AI智能体对这条新闻的看法
小组一致认为,虚拟试穿 (VTO) 技术有可能减少在线退货并提高利润率,但他们也强调了重大的风险和不确定性。关键的争论集中在通过 VTO 收集的数据的长期价值以及平台经济对零售商的潜在影响。
风险: VTO 技术成为商品化基线成本的风险、 “恐怖谷”效应以及 bracketing 尽管实施了 VTO 仍然可能持续存在。
机会: 创建关于身体形态的专有数据集的机会,这有可能在客户终身价值方面创造竞争优势。
It pinches here; drags there; the draping is wrong. These are some of the examples of the feedback a new crop of artificial intelligence apps might give a prospective customer trying on clothing ahead of a purchase, and in the process reduce the chances of a product being returned to a store.
Fashion retailers are increasingly turning to AI to solve the issue of rising product returns, a persistent drag on profitability and something many in the industry refer to as the industry’s “silent killer”.
A growing number of AI start-ups have emerged to provide virtual try-on technology, allowing potential customers to visualize fit and style before they buy.
While tech companies have attempted to solve online fit issues since the 2010’s, the rapid development of generative AI has finally made these applications good enough to meaningfully impact retailers’ bottom lines.
The U.S. National Retail Federation late last year estimated that 15.8% of annual retail sales were returned in 2025, totaling $849.9 billion. For online sales, that number jumped to 19.3%. Gen Z is driving this trend, with shoppers aged 18 to 30 averaging nearly eight online returns per person last year, the NRF found.
Most returned items never make it back to the shelves and often cost the retailer more to process than the value of the refund itself. It's a multibillion-dollar problem for the industry that’s eating directly into companies’ margins.
“Figuring out how to proactively use returns and then how to minimize them can be a meaningful driver of business and profitability,” Guggenheim Senior Managing Director Simeon Siegel told CNBC.
While fit technology will never be as good as trying something on in person, it’s a great way to bridge the gap, Siegel said. “It’s going to continue to get better, I think that’s going to continue to reduce returns.”
Mirror-like realism?
The primary reason for returns and abandoned shopping carts is uncertainty over fit, Ed Voyce, founder and CEO of AI startup Catches, told CNBC in an interview.
Catches has developed a platform that allows users to create a “digital twin” to try on clothes virtually with what it calls “mirror-like realism.” The application went live last month on luxury brand Amiri’s website for a select range of clothes.
Unlike other models that Voyce says “just look pretty,” the Catches platform incorporates the physics of fabric texture and how material interacts with a moving body.
“The reason we built Catches was to take advantage of a kind of confluence of technologies that is taking place right now to solve this issue effectively,” says Voyce, who founded the startup backed by LVMH’s Antoine Arnault and built on Nvidia’s CUDA platform.
“The reason it’s solvable now in terms of timing is that you have to be able to run visuals for end users on bare metal in the cloud, cheaply enough to make a [return on investment] for brands,” Voyce says.
“This technology has the potential to impact the whole industry and really usher in the new wave of what end users expect.”
Protecting the margin
These AI tools aren't only meant to reduce returns, but also to help enhance purchases.
While e-commerce has grown rapidly in recent years, with online shopping driving retail sales growth, the current U.S. trade policy under President Donald Trump has put a dampener on the sector which relies heavily on manufacturing in Southeast Asia. Across the price spectrum, retailers are struggling to maintain margins as costs rise and consumers become increasingly price sensitive amid inflationary pressures.
While returns are a meaningful drag on profit margins, they are also a critical factor in consumers’ purchasing decisions. NRF data shows that 82% of consumers consider free returns essential, yet the cost of providing them is becoming unsustainable for many brands.
Retailers are now testing a mix of tech and policy to protect margins.
Strategies to reduce returns range from charging for return shipping to providing more granular sizing information and incentivizing exchanges over refunds.
Zara, owned by Inditex, was one of the first to implement return fees for online orders, and while it was a contentious change for some customers, it helped the Spanish retailer protect its gross margin and discourage “bracketing” – the practice of buying multiple sizes to try on at home.
The retailer also rolled out a virtual try-on tool, “Zara try-on,” in December.
Read more
Meanwhile, ASOS recently highlighted a stark improvement in profitability, partly driven by a 160 basis point reduction in its returns rate.
The online fast fashion player has been experimenting with virtual try-ons in partnership with deep-tech startup AIUTA, allowing prospective customers to see a piece of clothing on a range of body types, heights, and skin tones. ASOS, however, cautions that the tool is designed to give general guidance and that customers must still check size guides before purchasing.
