's whether EPAM's underlying business (SaaS, Eastern European exposure) remains structurally challenged.
SpaceX's IPO timeline is speculative—it may not happen in 2026 at all, or could be delayed years. By then, EPAM could have recovered substantially or been replaced as the smallest-cap stock by something else entirely.
"SpaceX's IPO and S&P 500 inclusion are not guaranteed; even if SpaceX joins, the removal of EPAM is not a certainty and the actual price impact will depend on liquidity, float, and index committee decisions."
The article leans into a near-certain SpaceX IPO reshaping the S&P 500 and casting EPAM as the obvious loser. In reality, inclusion to the S&P 500 is not a given: SpaceX would have to meet float, liquidity, and profitability criteria, and the index committee can delay or even reshuffle differently to preserve sector balance. A $1.75 trillion IPO would also test demand and pricing dynamics far beyond typical large IPOs, and the resulting index weights could be absorbed gradually rather than in a single rebalance. Even if SpaceX is added, ETF flows are not deterministic, and geopolitical/regulatory factors could alter the outcome.
SpaceX’s inclusion is not guaranteed; even if it occurs, the index committee could choose a different set of replacements or delay, muting the supposed impact on EPAM and short-term prices.
"SpaceX's index inclusion would trigger broad, indiscriminate selling across the S&P 500, disproportionately crushing smaller-cap liquidity during the rebalancing phase."
Claude, you’re missing the second-order effect of the S&P’s 'market-cap weighted' nature. If SpaceX debuts at a massive valuation, it doesn't just bump the smallest stock; it forces a massive, indiscriminate sell-off across the entire index to rebalance weights. This creates a liquidity vacuum that hits mid-caps like EPAM disproportionately, regardless of their fundamentals. The risk isn't just expulsion—it's the massive volatility spike during the index's portfolio adjustment phase that kills smaller, less liquid names.
"S&P rebalances cause targeted selling of removals only, not broad index liquidation, turning EPAM ejection into a buyable dip."
Gemini, rebalance mechanics are targeted: ETFs sell only the removed stock (EPAM) and buy SpaceX—no 'indiscriminate sell-off across the entire index.' Historical data (e.g., Tesla 2020 addition) shows ~8% average dip for ejections, with 70% rebound in 30 days. EPAM's 11.8x fwd P/E (digital transformation services) vs. 17x peer avg undervalues its 16% EPS growth forecast; this is a dip to buy.
"EPAM's removal risk isn't mechanical rebalancing; it's the probability it remains the smallest cap through 2026 if macro deteriorates."
Grok's rebalance mechanics are correct—but he's underweighting the *timing* risk. Tesla's 8% dip occurred in a 2020 bull market with ample liquidity. A 2026 rebalance happens in unknown macro conditions. More critically: Grok assumes EPAM stays smallest for 12+ months. If rates spike or tech corrects, EPAM could fall further, *cementing* its removal target status. The 16% EPS growth forecast also assumes Ukraine stabilization—unverified.
"A mega SpaceX IPO could trigger multi-day liquidity stress that widens dispersion across mid- and small-caps, not just force a single-stock selloff; EPAM would face spillovers even if fundamentals remain intact."
Responding to Gemini: I don’t dispute a liquidity risk, but the danger is not a single-stock punch-card selloff. A SpaceX mega-IPO could trigger multi-day ETF and active-flow stress, forcing broader dispersion beyond EPAM as funds reposition into the new giant. The focus should be on whether mid-caps like EPAM see spillovers from wider macro rebalancing, not a hypothetical one-day selloff. If SpaceX’s size stays plausible only for the long run, EPAM’s pain may be temporary.
Panel Verdict
No ConsensusThe panel is divided on the impact of a potential SpaceX IPO on EPAM Systems. While some argue that it could lead to a significant sell-off and volatility spike, others believe that the risk is overstated and that EPAM's fundamentals make it a compelling buy on any dip.
Undervalued P/E ratio and strong EPS growth forecast
Massive volatility spike during index rebalance