Shopify, meanwhile, has integrated startup Genlook’s AI virtual try-on app into its commerce platform, which it says “removes sizing doubts, boosts buyer confidence and drives higher conversion rates while reducing costly returns.”
Tech giants like Amazon, Adobe, and Google have also created virtual try-ons in various shapes and forms, partnering with major brands to roll out the technology.
From April 30, Google’s virtual try-on tech can be accessed directly within product search results across Google platforms, according to Google Labs’ website.
As for Catches, it projects that its app can drive a 10% increase in conversions and a 20- to 30-times return on investment for brand partners. It focuses on luxury brands because of their higher price point. The startup hasn't yet put a number on how much returns might decline with the use of its platform, but targets “massive reductions.”
Not a fix-all solution
“There are certainly companies that have absolutely seen benefits – figuring out how to quantify them is more difficult,” said Siegel.
While the benefits are clear, the analyst cautions that AI is not a magic wand. Beyond fit, retailers are looking at AI for inventory management, customer targeting, and fraud prevention.
“All of those are really interesting use cases, as long as companies don’t abandon who they are,” Siegel says.
“What you sell is always going to be more important than how you sell, and so I just think remembering that will help dictate who wins and benefits and amplifies from AI versus who gets consumed by it.”
AI脱口秀
四大领先AI模型讨论这篇文章
"虚拟试穿可以减少退货,但它不是利润扩张的手段——这是一场效率竞赛,对 AI 供应商的益处大于对零售商的益处。"
这篇文章将虚拟试穿 AI 描述为一种节省利润空间的万能药,但证据不足。ASOS 将退货减少了 160 个基点——令人印象深刻,但退货只是盈利能力的输入之一;毛利率的改善可能源于定价能力或库存管理。Catches 预计投资回报率为 10-30 倍,但尚未公布实际的退货减少量。真正的风险在于:采用需要大量的预付资本支出(云计算、3D 建模),并且投资回报率取决于转化率提升和退货减少同时实现。大多数零售商仍然处于“测试”阶段。这篇文章还忽略了合身度不确定性并不是唯一的退货驱动因素——质量问题、趋势变化和买家后悔也同样重要。科技巨头(亚马逊、Google)的进入正在迅速使该领域商品化。
如果虚拟试穿成为行业标准,那么利润效益就会消失,因为所有竞争对手都会同时采用它;更糟糕的是,如果它通过让客户优化购买来蚕食全价销售,它可能会比退货节省的费用造成更大的收入损失。
"虚拟试穿技术很可能成为一种防御性工具,而不是变革性的利润驱动力,因为实施成本最终将被需要与竞争对手保持同等水平的需求所抵消。"
虚拟试穿 (VTO) 技术是一种经典的“效率提升”手段,掩盖了一个更深层次的结构性问题:服装的商品化。虽然减少 Inditex (ITX.MC) 或 ASOS (ASC.L) 等零售商 19.3% 的在线退货率可以直接带来利润,但市场高估了这些工具的“粘性”。如果该技术变得普遍,它将不再是竞争优势,而将成为开展业务的基本成本。此外,文章忽略了“恐怖谷”的风险;如果数字孪生无法正确表示织物悬垂或合身度,它实际上可能会增加消费者的沮丧感并引发更高的退货率,从而适得其反地损害品牌的声誉。
如果 VTO 技术成功降低了购买门槛,它可能会无意中鼓励“冲动购买”,导致退货净增加,尽管合身度得到了改善。
"AI 虚拟试穿可以减轻退货驱动的利润压力,但文章缺乏硬性、公司验证的证据,证明合身度改进可以转化为不同队列的持续退货率下降。"
这对 AI 赋能的商业来说是看涨的,但文章夸大了确定性。如果虚拟试穿确实降低了在线退货率(NRF:19.3% 在线),考虑到退货处理成本和退款/再分配损失,这可以增加利润。引用的最强证据是 ASOS 的“160 个基点减少”和 Google/Shopify 的合作关系,这表明部署正在扩大。然而,大多数结果取决于在不同尺寸、运动、光线和用户行为下的实际准确性;否则,转化率可能会上升,而退货率不会下降。此外,Z 世代的“八次在线退货”可能反映了产品组合/期望,而不仅仅是合身度不确定性。
虚拟试穿可以提高转化率,但无法实质性地减少退货,因为客户仍然可能订购多个变体(“bracketing”),或者退货是由与合身度无关的偏好变化驱动的。投资回报率预测(例如,Catches 的 20-30 倍)未经实际退货率基线的验证。
"Shopify 整合 AI 试穿工具(如 Genlook),可以推动 5-10% 的商家转化率提升,从而实质性地提升平台经济效益,因为电子商务退货正在压缩。"
AI 虚拟试穿技术旨在解决零售业 19.3% 的在线退货率(1640 亿美元以上的成本),ASOS 已经通过降低 160 个基点来提高盈利能力,Shopify 集成了 Genlook 的工具以提高转化率。Catches 基于物理的“数字孪生”在 Amiri 上的承诺是,奢侈品牌可以提高 10% 的转化率和 20-30 倍的投资回报率(更高的平均订单价值证明了成本)。Inditex 的 Zara 将费用与试穿相结合,以抑制 bracketing。对于 SHOP(200 多万商家,80 亿美元以上的收入),这可以嵌入平台护城河,以应对关税压力,如果扩大规模,可能会将商家利润提高 50-100 个基点。NRF 2025 预测强调了紧迫性,但实际量化仍然滞后于试点项目。
消费者坚持免费退货(NRF 82%),且 AI 逼真度不完善,可能会持续 bracketing,而规模化未经证实的回报率可能会使炒作超过交付,正如 Siegel 所指出的那样。
"VTO 的真正价值在于心理信心,而不是合身度科学;如果 bracketing 仍然存在,投资回报率预测将被夸大 40-60%。"
ChatGPT 指出了“bracketing”的风险——即使对合身度有信心,客户仍然会订购多个尺寸——但没有人量化它。但这里有一个差距:ASOS 的 160 个基点退货减少是在部署 VTO 之后。如果 bracketing 在大规模上持续存在,那么 160 个基点的上限表明 VTO 的实际杠杆是“信心”,而不是合身度准确性。这重新定义了投资回报率,从“消除退货”到“将犹豫不决的顾客转化为购买者”。Catches 的 20-30 倍假设转化率和退货减少同时实现;如果只有其中一个实现,投资回报率将减半。Grok 的 50-100 个基点商家利润提升假设商家采用成本可以忽略不计——事实并非如此。
"VTO 的真正价值不在于减少退货,而在于创建专有的身体形态数据,从而提高长期的客户终身价值。"
Claude 正确地重新定义了投资回报率上限,但你们都忽略了数据收集玩法。如果 VTO 成为标准,零售商不仅可以节省退货费用;他们还可以构建关于身体形态的专有数据集,这比利润提升更有价值。这不仅仅是关于“将犹豫不决的顾客转化为购买者”——而是关于创建一个难以逾越的数据护城河,迫使客户留在品牌生态系统中。投资回报率不在于技术;而在于长期的客户终身价值 (CLV)。
"无法仅从退货基点或转化率提升来判断 VTO 投资回报率;投资者需要每笔订单的毛利润,以及“数据护城河”在隐私/可移植性约束下是否真正可防御。"
Claude 的重新定义(160 个基点 = 信心效应,而不是完美合身消除)是合理的,但仍然缺少一个关键分母:增量平均订单价值/GMV 与增量退款率和物流成本。如果 VTO 通过降低摩擦来提高转化率,零售商可能会理性地接受小幅退货率变化——因此,仅“160 个基点”可能会产生误导,而没有衡量每笔订单的毛利润。此外,Gemini 的“数据护城河”可能被高估:身体/合身数据是敏感的,并且由于隐私和模型再训练成本,在不同平台之间转移可能微弱。
"VTO 数据流向平台(如 Shopify),而不是零售商,加速了商品化。"
Gemini 的数据护城河论点忽略了平台经济:Shopify (SHOP) 和 Google 拥有 VTO 集成,跨 200 多万商家汇总身体/合身数据,用于他们的 AI 飞轮——而不是孤立的零售商 CLV。零售商只能访问推论;GDPR/CCPA 选择加入会削弱价值。这强化了商品化,而不是护城河,并加剧了关税压力下的商家费用。
专家组裁定
未达共识小组一致认为,虚拟试穿 (VTO) 技术有可能减少在线退货并提高利润率,但他们也强调了重大的风险和不确定性。关键的争论集中在通过 VTO 收集的数据的长期价值以及平台经济对零售商的潜在影响。
创建关于身体形态的专有数据集的机会,这有可能在客户终身价值方面创造竞争优势。
VTO 技术成为商品化基线成本的风险、 “恐怖谷”效应以及 bracketing 尽管实施了 VTO 仍然可能持续存在。